Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Jewel - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

1843

Jewell's Lessee Vs. Jewell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1843

Jewell's Lessee v. Jewell - 42 U.S. 219 (1843) U.S. Supreme Court Jewell's Lessee v. Jewell, 42 U.S. 1


Dec 06 1887

Jewell Vs. Knight

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-06-1887

Jewell v. Knight - 123 U.S. 426 (1887) U.S. Supreme Court Jewell v. Knight, 123 U.S. 426 (1887) Jewell


May 11 1891

Woodward Vs. Jewell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-11-1891

Woodward v. Jewell - 140 U.S. 247 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Woodward v. Jewell, 140 U.S. 247 (1891) Woodward v. Jewell


18-section briefs on any result in this list

1876

Allore Vs. Jewell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1876

Allore v. Jewell - 94 U.S. 506 (1876) U.S. Supreme Court Allore v. Jewell, 94 U.S. 506 (1876) Allore v. Jewell


Jan 12 2023

Guru Jewellers vs Peeyar Jewellers

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-12-2023

POUSHA, 1944 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 18/2014 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT, THRISSUR PETITIONER/S: GURU JEWELLERS AGED 56 YEARS MULLACKAL, ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY PROPRIETOR, M.P GURUDHAYAL, S/O. PALANIYAPPAN, GURU NIVAS, MULLACKAL P.O, AMMANKOVIL STREET,


Nov 09 2022

Guru Jewellers vs Peeyar Jewellers

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Nov-09-2022

ORDER dtd.22.2.2020 in IA NOS.3970/2016 & 3971/2016 IN OS 18/2014 OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR] APPELLANT/PETITIONER/DEFENDANT: GURU JEWELLERS, MULLAKKAL, ALAPUZHA RERPESENTED BY PROPRIETOR M.P GURUDHAYAL, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. PALANIYAPPAN, GURU NIVAS, MULLACKAL P.O, AMMANKOVIL STREET,


May 15 2002

Prakash Jewellers Vs. A.K. Jewellers

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-15-2002

Reported in: 99(2002)DLT244; 2002(63)DRJ712

Khan, J. 1. The short question that falls for determination is whether petitioner's demand notice was served on respondent and whether trial court had wrongly or rightly dismissed his complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument...


Aug 26 2013

Senco Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. vs. New Senco'S Gold Queen Jewellers and Ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-26-2013

NO.2194 OF 201.CS NO.118 OF 199.IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SENCO JEWELLERS PVT.LTD.Versus NEW SENCO'S GOLD QUEEN JEWELLERS & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA Date :26. h August, 2013. MR.RAJ.BASU


Feb 04 2014

P P Jewellers Pvt Ltd Vs. Modern New Kapoor Jewellers Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-04-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1009/2012 % Order dated 04.02.2014 P P JEWELLERS PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Karan Jain, Advocate versus MODERN NEW KAPOOR JEWELLERS PVT LTD..... Defendant Through: Mr.Manish


Jan 10 2005

M.P.Jewellers Vs. New M.P. Jewellers Chawk Bazaar

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-10-2005

Marks by directing the Registrar of Trade Marks to expunge and cancel the respondents mark ‘NEW M P JEWELLERS under registration No.690610 dated 14.12.1999. The case of the applicant is that it is a registered partnership firm


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial