Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Judicial Office - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 2010

'K' a Judicial Officer vs. Registrar General, High Court of a.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-24-2010

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. The appellant who is a member of superior judicial service of the State of Andhra Pradesh has preferred this appeal for expunging the remarks made by the … the defendants, the Division Bench of the High Court made scathing criticism of the appellant as a Judicial Officer and recorded highly disparaging remarks in paragraphs 10 and 11, which read as under:"10. This attitude of the


Aug 14 2002

U.P. Judicial Officers' Asso. Vs. Union of India (UOi) and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-14-2002

Reported in: [2003(96)FLR409]; JT2002(8)SC133; (2003)1UPLBEC117

ORDER1. This Writ Petition had been filed by the U.P. Judicial Officers Association as a serious incident occurred which tantamounts to interference with the judicial independence. This Court being … ORDER1. This Writ Petition had been filed by the U.P. Judicial Officers Association as a serious incident occurred which tantamounts to interference with the judicial independence. This Court being cognizant


Mar 07 1994

U.P. Judicial Officers

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-07-1994

Reported in: (1994)4SCC687

purported to be done in the discharge of his duty or in his capacity as holder of such judicial office without the prior permission of the Chief Justice of the High Court concerned. In making this interim order,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 15 2024

Kerala Judicial Officers' Association, vs Dr. Venu V., Ias,

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-15-2024

1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 13336/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT COURT ANNEX KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAKESH M.G, AGED 34 … CON.CASE(C) NO. 846 OF 2023 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 13336/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER: KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT COURT ANNEX KALOOR, ERNAKULAM - 682 017 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, RAKESH M.G, AGED 34 YEARS,


Jan 08 2024

The Kerala Judicial Officer'S Association vs the State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-08-2024

8TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 18TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 21591 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S: 1 THE KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION ERNAKULAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.R.SASI. 2 SMT.SREEKALA SURESH, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE-I, & ADDITIONAL MAC … DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 18TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 21591 OF 2017 PETITIONER/S: 1 THE KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION ERNAKULAM,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.R.SASI. 2 SMT.SREEKALA SURESH, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE-I, & ADDITIONAL MAC TRIBUNAL.


Jun 03 2024

Judicial Officer’S Association vs Neethi Pande

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-03-2024

2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED3.4.2024 IN WP(C) NO.16535 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.C:1 JUDICIAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX (ANNEXE), KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682017 2 SAMEER A … AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED3.4.2024 IN WP(C) NO.16535 OF 2024 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.C:1 JUDICIAL OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, DISTRICT COURT COMPLEX (ANNEXE), KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682017 2 SAMEER A AGED


Jan 18 2023

Kerala Judicial Officers' Association vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-18-2023

OF JANUARY 2023 / 28TH POUSHA, 1944 WP(C) NO.694 OF 2022 PETITIONERS :- 1 CHERIAN VARGHESE, (RETIRED CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM), ADATTE MADOM, THURUTHICADE P.O., MALLAPPALLY, PATHANAMTHITTA. 2 R.SUPRABHA, (RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD), ASA BUILDING, … OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 2 ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), INDIAN AUDIT AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), MG ROAD, PB NO.5607, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695 001. 3 HIGH COURT OF


Mar 06 2023

The Kerala Judicial Officers Co-Operative Society Ltd. No.4475, vs Cor ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-06-2023

THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 10993 OF 2021 PETITIONER: THE KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.4475,DISTRICT COURT ANNEXE, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN CODE-682017, REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY P.K. MOHANDAS, … 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 15TH PHALGUNA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 10993 OF 2021 PETITIONER: THE KERALA JUDICIAL OFFICERS' CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.4475,DISTRICT COURT ANNEXE, KALOOR, ERNAKULAM, PIN CODE-682017, REPRESENTED BY ITS HONORARY SECRETARY P.K. MOHANDAS, AGED


Mar 01 2005

r,* Judicial Officer Vs. the Registrar General

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-01-2005

Reported in: 2005CriLJ4176; ILR2005KAR3699; 2006(3)KarLJ584

ORDERS.R. Bannurmath, J. 1. In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a judicial officer has sought for expunction of adverse remarks made in the order dated 16-6-2004 passed in Crl.A. No. … Bannurmath, J. 1. In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a judicial officer has sought for expunction of adverse remarks made in the order dated 16-6-2004 passed in Crl.A. No. 674/97


Aug 08 2007

Kerala Judicial Officers' Association Vs. State of Kerala and Ors.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-08-2007

Reported in: [2007(115)FLR1111]; 2007(3)KLJ488; (2008)IILLJ2Ker

than three years, been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge, orc) delete.d) he has held any judicial office in India for not less than seven years; ore) he has been the presiding officer of a Labour … less than three years, been a District Judge or an Additional District Judge, or he has held any Judicial Office in India for not less than 7 years, or he has been the Presiding Officer of a Labour


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial