Joint Will - Judgment Search Results

Workmen of Joint Steamer Companies Vs. Joint Steamer Companies

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1963SC1710; (1963)IILLJ349SC; [1964]3SCR456

and Railway Co., Ltd., and the Rivers Steam Navigation Co., Ltd., which have for many years been operating jointly and are conveniently referred to as 'Joint Steamer Companies'. Disputes having arisen between these companies and their workmen … Bench Formula, finally crystallized by this Court in Associated Cement Companies' Case : (1959)ILLJ644SC , be applied, it will be found that no available surplus for distribution of bonus remains. In support of this case the companies

Joint Official Liquidator of Bank Vs. Joint Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)6SOT391(Mum.)

additional ground of appeal filed by way of letter dated 20-7-2005 which was as follows : 'The learned Joint CIT erred in treating the interest income of Rs. 42,76,580 received by the appellant on deposits with bank … this appeal are : "(a) whether or not the provisions of section 115A of the Income Tax Act will apply to a case where a non-resident has placed deposits with Indian branch of a foreign bank; (b)

Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. I.T.C. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1999]239ITR921(Cal)

that report and huge additions were made and those additions were deleted subsequently, therefore, he submits no purpose will be served by the appointment of the special auditor under Section 142(2A) and the assessee will be unnecessarily

Motor Industries Co. Ltd. Represented HereIn by Its Joint Managing Dir ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (2007)211CTR(Kar)489; [2007]292ITR70(KAR); [2007]292ITR70(Karn)

not arise. All disputes cannot automat6ically be entertained unless there exists an industrial dispute. Any unexplained long delay will render the claim as stale. Further, the Labour Court on surmises and conjectures and on hypothetical grounds cannot

Narsingh Das Vs. Firm Joint Hindu Family Known as Gogan Ram Lachmi Nar ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1955P& H31

Falshaw, J.1. The facts giving rise to this Letters Patent Appeals are as follows.The present appellant, a joint Hindu family firm named Gogan Ram Lachmi Narain, instituted a suit in the Court of the Senior Subordinate … that there should be a reference to arbitration, the mere fact that defendant No. 2 did not join will not debar parties agreeing to an arbitration from making a reference to arbitration. Para 1 of Schecule 2,

The Krishna Kakeri Joint Society Ltd. Through Its Member Vs. the Guru ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

to the accuracy and integrity of this document CHANDIGARH CM-3409-C-2014 and Rs.NO.22-2013 Date of decision:26.03.2014 The Krishna Kakeri Joint Society LTD.through its Member Sanjit Malik ...Appellant Versus The Guru Nanak Cooperative Joint Farming Society LTD.through its President

Buchler and Another (as Joint Liquidators of Leyland Daf Limited) (Res ...

Court: House of Lords

substantially the whole of its undertaking. In the following year the group collapsed and the charge holder appointed joint administrative receivers ("the receivers"). On their appointment the floating charge crystallised into a fixed charge. The receivers proceeded … and interest, £72m. Litigation in the Netherlands, which is still continuing, has raised the prospect that these proceeds will be insufficient to meet the claims of those entitled to share in the debenture security. 7. Leyland Daf

The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer Vs. Kesar Lal

Court: Supreme Court of India

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 2014 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 2150 of 2020) The Joint Labour Commissioner and Registering Officer and Anr Kesar Lal Versus Appellants Respondent JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The … the meaning of Section 2(d) of the Consumer Protection Act 1986. The issue assumes significance because the answer will determine whether a beneficiary of a statutory welfare scheme is entitled to exact accountability by invoking the remedies

The Joint Director (Rayalaseema), Anti-Corruption Bureau, a.P. & Anr. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2026] 1 S.C.R. 740

[2026] 1 S.C.R. 740 : 2026 INSC 37The Joint Director (Rayalaseema), Anti-Corruption Bureau, A.P. & Anr. Etc. v. Dayam Peda Ranga Rao Etc. (Criminal Appeal No(s). 122-134 … of the CrPC, 1973, is unacceptable - Similarly, the finding, that the subsequent clarificatory Government Order of 2022 will not have an effect on the FIRs registered, is totally untenable and against the basic canons of law

Joint Secreatary, Political Department Govt. of Meghalaya Main Secreta ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2987 OF2016(@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.6825 of 2016) Joint Secretary, Political Department, …Appellant(s) Government of Meghalaya, Main Secretariat, Shillong Versus High Court of Meghalaya …Respondent(s) through its … Legacy,” on September 2, 1962, while stating about the greatness of Felix Frankfurter, chose the following expression:- “History will find greatness in Felix Frankfurter as a justice, not because of the results he reached but because of