Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: old Year: 1967 Page 7 of about 665 results (0.758 seconds)

The State Vs. Darshan Singh Gobind Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1968CriLJ1259

..... code, or something more than that? if it is something more, the jurisdiction of the high court is not ousted by section 3(2) of the contempt of courts act.so judged, there could be no doubt that the aspersions cast in the present case amounted to scandalizing the court itself, and were no mere-personal insult, and the high court ..... constitutes contempt of court. as observed by lord russell of killowen c. j. in the queen v. gray (1900) 2 qbd 36, 'any act done or writing published calculated to bring a court or a judge of the court into contempt or to lower his authority, is a contempt of court' lord hardwicke l.c. hag described this kind of contempt ..... conceivably be desorbed as a mere criticism of this sort. it was a flagrant and open attack on the judge himself, besides being extremely insulting. the power of the high court under the contempt of courts act 1952 (act 32 of 1952), hereinafter called the act is as follows:3 (1) subject to the provision of sub-section (2) every high court shall .....

Standard Literature Co. Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1968Cal1,71CWN719

..... disposal, as all of them involve a matter of great public importance, pamely the vires of the public premises (eviction of unauthorised occupants) act. 1958 (central act 32 of 1968) (hereinafter referred to as the 'said act'). there has been a common argument in all these cases and the point of law being tht same, they will all be governed by ..... given to the persons affected to show cause against the proposed order of eviction and also to present their case to the estate officer at the lime of the inquiry. if the estate officer makes an order of eviction, he is to give the persons in occupation of the public premises thirty days' time to vacate the premises ..... or classification having a clear and reasonable relation to the object sought to be attained.' 21. it was held that the main reasoning of the majority of the judges in anwar ali's ease (supra) was hardly applicable to the impugned statute, based on a classification which in the context of the abnormal postwar economic and social .....

State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. Vs. Tashire

Court : US Supreme Court

..... never be "claimants" against the insurer? i cannot believe that congress launched such an irrational scheme. the court rests heavily on the fact that the 1948 act contains the phrase "may claim," while the 1926 and 1936 interpleader statutes contained the phrase "are claiming." from this change in language, the court infers that ..... have been a tenable position under the 1926 [ footnote 8 ] and 1936 interpleader statutes. [ footnote 9 ] these statutes did not carry forward the language in the 1917 act authorizing interpleader where adverse claimants "may claim" benefits as well as where they "are claiming" them. [ footnote 10 ] in 1948, however, in the revision of the ..... judge weinfeld's opinion in twentieth century-fox film corp. v. taylor, 239 f.supp. 913, 918-921 (d.c.s.d.n.y.1965), and in ali, study of the division of jurisdiction between state and federal courts 180-190 (official draft, pt. 1, 1965); 3 moore, federal practice 22.09, at 3033-3037; chafee, federal interpleader since the act .....

Crown Coat Front Co., Inc. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

..... 59 . such a civil suit is seemingly barred if the right to bring it first accrued more than six years prior to the date of filing the suit. our initial inquiry is, therefore, when the right of the contractor in this case to bring suit in the district court page 386 u. s. 511 first accrued. in our opinion, ..... has decided nager electric co., inc. v. united states, 177 ct.cl. 234, 368 f.2d 847, a unanimous decision by that court supported by an exhaustive opinion by judge davis dealing with the application of the "first accrual" language of 28 u.s.c. 2501 [ footnote 5 ] to both breach and disputes clause claims under the typical ..... contain a provision making final on a question of law the decision of any administrative official, representative, or board." [ footnote 10 ] the committee report on the wunderlich act disaffirms an intention to confer any new rights on the contractor other than the widened scope of review and refers specifically to the six-year statute of limitations barring stale .....

Pierson Vs. Ray

Court : US Supreme Court

..... inquiry, or the threat of such inquiry, into whether, in fact, a judge has been unfaithful to his oath of office. thus, it is necessary to protect the guilty as well as the innocent. [ footnote 2/ ..... motive not connected with the public good." gregoire v. biddle, 177 f.2d 579, 581. to deny recovery to a person injured by the ruling of a judge acting for personal gain or out of personal motives would be "monstrous." ibid. but it is argued that absolute immunity is necessary to prevent the chilling effects of a judicial ..... refuses to disperse and move on, or disperse or move on, when ordered so to do by any law enforcement officer of any municipality, or county, in which such act or acts are committed, or by any law enforcement officer of the state of mississippi, or any other authorized person, . . . shall be guilty of disorderly conduct, which is .....

Ftc Vs. Procter and Gamble Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

..... disagreement with the second commission's view. it held that "[a]ny relevant evidence must be considered in a section 7 case. . . . the extent to which inquiry may be made into post-merger conditions may well depend on the facts of the case, and, where the evidence is obtained, it should not be ignored." 358 f ..... were essentially conglomerate. but the majority in both cases chose to treat them as horizontal, and thus did not reach the problem of standards for judging conglomerate mergers. see brodley, oligopoly power under the sherman and clayton acts -- from economic theory to legal policy, 19 stan.l.rev. 285, 303-308. [ footnote 2/2 ] thus, the procter memorandum ..... offset by the difficulties encountered in obtaining it. and the post-merger evidence before us in this proceeding is, at best, inconclusive. deciding that 7 inquiry in conglomerate or product extension merger cases should be directed toward reasonably probable changes in market structure does not, however, determine how that .....

Shantaben Thakor Vs. New Raipur Mills Co. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1968Guj118; [1968(16)FLR54]; (1967)GLR1012

..... was the immediate exciting cause of chandulal's death. if that is so, injury was caused to chandulal as a result of an accident. the learned single judge who heard the first appeal against the order of the learned commissioner, set aside the order of the learned commissioner granting compensation on certain principles which have been ..... which has been urged before us by mr. jaykar on behalf of the workman. as english judges have from time to time pointed out, any decision under the workmen's compensation act is not an easy decision free from difficulty. learned judges for a long period in england have construed the various expressions used under the workmen's ..... compensation act and it is not always easy to reconcile all the decisions, and therefore one must .....

Prince Azam Jah Vs. Expenditure-tax Officer

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [1970]78ITR364(AP)

..... to the assumption in the sections quoted of community when, two spouses live together and when usually each would get the benefit of the income of each without inquiry into the source. so far as the constitution of the united states is concerned the legislature has power to determine what the consequences of marriage shall be, ..... in the opinion of the court, is more reasonable, unless it is convinced that the method adopted is capricious, fanciful, arbitrary or clearly unjust.' 52. the same learned judge, speaking for the court, in gopal narain v. state of uttar pradesh, stated:'but in the application of the principles, the courts, in view of the inherent complexity ..... that the respondent was empowered to reopen the assessment under section 16 of the act. regarding the main question under article 14 turning on the interpretation of section 4(ii) of the act, it was held by the learned judge that different kinds of property may be subject to different rates of taxation, but so long as there .....

The State Vs. Ganesha and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1968Raj116; 1968CriLJ648

..... police officer within the meaning of section 190 (b) cr. p. c. it was in that context that the learned judges had to con-cider whether a report by an excise officer for an offence under the rajasthan excise act could be treated as a police report so that resort could be had to section 251a cr. p. c. regarding the ..... illegality in the absence of proof of actual prejudice.in ghisia's case the learned judges were dealing with a case under section 54 (a) of the rajasthan excise act which arose before the rajasthan excise amendment act (no. 22) of 1958 came into force before this amendment act, the report of an excise officer could not have been treated as one by a ..... mode of trial the learned judges came to the conclusion that the report of an excise officer could not be treated as that .....

State of Rajasthan Vs. Vijairam

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1968CriLJ270

..... v. united states, (1895) 159 us 523, in these terms: 'the decision of this question (whether the child-witness has sufficient intelligence) primarily rests with the trial judge, who sees the proposed witness, notices his manner, his apparent possession or lack of intelligence, and may resort to any examination which will tend to disclose his capacity and ..... record the questions put to this witness.9. the proviso to section 5 of the oaths act does not require that the court should also keep a record of the material which formed the basis of its opinion, the sessions judge was satisfied that it was a case in which oath should not be administered and statement be ..... clear that it was erroneous'. the mere circumstance that the sessions judge did not interrogate the witnesses, before their examination began, with a view to test their capacity, does not, in the view i take of the true effect of section 118 of the indian evidence act, invalidate the trial.this view has been followed by the calcutta .....