Joshi V State - Judgment Search Results

V.Dilip Kumar Vs. State Rep. by Deputy Superintendent of Polic.

Court: Chennai

P.W.1. To substantiate his arguments, he relied upon the following decisions:(i).AIR 2011 SC 3114 (Rafiq Ahmed @ Rafi v. State of Uttar Pradesh)(ii) (2009) 6 SCC 77 (S.V.L.Murthy v. State rep. by CBI, Hyderabad)(iii) AIR 2009 SC 1822

Farman Imran Shah @ Karu Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

ii] Dilawar Balu Kurane v. State of Maharashtra “ (2002) 2 SCC 135. iii] Yogesh alias Sachin Jagdish Joshi v. State of Maharashtra “ (2008) 10 SCC 394. iv] Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander “ (2012) 9 SCC 460. … SCC 222. Dilawar Balu Kurane v. State of Maharashtra – (2002) 2 SCC 135. Yogesh alias Sachin Jagdish Joshi v. State of Maharashtra – (2008) 10 SCC 394. Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander – (2012) 9 SCC 460. Ranjitsing

Jeevan Lal Yadav Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Court: Chhattisgarh

grave cannot take the place of legal evidence. Learned counsel placed reliance in the matter of Gangaram Satnami (Joshi) v. State of C.G. (2010(1) C.G.L.J. 395) in which a coordinate Division Bench of this Court has held that in … impugned judgment - appeal being devoid of merit - appeal dismissed. Para 22, 23 Cases Referred; Gangaram Satnami (Joshi) v. State of C.G. (2010(1) C.G.L.J. 395) Dhananjoy Chatterjee alias Dhana v. State of W.B. ((1994) 2 SCC 220)

Ashok B. Dani Vs. State of Karnataka by Malleswaram Police Station

Court: Karnataka

authorities : 1. Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab, 1999 SCC (Cri) 33, 2. Yogesh alias Sachin Jagdish Joshi v. State of Maharashtra, (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 51. 9. The learned State Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, seeks … Cases Referred: 1. Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab, 1999 SCC (Cri) 33, 2. Yogesh alias Sachin Jagdish Joshi v. State of Maharashtra, (2009) 1 SCC (Cri) 51, 3. Union of India v. Prafulla Kumar Samal, (1979) 3 SCC

Nashath Jinan and Others Vs. The Government of India, Rep. by its Secr ...

Court: Chennai

out of every seventy five seats in undergraduate courses in the Institute for local applicants. 13. In D.P.Joshi v. State of Madhya Bharat [(1955) 1 SCR 1215: AIR 1955 SC 334], wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India

P. Sujanapal Vs. State of Kerala, represented by its Chief Secretary a ...

Court: Kerala

wrongful act. He would place reliance on the decisions of this Court in Vypeen Vishamadhya Koottakola Virudha Samithy v. State of Kerala and others [2005 (1) KAJ 547] to contend that the power to order payment of compensation

K.C. Rajesh Vs. T.K. Santhakumar and Others

Court: Kerala

to be out of time. 14. But in a subsequent decision of the apex court in Rameshchandra Ambalal Joshi v. State of Gujarat and Another [(2014) 11 SCC 759], while considering the question as to how the period of … Lokesh Sharma (2008 (2) KLT (SN) 18 Case No.21), Sivakumar v. Natarajan [(2009) 13 SCC 623], Rameshchandra Ambalal Joshi v. State of Gujarat and Another [(2014) 11 SCC 759], Econ Antri Limited v. Rom Industries Limited and Another [(2014)

The State of Maharashtra Through The Chief Secretary Government of Mah ...

Court: Mumbai

) (10) Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited v. Rajesh Kumar, 2012 (7) SCC 1 (para 36) (11) S.V. Joshi v. State of Karnataka, (2012) 7 SCC 41 (paras 9 to 13) Set of circumstances of the State 38. The

The National Textile Corporation (South Maharashtra) Ltd. Vs. Shramik ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(1)BomCR160; (1990)92BOMLR492; (1993)IIILLJ277Bom

reliance upon a decision of the Division Bench of this High Court in the case of W. W. Joshi v. State of Bombay : AIR1959Bom363 , the case dealt with some employees of that part of the State of … The Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. (supra) : (1978)IILLJ17SC . Therefore, the decision in the case of W. W. Joshi v. State of Bombay : AIR1959Bom363 and the observations in para 24 of the judgment, have no application to the

Sardar Daleepsingh S/O Sardar Pratapsingh Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1983)85BOMLR497; 1983MhLJ75

the aid of the General Clauses Act.13. It has been held by the Supreme Court in Ishwarlal Girdharlal Joshi v. State of Gujarat AIR[1960] S.C. 870, that the validity of the order could not be called in question on … of 1961 authenticated by a Desk Officer in the name of Governor of Maharashtra is not valid.;Ishvnrlal Girdharlal Joshi v. State of Gujarat [1968] A.I.R. S.C. 870 referred to. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section