Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: old Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 665 results (0.157 seconds)

Lala Shanti Swarup Vs. Munshi Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1315; 1967(0)BLJR483; [1967]2SCR312

..... the self-liquidating mortgage and to deliver possession of the property in the proceedings for liquidation of that debt which had been decreed by the special judge under the u.p. encumbered estates act. on behalf of the defendant-appellant it was pleaded that the suit was time-barred. the contention was that the claim of the plaintiff- ..... passed in their favour for a little over rs. 26,000. thereafter the respondents made an application under the u.p. encumbered estates act, and by an order dated may 22, 1939, the special judge apportioned the liability for the mortgage debt between the respondents and the purchasers as owners of half the mortgaged property. as a result ..... bench which heard the appeal in the first instance referred the question of limitation to a full bench of five judges which held that the suit was governed by article 83 read with article 116 of the limitation act and that time ran from february 25, 1943 which was the date upon which the respondents were compelled to .....

Balchand Champalal Bhandari Vs. India Pictures and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1967MP280

..... plaintiff had to obtain the copy and there are certain happenings in the copying department which had to be extracted after an elaborate inquiry by us with reference to the document and registers of the district judge's copying department. from that also it is urged that even apart from limitation of the suit, the appeal in this ..... on that test the present suit brought on the 13th september 1954 was within time treating any one of the three cheques as acknowledgment under section 20 of the limitation act. 14. in the result, therefore, we wouldallow the appeal, set aside the trial court'sjudgment of dismissal and decree the suitfor principal and interest; future interest alsopayable ..... the cheques--one honoured and two dishonoured--was equivalent to part payment or acknowledgment in the writing of the debtor for the purposes of section 20 of the limitation act, having found that it was, on the strength of ruling of this court in 1961 mplj 645'. (air 1961 madh pra 346) it went on further to .....

C. Venkata Reddy and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer (Central) I, Banglore ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1967]66ITR212(KAR); [1967]66ITR212(Karn)

..... might refer to two cases dealing with the constitutionality of section 37(2) of the 1922 act, viz., surajmull nagarmull v. commissioner of income-tax and senairam doongarmal agency (p.) ltd. v. k. e. johnson. in the former, all the three learned judges constituting the special bench, which decided the case, unanimously held that section 37(2) was ..... of eliciting evidence as aforesaid is a classification which is not sanctioned by article 14 of the constitution. for this purpose, as already stated, the starting point of inquiry is what is the object of legislation. the answer, as already given, is prevention of evasion. that attempts to prevent evasion are or may be in the ..... the usefulness or relevancy referred to could only be usefulness or relevancy of the type appropriate to the stage of investigations but not to an actual trial or inquiry. it would only suggest or require an application of the mind to make out a prima facie case of usefulness or relevancy and not a final or absolutely .....

A.V. Ramachandra Naidu Vs. Hassina Bi and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ139

..... covenant to pay. a decision of the allahabad high court in bisnan datt singh v. mathur prasad : air1939all260 , is referred to as authority. the learned subordinate judge states that counsel for the plaintiff during the arguments represented that he was not pressing his client's case under the personal covenant, as the plaintiff's claim under ..... exhibit a-2 dated 21st december, 1942, the principal amount was payable on or before 21st december, 1945. the plaintiff who under article 132 of the limitation act, 1908 had 12 years to bring the suit for sale from when the mortgage money became due, relied upon the acknowledgment of the mortgages under the registered sale ..... simple and a usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee was entitled to a decree for the mortgage money under clause (a) of section 68 of the transfer of property act. clearly under the terms of the mortgage now under consideration the covenant to pay is more pronounced. there is not even an option as in the aforesaid case .....

Joy Sankar Bhattacharjee Vs. Sushil Kumar Gupta and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... is equally well settled that the presumption of innocence of the accused is further reinforced by his acquittal by the trial court and that the views of the trial judge as to the credibility of the witnesses must be given proper weight and consideration. it was also held that there must be substantial and compelling reasons for the ..... accounts before 1.9.1960, and filed the criminal case against the respondents on 7.11.1960, which was committed to the sessions.3. the learned assistant sessions judge framed charges against the 1st respondent under sections 408 and 477-a i.p.c. and framed charges against the other respondents under the same sections read with ..... confessional statement made on oath by an accused person before the assistant registrar of co-operative societies in an inquiry held by him in regard to certain forged cheques is not necessarily inadmissible under section 24 of the indian evidence act. in ram singh v. state air 1959 all 518 it was held that to distinguish between a .....

State of Orissa Through the Land Acquisition Collector Vs. Amarandra P ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1967Ori180

..... it in any proceeding before the collector or the court to appear and adduce evidence for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation. the scope of the inquiry envisaged in section 21 gives full opportunity to a consideration of me interest of the company who is affected by the objection relating to the quantum of compensation. ..... on whose behalf the acquisition is made by the state. it includes only the persons as defined in section 3(b). under section 21. the scope of the inquiry in every such proceeding shall be restricted to a consideration of the interests of the persons affected by the objection. section 50(2) lays down that in any ..... award for 92.40 paise. on the objection of respondent-1, the collector made a reference to the district judge under section 18 of the land acquisition act for determination of compensation. the matter was ultimately heard by the learned subordinate judge. sambalpur, who valued the disputed land at rs. 3300/-. he also decreed a sum of rs 495/- .....

Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Sudhakar and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1968MP47

..... . indubala bhandari, resulting in permanent physical disabilities;2. these appeals arise out of the award dated 30-7-1963, passed by the claims tribunal gwalior (additional district judge) in different claim cases filed by the injured persons for the injuries caused to them as also for the death of some close relations. the tribunal invoked the principle ..... mere speculative possibility of pecuniary benefit. to succeed he must prove a reasonable probability of pecuniary advantage. in that case the plaintiff claimed damages under the fatal accidents act, 1846, for the loss of his son, who was living with him and was killed while walking along the pavement by being crushed by a pole which fell ..... the happening of the accident and nothing more. it may be that he cannot prove more, but whether he can or not he does not prove any specific act or omission on the part of the defendant. the mere happening of the accident itself may be more consistent with negligence on the part of the defendant than .....

Amulya Patnaik Vs. State of Orissa (Represented by the Collector)

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1967Ori116; 33(1967)CLT684; (1968)ILLJ64Ori

..... to take the case out of the category of cases where vicarious liability of the employer would arise. the learned subordinate judge rightly held that the state was vicariously liable to pay damages for the rash and negligent act of its driver. 6. the next question is what is the principle for determination of quantum of damages in a case ..... was so wide at the spot that two vehicles could easily pass each other there. the conclusion of the learned judge that the accident was due to rash and negligent driving is unassailable.5. thus the driver committed a tortious act in course of his employment by the state government. in air 1962 sc 933, state of rajasthan v. mst. ..... rash and negligent driving on the part of the driver and that the state was vicariously liable for the act of the driver in course of ms employment. on the further finding that the plaintiff was the widow of late padmacharan the learned judge decreed the suit for rs. 8400/- assessing the damages at the rate of rs. 25/- per .....

Sukanraj Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj267; 1967CriLJ1702

..... trial with respect to each distinct offence. the object evidently is that the attention of the trial court should be directed to the evidence relating to the charge under inquiry and irrelevant matter should be excluded. this object is not achieved by adopting such procedure but defeated by placing on the record mere copies of the statements of ..... run concurrently. 2. it is needless to state the prosecution case as both the appeals can be disposed, of on the question of illegality committed by the trial judge in recording the evidence of the witnesses. it is urged by the learned counsel for the appellant that five prosecution witnesses were examined in case no. 9 but their ..... khan v. emperor, air 1928 lah 34, a person was tried separately for two offences namely, section 307, i.p.c. and section 20 of the indian arms act. the witnesses in the two cases were more or less the same. the trying magistrate recorded the evidence of the witnesses in one case and the copies thereof were taken .....

Kotwal (T.C.) Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and anr.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ780J& K

..... alone. moreover, there is another circumstance which lands support to this view which is that in case the high court after inquiry into the conduct of a district judge or a judge subordinate to him comes to the conclusion that penalty of dismissal, removal or reduction in rank is not called for, it ..... have committed certain irregularities which amounted to corruption within the meaning of the act.26. the question is, in the circumstances of the instant case, who was the authority competent to conduct the inquiry against him. the petitioner is a district judge and ho was temporarily officiating as custodian. any lapse on his part ..... judges subordinate to them. the some view has been reiterated by the supreme court in the case of state of assam v. ranga muhammad and ors. 1968 -i. l.l.j.282.22. the learned advocate-general relying on section 126 of the constitution of jammu and kashmir argued that the governor being the dismissing authority is alone competent to conduit disciplinary inquiry .....