Judicial Confession - Judgment Search Results
Sidharth Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-30-2005
Reported in: AIR2005SC4352; 2006(1)ALD(Cri)234; 2005(3)BLJR2097; 2005CriLJ4499; [2006(1)JCR1(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC310; 2005(7)SCALE700; (2005)12SCC545
the prosecution was the confession made by appellant Arnit Das before PW 7 Judicial Magistrate, as also his extra-judicial confession made to PW 8 Arko Pratim Bannerjee. The prosecution also relied on the F.I. Statement given by appellant … the prosecution is the confession made by appellant Arnit Das before PW 7 Judicial Magistrate as also the extra-judicial confession made by him before PW 8 Arko Pratim Bannerjee. The question before us is whether the confession made
inspector of Police, Tamil Nadu Vs. Muthusamy and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-10-2008
Reported in: 2008(12)SCALE515
suffer from any infirmity to warrant any interference. The appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. Criminal - Extra judicial confession - Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Trial Court convicted the
Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-05-2006
Reported in: 2005(1)ALD(Cri)44; 2007CriLJ766; 2006(13)SCALE168
gone to the police station and found the appellant to be in custody. It was furthermore stated that extra-judicial confession purported to have been made by the accused before PW-7 appeared to be wholly unnatural particularly in view … be disbelieved particularly in view of the fact that two of the accused persons were arrested on 24.10.1997.15. Extra-judicial confession made by the accused before PW-7 must be judged having regard to the entire factual matrix. He was
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vinayak Shivajirao Pol Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-22-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC1096; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)368; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)213; 1998CriLJ1558; 1998(1)Crimes131(SC); JT1998(1)SC184; 1998(1)SCALE159; (1998)2SCC233; [1998]1SCR309
ORDERJudgment pronounced by Srinivasan, J.1. The pivotal question in this appeal is whether the extra judicial confession made by the appellant could form the basis of conviction under Section 302 I.P.C. The question was answered … of the appellant whose death was homicidal.II. The appellant had sufficient motive for killing his wife.III. The extra judicial confession made by the appellant to the military authorities was voluntary.IV. The head of the deceased was discovered at
Kavita Vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-23-1998
Reported in: AIR1998SC2473; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)327; 1998(4)ALLMR(SC)399; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)143; 1998CriLJ3624; 1998(3)Crimes67(SC); JT1998(5)SC149; 1998(4)SCALE246; (1998)6SCC108; [1998]3SCR90
and convicted the appellant. The evidence of PWs 1 to 3 was relied on as proving the extra judicial confession alleged to have been made by the appellant. The case of the appellant that herself and her son … the well was rejected. On appeal, the High Court has also placed strong reliance on the alleged extra judicial confession of the appellant and confirmed the conviction and sentence.4. There is no doubt that convictions can be based
State of Punjab Vs. Gurdeep Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-08-1999
Reported in: AIR1999SC3724; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)626; (2000)1CALLT6(SC); 1999CriLJ4597; JT1999(6)SC514; 1999(5)SCALE388; (1999)7SCC714; [1999]Supp2SCR237
order of acquittal passed by the High Court by reason of lack of probative value of an extra judicial confession found by the High Court in an appeal against conviction and sentence under Section 376 read with Sections … the commission of crime to the respondent herein but it is only on the basis of an extra judicial confession that the learned Sessions Judge thought it fit to pass the sentence for life imprisonment, which stands reversed
Pakkirisamy Vs. State of T.N.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-30-1997
Reported in: 1997(2)ALD(Cri)695; 1998CriLJ89; JT1997(8)SC310; 1997(6)SCALE315; (1997)8SCC158; 1998(1)LC101(SC)
prosecution which were held proved by the courts below, it mainly relied upon two vital circumstances, namely, extra judicial confession (Ex. P8) recorded by Ramasami (PW 12) and (B) the recovery of MOs 1 to 4 at the … 12) and (B) the recovery of MOs 1 to 4 at the instance of the appellant. The extra judicial confession (Ex. P8) was said to have been recorded by Ramaswami (PW 12) on August 28, 1986 when the
Dudhichappe and anr. Vs. State of M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh)
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Sep-14-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)MPHT10(CG)
concerned, the Addl. Sessions Judge has placed reliance on the ocular and the circumstantial evidence, i.e., the extra- judicial confession made by the accused persons before Sona Singh (P.W. 1) and Dudhi Bhime (P.W. 17) witnessed the crime. … witnessed the incident. On this Chula and Boddi said that they had witnessed the incident. They also corroborated extra-judicial confession made by accused Chappe Muriya and stated that they saw accused Chappe Muriya attacking the deceased persons with
Parmeshwar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Aug-05-2008
Reported in: 2008CriLJ4190
of maternal uncle of the accused namely Ayodhya Prasad (P.W. 1), before whom the accused/appellant had made an extra-judicial confession in village Kapsda just after the incident. The Head Constable seized the blood stained knife, half shirt and … witnesses, including two eye-witnesses, namely Bhukhan Bai (P.W. 10) & Sadhelal Satnami (P.W. 12) and the witnesses of extra-judicial confession namely Ayodhya Prasad (P.W. 1), Kotwar Punit Das (P.W. 11) & Satrughanlal (P.W. 2), were recorded.3. After completion
Dev Singh Gond Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Court: Chhattisgarh
Decided on: Mar-16-2004
Reported in: 2004CriLJ3101
Dhanman Singh etc. and on enquiry in the presence of all the persons the accused again made extra judicial confession before them to the effect that on the previous evening he assaulted his uncle Manbhawan Singh and due … The post-mortem report is Ex. P/.15. Dhan Singh (PW-1) has also stated that accused/appellant Dev Singh made extra judicial confession before him that he assaulted his Uncle Manbhawan Singh. In view of the above evidence, it stands proved
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free