Joint Venture - Judgment Search Results

Prasad Sushee Joint Venture, Hyderabad Vs. The Singareni Colleries Com ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

3. It is submitted that the petitioner herein is a Joint Venture Company, of which the bidder is a constituent and perspective it would have found that NHL, being a joint venture, has access to the benefit of the resources and strength

Salma Dam Joint Venture Through: Sjv Projects Pvt. Ltd vs.wapcos Limit ...

Court: Delhi

JV Agreement stipulates that notwithstanding inter se disputes between the joint venture partners, obligations stipulated therein shall continue to be discharged and on behalf of AIL or on behalf the Joint Venture and for the said purpose appoint arbitrators, sign and verify

Sll Sml Joint Venture Consortium Through Its Authorized Signatory Name ...

Court: Jharkhand

by the petitioners and therefore, the bid submitted by the Joint Venture Consortium has wrongly been rejected by the respondentCCL and, disclose the details of incomplete documents submitted by the Joint Venture Consortium. On 15.09.2015, the respondent no. 3 disclosed that the

Continental Foundation Joint Venture Sholding, Nathpa H.P. Vs. Commiss ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(121)ECC140; 2007LC140(SC); 2007(216)ELT177(SC); JT2007(11)SC286; 2007(10)SCALE459; 2007(2)LC1075(SC)

Tribunal has held that the view expressed in Continental Foundation Joint Venture's case (supra) was not the correct view.8. In response, correctness of the judgment by CEGAT in Continental Foundation Joint Venture's case (supra) was doubted and the matter was referred to

Pradeep Agencies-joint Venture Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)111TTJ(Delhi)346

member Share in P&L of JV 4. A copy of joint venture (JV) agreement has been placed at pp. 1 to not taxable in the hands of respective members of joint venture; 2. Apropos ground No. 2 it is held that as

Salma Dam Joint Venture Through Ssjv Projects Pvt Ltd vs.wapcos Limite ...

Court: Delhi

the said agreement dated 9th March 2006 defines Salma Dam Joint Venture to include its partners. However, by its letter dated the aforesaid JV partners as set out in the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dated 9th September 2005 which forms a part

Femc- Pratibha Joint Venture vs.commissiiner of Trade & Taxes

Court: Delhi

for GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. WITH FEMC- PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE W.P.(C) 6059/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain, with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. Satyakam, ASC FEMC- PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE AND W.P.(C) 6068/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain,

Femc- Pratibha Joint Venture vs.commissioner of Trade & Taxes

Court: Delhi

GNCTD with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. Satyakam, ASC FEMC- PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE AND W.P.(C) 6068/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh with Ms.Trisha, LA, DTT, GNCTD. Satyakam, ASC FEMC- PRATIBHA JOINT VENTURE AND W.P.(C) 6068/2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Rajesh Jain,

Patel- Gammon Joint Venture vs.satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

DELHI Date of Decision:7. 1.2019 + ARB.P. 717/2018 PATEL- GAMMON JOINT VENTURE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shankh Sengupta and Mr.Mohit Rohtagi, Date of Decision:7. 1.2019 + ARB.P. 717/2018 PATEL- GAMMON JOINT VENTURE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Shankh Sengupta and Mr.Mohit Rohtagi, Advs.

Bbel-Mipl Joint Venture Vs. National Highway Authority of India

Court: Delhi

DELHI AT NEW DELHI OMP No.363/2015 7th July, 2015 BBEL-MIPL JOINT VENTURE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. Naik AT NEW DELHI OMP No.363/2015 7th July, 2015 BBEL-MIPL JOINT VENTURE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. Naik H.K,