Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Judicial Service - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 07 2009

Rajasthan Judicial Service Officers' Assn. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-07-2009

Reported in: AIR2009SC2944; JT2009(9)SC686; RLW2009(4)SC3481; 2009(9)SCALE430

filed challenging the Notification No. Estt.(RJS)/118/2003 dated 20.10.2003 wherein 19 posts for direct recruitment to the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service (in short `RHJS') were advertised. Out of these 19 posts 11 posts were shown as current vacancies and … 5702/2000 decided today that the strength of the service is as mentioned in Schedule-I of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service Rules, and for varying the strength there has to be a specific order under Sub-rule (2) of Rule


Feb 20 2002

Maharashtra State Judicial Service Association and ors. Vs. High Court ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-20-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC1181; 2002(2)ALLMR(SC)635; 2002(5)BomCR221; (2002)3BOMLR388; [2002(93)FLR157]; JT2002(2)SC198; 2002LabIC988; 2002(2)SCALE275; (2002)3SCC244; [2002]1SCR1125; 2002(2

under Article 32 of the Constitution by the promotee District Judges, who are members of the Maharashtra State Judicial Service Association, assails the decision of the Bombay High Court on Administrative side on the question of inter se … the parties at length on the merits of the matter.The Service conditions of the employees belonging to the Judicial Service of the State of Maharashtra is governed by a set of rules framed by the Governor of Maharashtra


May 01 2001

Delhi Judicial Services Assn. and ors. Vs. Delhi High Court and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-01-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC2102; 2001(4)ALT27(SC); JT2001(Suppl1)SC202; 2001LabIC1743; 2001(3)SCALE737; (2001)5SCC145; [2001]3SCR314; 2001(2)SCT1050(SC); 2001(3)SLJ206(SC); 2001(2)LC826(SC)

1. Pattanaik, J.1. The unending dispute between the promotees and direct recruits in Delhi Superior Judicial Service has reached the third round in these two writ petitions and we hope and trust that this will … which the inter se seniority has to be computed between the direct recruits and promotees in Delhi Higher Judicial Service. The present two writ petitions were initially also there before the Constitution Bench, but in view of the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 01 2000

Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India Through ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-01-2000

Reported in: JT2000(6)SC405; 2000(4)SCALE201

the matter regarding bifurcation of the District Courts in Delhi and creation of additional posts in Delhi Higher Judicial Service as well as fixing time schedule for construction of court buildings for separate judicial districts were considered. The … committee, which has been accepted by the High Court for creation of further posts in the Delhi Higher Judicial Service and Delhi Judicial Service.3. High Court thereafter will make necessary appointments of the District Judges and other officers


Sep 11 1991

Delhi Judicial Service Association, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi Vs. State ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-11-1991

Reported in: AIR1991SC2176; 1991CriLJ3086; 1991(3)Crimes232(SC); (1991)2GLR1138; JT1991(3)SC617; 1991(2)SCALE501; (1991)4SCC431; [1991]3SCR936

was Police Raj in Gujarat. A number of Bar Associations passed Resolutions and went on strike. The Delhi Judicial Service Association, the All India Judges Association, Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, Judicial Service of Gujarat and many others … went on strike. The Delhi Judicial Service Association, the All India Judges Association, Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, Judicial Service of Gujarat and many others approached the Apex Court by means of telegrams and petitions under Article 32


Nov 17 1997

Delhi Judicial Services Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-17-1997

Reported in: JT1998(4)SC256; (1998)2SCC369

an important facet of this issue. About 18 existing Civil Judges including Additional District Judges in the Delhi Judicial Service are without a courtroom and Judge's Chamber. With the result, they are unable to function as Judges. We


Jul 07 1997

Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Th ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-07-1997

Reported in: JT1997(6)SC405; 1997(4)SCALE745; (1997)10SCC750; [1997]Supp1SCR470; 1997(2)LC376(SC)

Matched in: Parties Delhi Judicial Service Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary and ors.


Nov 25 1990

Orissa Judicial Services Association, Cuttack and Another Vs. State of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-25-1990

Reported in: AIR1991SC382; 71(1991)CLT669; [1991(62)FLR116]; JT1990(4)SC726; 1992Supp(1)SCC187; [1990]Supp3SCR348; 1991(1)LC273(SC)

petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 7 of the Orissa Superior Judicial Service Rules, 1963 and for quashing Notification dated 24.2.1987 inviting applications from members of the Bar for direct recruitment … quashing Notification dated 24.2.1987 inviting applications from members of the Bar for direct recruitment to the Orissa Superior Judicial Service.2. The petitioner-Association, which represents the members of the Judicial Service of the State of Orissa has raised grievance


Sep 06 2013

Delhi Judicial Service Association Thr. Its Presid Vs. High Court of D ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-06-2013

NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION(CIVIL) NO. 3353/2010 Reserved on:22. d August, 2013 Date of decision:6. h September, 2013 DELHI JUDICIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION THR. ITS PRESIDENT VINOD KUMAR DHJS & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Advocate with … R. Datar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Delhi Judicial Service Association, petitioner No. 1 has invoked extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of


Nov 15 2000

U.P. Judicial Services Association and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Ot ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-15-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)AWC34; (2001)1UPLBEC502

and S. K. Jain, JJ.1. Three-fold prayers have been made in this writ petition filed by U. P. Judicial Services Association of the State through its President and six Judicial Officers, who are posted in the judgeship … S. K. Jain, JJ.1. Three-fold prayers have been made in this writ petition filed by U. P. Judicial Services Association of the State through its President and six Judicial Officers, who are posted in the judgeship of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial