Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: judges inquiry act 1968 section 5 powers of committee Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1967 Page 1 of about 141 results (0.103 seconds)

Lala Shanti Swarup Vs. Munshi Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1315; 1967(0)BLJR483; [1967]2SCR312

..... the self-liquidating mortgage and to deliver possession of the property in the proceedings for liquidation of that debt which had been decreed by the special judge under the u.p. encumbered estates act. on behalf of the defendant-appellant it was pleaded that the suit was time-barred. the contention was that the claim of the plaintiff- ..... passed in their favour for a little over rs. 26,000. thereafter the respondents made an application under the u.p. encumbered estates act, and by an order dated may 22, 1939, the special judge apportioned the liability for the mortgage debt between the respondents and the purchasers as owners of half the mortgaged property. as a result ..... bench which heard the appeal in the first instance referred the question of limitation to a full bench of five judges which held that the suit was governed by article 83 read with article 116 of the limitation act and that time ran from february 25, 1943 which was the date upon which the respondents were compelled to .....

Bejoy Lakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1145; [1967]2SCR406

..... which he is interested; and the collector has to give an opportunity to the said objector of being heard; and, after hearing objections and making such further inquiry, the collector is to submit the case to the state government along with his report. under section 5, the state government may direct the prescribed authority or ..... farmers society, the 3rd respondent herein. in both the appeals there was a common attack against the order of the learned single judge setting aside the entire proceedings taken by the government, under the act. the division bench has also held that art. 166(2) is only to the effect that, when authentication is made in the ..... other matters pertaining to the preparation and submission of such a scheme. 13. the appellant's writ petition was heard, in the first instance, by a learned single judge of the calcutta high court. the appellant raised, broadly, two contentions. the first contention was that the notification, issued under section 4 as well as the declaration .....

Pannalal Vs. Murarilal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1967(0)BLJR749; [1967]2SCR757

..... that this statement is false. the respondent filed an affidavit stating that the appellant was directly informed of the passing of this ex-parte decree by the first civil judge on august 16, 1958. this statement was not denied by the appellant. the courts below concurrently found that the appellant was personally present in the court of the ..... the ex-parte decree passed in suit no. 22 of 1958. this application was numbered as miscellaneous case no. 104 of 1958. on august 16, 1958, the first civil judge, kanpur, passed an order setting aside this ex-parte decree on certain conditions. the order sheet in o.s. no. 22 of 1958, misc. case no. 104 of ..... bachawat, j. 1. this appeal incidentally raises a question of interpretation of article 164 of the indian limitation act, 1908. the respondent instituted two suits against the appellant in the court of the first civil judge, kanpur. suit no. 25 of 1958 was for the recovery of moneys due on a mortgage for rs. 50,000. suit no. 22 of 1958 .....

Rajendra Prasad JaIn Vs. Sheel Bhadra Yajee and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1445; 1967(0)BLJR718; 1967CriLJ1218; [1967]3SCR19

..... the direction to decide whether a case placed before him under art. 28 of the letters patent should be heard by one judge or more judges than one, and this power of the chief justice was actually exercised when in this case, he directed that the case ..... of the high court at patna is significant. under r. 1 (xi) a case under the indian companies act is to be heard by a single judge; and r. 3 indicates the nature of one of the orders which can be passed by a bench hearing ..... himself keen to support. it cannot be said in these circumstances that any irrelevant material as taken into account by the learned judge at this stage. we cannot, therefore, hold that there was any such misreading of evidence or admission of irrelevant evidence which ..... six groups and each group was asked to vote for a particular candidate. this was the allotment referred to by the learned judge. this circumstance is quite relevant; because it is obvious that another candidate seeking to bribe a voter of the congress party .....

Krishna Kumar Narula Etc. Vs. the State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1368; [1967]3SCR50

..... 4) even the high court held that in regard to licensees against whom there were no complaints a further inquiry should be held. in support of the contention we were taken through all the necessary correspondence. the learned judges on a consideration of the entire material placed before them, held that the commissioner of excise and taxation ..... restriction on the appellant's fundamental right to do business. 23. this argument was sought to be sustained on the following grounds : (1) though under the act yearly leases were issued, in practice renewal was a matter of course. (2) on the basis of the issuance of a licence heavy expenditure had been incurred ..... said localities, the respondents refused to renew their licences to carry on the said business in the said localities. they also pleaded that under the excise act, 1958, hereinafter called the act, the issuing of licence was at the discretion of the excise commissioner and he had, having regard to the complaints received, bona fide, in .....

Mohammad Khalid Vs. the Chief Commissioner, Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in mahmood ahmed abbasi v. the administrator of karachi, criminal miscellaneous application no. 483 of 1959, decided on 19th december, 1960 the main reason which weighed with the learned judges in deciding in favour of the petitioner in that case, was precisely the same which has weighed with us in disposing of this petition. (8) we, therefore accept ..... forfeited and to issue search warrants for the same, and reads as under '(1) where- ia.) any newspaper, or book as defined in the press and registration of books act 1867 (25 of 1867), (b) any document, wherever printed, appears to the state government to contain any seditious matter or any matter which promotes or is intended to ..... feelings of enmity or hatred between different classes of citizens of india and the publication of which is punishable under-section 153a of the indian penal code (act xlv of 1860) now, therefore, on the above-stated grounds and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 99a of the code of criminal procedure .....

Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha Vs. Sitamarhi Central Co-operative Bank Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1967SC1494; 1968(16)BLJR1; 1967CriLJ1380a; [1967]3SCR163

..... of court of a kind not punishable by the court of the commissioner itself (appointed to hold an inquiry under public servants inquiries act, 1850) and that for the purpose of the contempt of courts act the word 'subordinate' would include all courts and tribunals over which high court is given the power ..... . in brajanandan sinha v. jyoti narain(1) the question was, whether a commissioner appointed under the public servants (inquiries) act, 1850 was a court within the meaning of the contempt of courts act, 1952. there, after referring to authorities like coke on littleton and stroud and stephen, the privy council decision in ..... of superintendence under art. 227 of the constitution. ' in lakhama pesha v. venkatrao swamirao a.i.r. 1951 pun 49 the question was, whether the chief judge of the court of small causes acting .....

Jagir Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1968SC43; 1968CriLJ89; (1968)70PLR201; [1967]3SCR256

..... , the appellants, about whose identity there is no manner of doubt whatsoever, cannot escape the consequences of the act of all the six persons merely because in the case of three of those who have been acquitted the learned judge has not been satisfied as to their identity and the fourth he has acquitted on a consideration that as no ..... corroboration is available as to him of the witnesses he may be given the benefit of doubt. the matter might have been different if the learned judge had disbelieved the witnesses with regard to those four persons, but this he has not done.' 4. the charge against the six accused including the two appellants was ..... bombay : 1960crilj424 , 12 named persons including the two appellants were charged with offences under s. 302 read with sections 149 and 34 of the indian penal code. the sessions judge acquitted seven of the accused but convicted five under s. 302 read with s. 149 and s. 302 read with s. 34. on appeal, the high court acquitted one .....

Bhajan Singh Hardit Singh and Co., Delhi Vs. Karson Agency (India) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... from the end of july, 1951, and therefore, the suit was barred by time. (7) the learned subordinate judge held that according to section 46 of the sale of goods act read with section 54 of the same act, an unpaid seller has a lien on the goods for the price while he is in possession of them, and ..... respondent on 23-8-1951, and was thus barred by time. dealing with this contention, the learned judges observed that the aforesaid argument did not take sufficient account of section 24 of the indian limitation act. after extracting section 24, the learned judges proceeded to observe as follows:- 'a breach in the abstract would not be sufficient, in our opinion, ..... no reference was made either by the parties or the learned subordinate judge to any particular article in the limitation act as being applicable to the case. they appear to have assumed that the period of limitation was 3 years, presumably under article 115 of the limitation act, and the controversy was only as to the date on which the .....

Hans Raj Vs. Rattan Chand, Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1968MhLJ164(SC); [1967]3SCR365

..... condonation of delay but failed to ascertain with reference to the nature of i. a. no. 1900 of 1960. whether it fell under s. 4 of the provincial insolvency act. the learned judge found that the petitioner had not made any claim before the official receiver and even if she chose to make any such claim, the official receiver had no power ..... was a claim put forward by a stranger to the insolvency proceedings setting up his own independent title. and it fell within the scope of s. 4 provincial insolvency act.' 12. the learned judges distinguished the cases of bhairo prasad v. s. p. c. dass : air1919all274 and hussaini v. muhammad zamir abdi a.i.r. 1924 oudh 294, on the ground ..... any question of the nature referred in sub-section (1) but has reason to believe that the debtors has saleable interest in any property the court may without further inquiry sell such interest in such manner and subject to such conditions as it may think fit'. 4. section 5 lays down the general powers of court under the .....