Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Irreversibly - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 05 2005

Research Foundation for Science Technology and Natural Resources Polic ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-05-2005

Reported in: (2005)3CompLJ193(SC); 2005(1)CTC609; 2005(192)ELT8(SC); [2005(2)JCR294(SC)]; JT2005(11)SC135; (2005)13SCC186; [2005] 1 SCR 115

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Considering the alarming situation created by dumping of hazardous waste, its generation and serious and irreversible damage as a result thereof to the environment, flora and fauna, and also having regard to the magnitude


May 06 2009

Naresh Shankar Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-06-2009

Reported in: AIR2009SC2450; JT2009(9)SC319; 2009(7)SCALE244:2009AIRSCW4569

Mukundakam Sharma, J.1. The present appeals arise out of judgment and order dated 10.11.2004 passed by the High Court of Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in Writ Petition No. 5171 of 2002 along with 13 other similar...


Mar 07 2011

Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-07-2011

Reported in: AIR2011SC1290

brain can take over the function of another part in certain situations where the other part has been irreversibly damaged). 108. Brain cells require regular supply of oxygen which comes through the red cells in the blood.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 29 2008

Punjab Aromatics Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-29-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)KLT673(SC); 2008(7)SCALE691; (2008)11SCC482; (2008)14VST519(SC); 2008AIRSCW3810

in the process of manufacture with the result, its identity must have been completely lost.12. The 'test of irreversibility' is an important criterion to ascertain as to when a given process amounts to manufacture. In the present


Nov 14 2006

Ravikant S. Patil Vs. Sarvabhouma S. Bagali

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-14-2006

Reported in: 2007(2)ALLMR(SC)443; 2007(2)CTC349; JT2006(10)SC578; 2007(1)KarLJ398; 2006(12)SCALE295

should be exercised only in exceptional circumstances where failure to stay the conviction, would lead to injustice and irreversible consequences.13. Reverting to the present case, we are not called upon to decide the correctness of the order


May 02 2008

Babulal Badriprasad Varma Vs. Surat Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-2008

Reported in: AIR2008SC2919; (2009)1GLR1(SC); JT2008(6)SC504; 2008(8)SCALE206; 2008AIRSCW4903; AIR2008SC2918

case disentitle himself from obtaining an equitable relief particularly when he allows a thing to come to an irreversible situation.25. Different statutes provide for different manner of service of notice. The Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 provides


Apr 25 2007

Fazilka Coop. Sugar Mills Vs. Jatinder Kumar Gupta and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-25-2007

Reported in: [2007(113)FLR978]; (2007)IILLJ835SC; (2007)147PLR96; 2007(6)SCALE192; (2007)9SCC194; 2007AIRSCW6299

Rs. 35 crores. In the facts and circumstances of the case the High Court's order in law is irreversible. But keeping in view the peculiar facts of the case we direct that in full and final settlement


Jan 10 2007

industrial Paper (Assam) Ltd. Emps. Union Vs. Management Assam Industr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-10-2007

Reported in: AIR2007SC985; JT2007(2)SC243; (2007)2LLJ549SC; 2007(2)SCALE328; (2007)3SCC73; 2007(3)SLJ20(SC); 2007AIRSCW752;

Single Judge and the Division Bench that AIDC cannot be saddled with the responsibility of those employees is irreversible. 10. The Memorandum and Article of Association of both AIDC and IPAL as well as the Certificate of


Sep 26 2005

Commissioner of Central Excise, Hyderabad-ii Vs. Aldec Corporation and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-26-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC3621; 2005(102)ECC469; 2005(188)ELT241(SC); JT2005(8)SC574; (2005)7SCC700

Tariff Act, 1985 on the other hand and, therefore, the decision taken by the department in 1986 was irreversible. In the reply, M/s Aldec Corporation contended that M/s VPI and M/s SREW were job processors, which position


Apr 30 2008

Punjab Aromatics Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-30-2008

Reported in: 2008(2)KLT673(SC); 2008(7)SCALE691; (2008)11SCC482; (2008)14VST519(SC); 2008AIRSCW3810

in the process of manufacture with the result, its identity must have been completely lost.12. The 'test of irreversibility' is an important criterion to ascertain as to when a given process amounts to manufacture. In the present


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial