J - Judgment Search Results

J vs.j C

Court: Delhi

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:30. 01.2019 Judgment pronounced on:28. 02.2019 J J C

J vs.r

Court: Delhi

62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with

R vs.j

Court: Delhi

62/2011 & C.M. Nos. 16979/2011, 19900/2016, 28099/2016 and 5315/2017 R J ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Advocate along with

S vs.j

Court: Delhi

& CM No.25674/2017 Date of Decision:17. h April, 2018 S J ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Anunaya Mehta,

J. Vs. Gokal and Co. and anr. V. G. R. Pewekar, Inspecting Assistant C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1992)107CTR(Bom)180

T. D. SUGLA, J. :The counsel are agreed that the issue whether the Board

J Vs. Foods Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT478TriDel

Commissioner of Central Excise, as the case may be, having jurisdiction may allow in this regard. 28. I find that the

Sebi Vs. J

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

an investigation into the dealings of many entities including M/s JVS Securities (P) Ltd., in the shares of Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd

J.L. Koul and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2009(13)SC584; 2009(13)SCALE439; (2010)1SCC371; 2009AIRSCW7448

This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment and order dated 14.3.1997 passed by the Division Bench of

J.H. Patel Vs. Subhan Khan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)16; AIR1996SC3439; 3(1996)CLT173(SC); JT1996(6)SC633; 1996(5)SCALE434; (1996)5SCC312; [1996]Supp3SCR864

allowed and the impugned order of the High Court dated January 3, 1996, was set aside. The Civil Appeal No. 3677/96

J.M. Bhatia, Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Wealth Tax and ors. V ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1986SC268; (1986)88BOMLR420; (1985)49CTR(SC)382; [1985]156ITR474(SC); 1985(2)SCALE845; (1985)4SCC655; [1985]Supp2SCR872; 1986(1)LC134(SC)

Wealth-tax have the power to rectify his predecessor's order dated June 26, 1970 in view of the fact that there was