Irrigation Work - Judgment Search Results

The Chief Engineer R.S.D.C. and S.K.P. Irrigation Works Punjab Vs. Chi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16779 of 1994 Date of decision:04.05.2013 The Chief Engineer, R.S.D.C. & S.K.P. Irrigation Works, Punjab Shahpurkandi & others .....Petitioners Versus Shri Attar Singh & others .....Respondents CWP No.10371 of 1998 Mr.Attar … & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16779 of 1994 Date of decision:04.05.2013 The Chief Engineer, R.S.D.C. & S.K.P. Irrigation Works, Punjab Shahpurkandi & others .....Petitioners Versus Shri Attar Singh & others .....Respondents CWP No.10371 of 1998 Mr.Attar Singh

Rakesh Kumar Contractor Vs. Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Works ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2001)2UPLBEC1322

petitioner on 10.3.1992 invoked the arbitration Clause 34 of the agreement. Sri Kuldeep Singh Sohan. Chief Engineer (Ganga), Irrigation Department, Sichai Bhawan, Vistoria Park, Meerut appointed himself as Sole Arbitrator on 17.7.1997. Notices were issued and proceedings … V.M. Sahai, J.1. The petitioner is a contractor. He executed some work in pursuance of a contract entered into between the petitioner and respondents No. 2 to 4. A dispute

Onkar Nath Dubey and ors. Vs. Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Work ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (1999)2UPLBEC1236

Matched in: Parties Onkar Nath Dubey and ors. Vs. Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Works Circle and anr.

M.L. Gera Vs. the Chief Engineer (D), Irrigation Work, Punjab and Chan ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1973P& H287

of the rules of natural justice.2. The petitioner was working as a Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Irrigation Branch, and respondent 4 was his immediate higher officer. It was represented to the Superintending Engineer, respondent 3, … that the impugned order has been passed in violation of the rules of natural justice.2. The petitioner was working as a Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Irrigation Branch, and respondent 4 was his immediate higher officer.