J S D - Judgment Search Results

Mangala H J (S.D.a) vs Ravi

Court: Karnataka

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 397 OF 2026 BETWEEN: MANGALA H.J, (S.D.A) D/O LATE B.P. RAJU. AGED

Nayana J. S. D/O. Shiashankaraiah Vs. Sri. Pradeep S. C, and the Manag ...

Court: Karnataka

the offending vehicle the only point that remains for consideration is:Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and reasonable or does it call for enhancement?5. After hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the parties and … 1. This appeal is by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.2. For the sake of convenience parties are referred to as they … KA.01-P-2634 came from opposite side in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against the motorbike as a result the claimant sustained grievous injuries. Hence

Ladu Ram Jat Vs. C.J. (S.D.) C.J.M. and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj993; 2002(3)WLC555

Rathore, J. 1. For conducting the elections of Gram Panchayat, State of Rajaslhan has issued a notification dated 11th January, … Rathore, J. 1. For conducting the elections of Gram Panchayat, State of Rajaslhan has issued a notification dated 11th January, 2000 and in pursuance of the notification dated 11th … the elections of Gram Panchayat, State of Rajaslhan has issued a notification dated 11th January, 2000 and in pursuance of the notification dated 11th January,

Kunnamprath Payyantan Govindan, Karnavan and Manager of the Tarwad Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1938Mad581; (1938)1MLJ313

Venkatasubba Rao, J.1. In this Letters Patent Appeal from the judgment of King J., two questions of law have been argued. … Patent Appeal from the judgment of King J., two questions of law have been argued. In 1889, the suit property was leased by the then jenmi to the defendant's ancestor for a period of three years. While … 1889, the suit property was leased by the then jenmi to the defendant's ancestor for a period of three years. While the tenant was in