Issued - Judgment Search Results
issu Alias Ismile Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
Criminal Revision No.1382/12 12.12.2012. Shri Manish Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner. State/respondent by Shri Akshay Namdeo, learned PL. Learned PL appearing for the State prays for short time to call for the Surgical Expert Report. Let...
“i) to Issue a Writ of Certiorari for Quashing the Vs. Jagbir Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
under the 'river action', record has not been prepared, to affect consolidation, by the Revenue authorities, despite directions issued by this Court in CWP No.8979 of 2009 titled as 'Charan Singh and others v. State of Haryana
That Issue of Paddy to Be Limited to the Extent of Costs of Vs. Food C ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
within 20 days of issuance of released order. It is admitted by AW1 that department i.e.FCI has not issued any release order in one instance or 200 MT because rice in advance has to supplies by respondent
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“basically the Issue Involved in the Present Writ Petition Is Whethe ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-04-2014
P13), whereby respondent No.1 decided to maintain status quo on its earlier decision, regarding non extention of approval, issued vide order dated 31.12.2012, which was subsequently confirmed on 16.03.2013, in respect of the petitioner, on account of
The Only Issue on Which the Respondent No.1 Approached the Vs. Darshan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Court referred to in the order and thus opining that once the benefit of statutory Rules of 1991 issued by Union Territory of Chandigarh itself had given certain benefits to respondent No.1, they could not be taken
“The Issue Whether the Order Passed in Proceeding Under Section 7 Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
of the Act, has not been decided. Therefore, whether such land was used for common purposes was an issue, which is required to be decided by the Authorities under the Act. In view of the said finding,
While Issuing Notice of Motion the Following Order Was Passed Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station, Sohana, District S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali. While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 4.12.2013:- “The petitioners pray for grant
The Principal Issue Raised in the Present Petition Was a Vs. Union of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
respondents No.3 and 6 alongwith Annexures and the applications are allowed. CWP No.27324 of 2013 (O&M) The principal issue raised in the present petition was a grievance made by the petitioner on account of lack of enforcement
“all these Issues Are Taken Up Together Being Inter- Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-28-2014
dismissal of the suit was prayed for. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed by the trial Court: 1. Whether the plaintiff is owner of the land measuring 23 Kanals
In Re: Vs. To Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Defi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
presiding officers (in English wherever possible) so that readable true copies will be available straightaway and can be issued to both sides on the date of examination itself.3. The deposition of each witness must be recorded dividing
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free