Skip to content


Judgment - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: judgment Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.122 seconds)
Jan 01 2002 (TRI)

Ballarpur Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2002

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT182TriDel

..... commissioner appeals in his order has observed that in terms of para 17 of the judgment of the hon ble supreme court in solar pesticides v cce 17 the words incidence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2002 (TRI)

Mecon Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Nov-11-2002

Reported in: (2003)(87)ECC152

..... board this is settled position of law f in this view of the matter the judgment of the hon ble supreme court in the case of flock india pvt ltd 2000 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. M. Raja

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Nov-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)(151)ELT689Tri(Chennai)

..... that the seized amount were the sale proceeds of smuggled goods he relies on the judgment rendered in the case of ramachandra v collector of customs reported in 1992 60 e .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2002 (TRI)

Sunshine Agency Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)(156)ELT978Tri(Mum.)bai

..... indicates lack of application of mind by the commissioner attracting the ratio of the tribunal judgment in the case of poonnm cargo services v collector of customs 1999 110 e l .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2002 (TRI)

Polymech Plast Machines Ltd., Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-13-2002

..... for the appellant is not able to advance before us any argument or cite any judgment which impel us to conclude that in a situation in which the assessee had not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 2002 (TRI)

Dcm Shriram Consolidated Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-13-2002

Reported in: (2003)(86)ECC91

..... for the purpose and with the intention of manufacturing fertiliser following the ratio of this judgment we hold that the appellants have complied with the condition stipulated in the notification and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Cus. (Ep) Vs. Virendra Kanshiram Gandhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-12-2002

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT128Tri(Mum.)bai

..... had been raised against v k gandhi for payment of duty citing the supreme court judgment in the case of dabur india ltd v state of uttar pradesh 1990 49 e .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2002 (TRI)

United Television Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-11-2002

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT315Tri(Mum.)bai

..... exemption contained in the notifications on the question of limitation he has said that the judgment of the supreme court in prabhat sound studio v cce 1996 88 e l t .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2002 (TRI)

Sarla Polyester Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-11-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT323Tri(Mum.)bai

..... lakhs towards duty and penalties imposed on the company and its employees he cites the judgment of the supreme court in siv industries ltd v cce 2000 117 e l t .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2002 (TRI)

Cc Vs. Balumal Sons

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Nov-20-2002

Reported in: (2003)(107)LC323Tri(Chennai)

..... prameela submits that they have also filed cross objection and contends that the apex court judgment is not applicable to customs cases and is applicable only to the excise case 4 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //