Judicially - Judgment Search Results

Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms Vs. Union of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.169 OF2017REPORTABLE Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms Versus .... Petitioner(s) Union of India and Others .... Respondent(s) ORDER1 By means of the

Rajasthan Judicial Service Officers' Assn. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2009SC2944; JT2009(9)SC686; RLW2009(4)SC3481; 2009(9)SCALE430

filed challenging the Notification No. Estt.(RJS)/118/2003 dated 20.10.2003 wherein 19 posts for direct recruitment to the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service (in short `RHJS') were advertised. Out of these 19 posts 11 posts were shown as current vacancies

'K' a Judicial Officer vs. Registrar General, High Court of a.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. The appellant who is a member of superior judicial service of the State of Andhra Pradesh has preferred this appeal for expunging the remarks made by the

Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association (Eevfam) and Othe ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

altogether seventeen (17) persons (out of the list of 1528) are alleged to have been killed in extra judicial executions. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State of Manipur. In the counter affidavit there

Extra Judicial Execution Victim and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the petitioners and therefore directed them to complete the documentation indicating whether the allegations were based on any judicial enquiry or an enquiry conducted by the National Human Rights Commission or an enquiry conducted under the Commissions

Orissa Judicial Services Association, Cuttack and Another Vs. State of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC382; 71(1991)CLT669; [1991(62)FLR116]; JT1990(4)SC726; 1992Supp(1)SCC187; [1990]Supp3SCR348; 1991(1)LC273(SC)

ORDERK.N. Singh, J.1. The Orissa Judicial Services Association has filed this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Rule

Maharashtra State Judicial Service Association and ors. Vs. High Court ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1181; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)635; 2002(5)BomCR221; (2002)3BOMLR388; [2002(93)FLR157]; JT2002(2)SC198; 2002LabIC988; 2002(2)SCALE275; (2002)3SCC244; [2002]1SCR1125; 2002(2

under Article 32 of the Constitution by the promotee District Judges, who are members of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service Association, assails the decision of the Bombay High Court on Administrative side on the question of inter

Kerala Magistrates (Judicial) Association and ors. Vs. State of Kerala ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC1075; JT2001(3)SC229; 2001(1)KLT920(SC); 2001LabIC1119; 2001(2)SCALE301; (2001)3SCC521; [2001]2SCR222; 2001(2)SCT767(SC); 2001(3)SLJ290(SC)

Pattanaik, J.1. The appellants were the Members of the Criminal Judicial Service before its integration and formation of the Kerala Judicial Service. Prior to 1991, in the State of

Delhi Judicial Services Assn. and ors. Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2102; 2001(4)ALT27(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC202; 2001LabIC1743; 2001(3)SCALE737; (2001)5SCC145; [2001]3SCR314; 2001(2)SCT1050(SC); 2001(3)SLJ206(SC); 2001(2)LC826(SC)

1. Pattanaik, J.1. The unending dispute between the promotees and direct recruits in Delhi Superior Judicial Service has reached the third round in these two writ petitions and we hope and trust that this

Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India Through ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2000(6)SC405; 2000(4)SCALE201

the matter regarding bifurcation of the District Courts in Delhi and creation of additional posts in Delhi Higher Judicial Service as well as fixing time schedule for construction of court buildings for separate judicial districts were considered.