J - Judgment Search Results
J vs.j C
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2019
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:30. 01.2019 Judgment pronounced on:28. 02.2019 J J C MAT.APP(F.C.) 327/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.P. Singh
J vs.r
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
Date of Decision:9. h April, 2018 + MAT.APP. 62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with petitioner present in person versus Through: Ms. Vandana
R vs.j
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2018
Date of Decision:9. h April, 2018 + MAT.APP. 62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with petitioner present in person versus Through: Ms. Vandana
18-section briefs on any result in this list
S vs.j
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-17-2018
COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 750/2017 & CM No.25674/2017 Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 S J ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Anunaya Mehta, Advocates. versus Through: In person ..... Respondent CORAM:
J. Vs. Gokal and Co. and anr. V. G. R. Pewekar, Inspecting Assistant C ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-30-1990
Reported in: (1992)107CTR(Bom)180
T. D. SUGLA, J. :The counsel are agreed that the issue whether the Board was entitled in law to withdraw the approval
J Vs. Foods Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-19-2004
Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT478TriDel
Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise or the Asstt. Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction may allow in this regard. 28. I find that the certificates as per the condition attached to S.
Sebi Vs. J
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Mar-15-2007
referred to in short as "the Board") ordered an investigation into the dealings of many entities including M/s JVS Securities (P) Ltd., in the shares of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd (hereinafter referred to in short as "Ranbaxy"). M/s
J.L. Koul and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-27-2009
Reported in: JT2009(13)SC584; 2009(13)SCALE439; (2010)1SCC371; 2009AIRSCW7448
ORDER1. This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 14.3.1997 passed by the Division Bench of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court by which
J.H. Patel Vs. Subhan Khan
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-24-1996
Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)16; AIR1996SC3439; 3(1996)CLT173(SC); JT1996(6)SC633; 1996(5)SCALE434; (1996)5SCC312; [1996]Supp3SCR864
March 20, 1996, Civil Appeal No. 1795/96 was allowed and the impugned order of the High Court dated January 3, 1996, was set aside. The Civil Appeal No. 3677/96 which was actually cross objections filed by the
J.M. Bhatia, Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax and ors. V ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-19-1985
Reported in: AIR1986SC268; (1986)88BOMLR420; (1985)49CTR(SC)382; [1985]156ITR474(SC); 1985(2)SCALE845; (1985)4SCC655; [1985]Supp2SCR872; 1986(1)LC134(SC)
for our determination:Did the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Wealth-tax have the power to rectify his predecessor's order dated June 26, 1970 in view of the fact that there was no error apparent on the face of the
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free