Judicial Service - Judgment Search Results

Delhi Judicial Service Association and anr. Vs. Delhi Administration E ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1993IVAD(Delhi)446; 52(1993)DLT536; 1993(27)DRJ541

should be paid to the members of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service and from which date. (26) In order to solve reiterated its earlier approach of the mistaken comparison between the service conditions of the Judges and those of the administrative executive

Delhi Judicial Service Association Thr. Its Presid Vs. High Court of D ...

Court: Delhi

petitions in view of the result of the Delhi Higher Judicial Service Exams declared on 5th June, 2010. Permission granted. The Service. The first being selection from members of Delhi Judicial Service, who had completed more than ten years of service in

Delhi Judicial Services Assn. and ors. Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC2102; 2001(4)ALT27(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC202; 2001LabIC1743; 2001(3)SCALE737; (2001)5SCC145; [2001]3SCR314; 2001(2)SCT1050(SC); 2001(3)SLJ206(SC); 2001(2)LC826(SC)

of other openings due thereto. This situation results in the judicial officers being less than contended in the absence of incentive relation to the State by promotion from the Subordinate Judicial Service, Clause (2) provides for appointment by a person not already

Orissa Judicial Services Association, Cuttack and Another Vs. State of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC382; 71(1991)CLT669; [1991(62)FLR116]; JT1990(4)SC726; 1992Supp(1)SCC187; [1990]Supp3SCR348; 1991(1)LC273(SC)

to be in a pitiable condition and most of the judicial officers have been stagnating for many years for lack of the direct recruitment is unjustified. The members of the Judicial Service should not in our opinion indulge in this kind of

Delhi Judicial Service Association, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi Vs. State ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC2176; 1991CriLJ3086; 1991(3)Crimes232(SC); (1991)2GLR1138; JT1991(3)SC617; 1991(2)SCALE501; (1991)4SCC431; [1991]3SCR936

contempt as their action lowered the authority of the Chief Judicial Magistrate and it further caused interference with the administration of local Police was not cooperating with the courts in effecting service of summons, warrants an notices on accused persons, as a

Delhi Judicial Services Association (Regd.) and anr. Vs. Delhi Adminis ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 49(1993)DLT360; 1992(24)DRJ590; 1993LabIC612; (1993)IILLJ384Del; 1993RLR67; 1993(2)SLJ44(Delhi)

clothes is spiraling the allowance of Rs.300.00 p.m. paid to judicial officers there cannot have any bearing for the officers in some justification for the suggestion that the entire expenditure on service uniforms may be reimbursed to officers of the defense Forces

Rajasthan Judicial Service Officers Association and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1996(2)WLC594; 1996(1)WLN629

the dress allowance provided by the State Government to the Judicial Officers of the State is much on the lower side @ Rs. 15,000/- to the members of the Rajasthan Judicial Services and the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Services with effect from 1.1.1993,

U.P. Judicial Services Association and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Ot ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2001(1)AWC34; (2001)1UPLBEC502

difficult job. It is actually a divine act. Unless the Judicial Officer has a reasonably worry free mental condition, it would made in this writ petition filed by U. P. Judicial Services Association of the State through its President and six Judicial

Maharashtra State Judicial Service Association and ors. Vs. High Court ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1181; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)635; 2002(5)BomCR221; (2002)3BOMLR388; [2002(93)FLR157]; JT2002(2)SC198; 2002LabIC988; 2002(2)SCALE275; (2002)3SCC244; [2002]1SCR1125; 2002(2

were again amended in the year 1992 called the Bombay Judicial Service Recruitment(Second Amendment) Rules, 1992 and Rule 5(2)(ii) reads thus:"Rule of probation anduntil expressly confirmed by a written order the services of an appointee shall beterminated by one month notice on

Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India Through ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2000(6)SC405; 2000(4)SCALE201

further posts in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service and Delhi Judicial Service.3. High Court thereafter will make necessary appointments of the these courts. There is certainly a limit up to which services can be provided for all concerned. Tis Hazari Court Complex