Iteration - Judgment Search Results
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh and anr. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-12-2004
Reported in: AIR2004SC346; 2004(3)BLJR1971; 2004CriLJ2050; (2004)2GLR1078; JT2004(Suppl1)SC94; 2004(4)SCALE375; (2004)4SCC158; 2004(2)LC1041(SC); [2004] 3 SCR 1050
Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The present appeals have several unusual features and some of them pose very serious questions of far reaching consequences. The case is commonly to be known as ''best Bakery Case''....
State of Uttranchal and anr. Vs. Prantiya Sinchai Avam Bandh Yogana Sh ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-12-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)AWC252(SC); [2008(116)FLR987]; 2008(3)JKJ101[SC]; JT2007(12)SC477; (2008)ILLJ295SC; 2007AIRSCW6807
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted.2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Uttaranchal High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellants.3. The factual position in...
Binani Industries Ltd., Kerala Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Commercia ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-04-2007
Reported in: JT2007(5)SC311; 2007(5)SCALE429; 2007(1)LC0515(SC); (2007)6VST783(SC); 2007AIRSCW3071; JT2007(5)SC311; 2007-08(6)VATToday128; 2007(2)KCCRSN81; 2007(4)AIRKarR295
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted in special leave petitions. 2. Challenge in these appeals is to the legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court holding that the Circular dated...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Md. Hayatul Isam Vs. State of Assam and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-22-2003
B.K. Sharma, J.1. Whether the Governing Body of a College could tinker with the selection made by the Selection Committee is the issue involved in this writ petition. The admitted position is that the petitioner was...
R.K. Talukdar (ic-35161f Lt. Co.) Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Jun-15-2007
at a frontier post.8. The respondent No. 5 in her application for vacation of the interim order while iterating the facts pertaining to the FIR, and the unsuccessful endeavours of the petitioner to obtain pre-arrest bail, averred
Karnataka Bank Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sunita B. Vatsaraj
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)BomCR891; (2007)109BOMLR1210; [2007(115)FLR217]
D.G. Karnik, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgement of a learned Single Judge of This Court dated 3rd March 1999 allowing the Writ Petition No. 225 of 1995 filed by the respondent and thereby...
The State of Maharashtra Vs. Haribhau Krishnaji Deshmukh and ors.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-13-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALD(Cri)111; 2003BomCR(Cri)1233; 2003CriLJ3639; 2003(4)MhLj1060
Palshikar, J. 1. By this appeal the State of Maharashtra has challenged the order passed on 25-2-1987 by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Sessions Case No. 106 of 1983 acquitting the accused of...
Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka V ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-02-2008
Reported in: AIR2008NOC2790(FB); ILR2008(3)KAR2895; 2008(4)KarLJ593; 2008(4)KLJ593; 2008(5)AIRKarR261; AIR2008NOC2790(FB)
ORDERN. Kumar, J.1. The destiny of India is now being shaped in her classrooms. In a world based on science and technology it is education that determines the level of prosperity, welfare and security of the...
Apsrtc, National Mazdoor Union Rep. by Its State Joint Secretary Vs. A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-08-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)ALD558; 2008(3)ALT173; [2008(118)FLR21]; (2008)IIILLJ399AP
ORDERC.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.1. The petitioner, a registered trade union sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus to declare notification dated 13.12.2007 issued by respondent No. 1 whereby it called for applications from entrepreneurs for...
Ram Kripal Singh Vs. U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Lucknow an ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Feb-18-1999
Reported in: 1999(2)AWC1147; [1999(81)FLR996]; (1999)IILLJ763All; (1999)2UPLBEC1617
N.K. Mitra, C. J. and D.K. Seth,J.1. The preliminary objection taken by Mr. Vivek Saran, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1. 2 and 3 is that the appeal is not maintainable under Chapter VIII, Rule...
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free