Jagat Singh V State - Judgment Search Results

Upender Singh vs.state & Ors

Court: Delhi

iron rod and danda used by Subhash Chand and Sandeep.36. In this context it may noticed that in Jagat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2011) 2 SCC234 the Supreme Court held that where the persons in both the groups

Sultan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2007(1)Raj257

learned Counsel for the appellant has relied upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jagat Singh v. State of Haryana reported in 1977 SCC (Cri) 95 wherein their Lordship of Supreme Court on the facts of

Subhash Chand vs.the State

Court: Delhi

iron rod and danda used by Subhash Chand and Sandeep.36. In this context it may noticed that in Jagat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2011) 2 SCC234 the Supreme Court held that where the persons in both the groups

Upender Singh & Anr vs.state

Court: Delhi

iron rod and danda used by Subhash Chand and Sandeep.36. In this context it may noticed that in Jagat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2011) 2 SCC234 the Supreme Court held that where the persons in both the groups

Upender Singh vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

iron rod and danda used by Subhash Chand and Sandeep.36. In this context it may noticed that in Jagat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2011) 2 SCC234 the Supreme Court held that where the persons in both the groups

Bharat Singh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2006(1)Raj9; 2006(1)WLC94

that Exception 1 of Section 300 IPC is attracted in the facts and circumstances of the case.20. In Jagat Singh v. State of Haryana : 1976CriLJ2002 , their Lordships of Supreme Court in para 4 observed thus:The circumstances in which

State of Orissa Vs. Udayanath Pradhan

Court: Orissa

as well as the evidence adduced by P.Ws.4, 5 and 6.10. In similar circumstances the apex Court in Jagat Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh reported in 2011(2) SCC 23.while acquitting the accused person from the charge under Section 302,

Bhikhan Bobla and ors. Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1963P& H255

held not to offend Articles 14 and 31(2) of the Constitution.In a Pull Bench case of this Court, Jagat Singh v. State of Punjab, 1962 (64) Pun LR 241 : (AIR 1962 Punj 221) (FB) wherein the vires of the

Satyapal and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1992CriLJ4061

640 (All); Jamuna Chaudhary v. State of Bihar, AIR 1974 SC 1822 : (1974 Cri LJ 890) and Jagat Singh v. State, 1984 Cri LJ 1551 (Delhi). It has been observed in these cases that injured person is the best

Narendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2003CriLJ703; RLW2003(2)Raj1098

any of the exceptions of Section 300 IPC and the conviction under Section 302 IPC was found proper.9. Jagat Singh v. State of Haryana (4), was the case wherein Umed Singh a student of Sir Chhotu Ram College of Education, … case. Following the ratio indicated by the Bench of Hon'ble Three Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jagat Singh v. State of Haryana (supra) we hold the appellant guilty under Section 304 Part-I IPC.11. We therefore modify the conviction