Judgmental - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Elbros Textiles Limited, Judgment Creditors Vs. Surendrakumar Har ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom381

were the co-plaintiffs in the proceeding before the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division. By the said judgment and decree dated 19th April 1985, the defendants were directed to pay to the plaintiffs the sum of

Judgment Delivered On: 15th Vs. Sonia Khosla and ors

Court: Delhi

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 165/2008 % Judgment delivered on: 15th December, 2011 MONTREAUX RESORTS P.TLD. and ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Anand Mohan Mishra, Adv.

The Judgment Rendered in Gemini Vs. State of Maharashtra [(2004) 9 Scc

Court: Kolkata

court. It was the court, and not the State, that took up the issue which culminated in the judgment reported at 114 Comp Cas 92 (In re: Gemini Silk Ltd) being rendered. The judgment held that an

Whether the Judgment Should Be Reported in the Digest ? Vs. Dr. Pankaj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?.2) To be referred to the Reporters or No.?.3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest

Whether the Judgment and Decree Dated 18.03.1992 Passed in Civil Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

for respondents No.2 and 3. ****** HEMANT GUPTA, J. The plaintiff is in second appeal aggrieved against the judgment and decree passed by the Courts below whereby suit for declaration challenging the judgment and decree dated 18.03.1992

Rura Ram Vs. Gurbachna Judgment-debtor

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1954P& H254

(with the material and the sites thereof and the landimmediately appurtenant thereto andnecessary for their enjoyment) belongingto a judgment-debtor other than an agriculturist and occupied by him: Provided that the protection afforded by this clause shall not

Mr. Mittinti Narasimhamurti and anr. Vs. Pandiri Satyanandam (Judgment ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1941Mad794; (1941)2MLJ386

92 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Section 6 of Act XIV of 1920. After removing the judgment-debtor from his office of trustee, the Court directed him to pay a certain amount with interest and also

Fathima vs Jayanthi.N (4TH Respondent in the Judgment)

Court: Kerala

WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1945 CON.CASE(C) NO. 601 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.25132 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER/S: FATHIMA AGED 47 YEARS W/O ABDUTTY,

C.P. Sureshan, (Wrongly Shown as P.P. Suresh in Lower Court Judgments ...

Court: Kerala

OF SESSIONS COURT, THALASSERY DATED 20.06.2018 REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: C.P. SURESHAN, (WRONGLY SHOWN AS P.P. SURESH IN LOWER COURT JUDGMENTS) AGED 55 YEARS, S/O NARAYANAN, ACHUTHA RAM HOUSE, AZHIKKAL, KANNUR, PIN - 670009 BY ADVS. ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH

Perinthalmanna Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd.No.P 534 vs C.V.Vijayam ( ...

Court: Kerala

MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 27TH MAGHA,1942 WA.No.229 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.19988/2009(P) DATED 17.12.2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: THE IRINJALAKUDA CO OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL