Investment - Judgment Search Results
Consolidated Finvest & Investments Limited vs.jindal Photo Investments ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2016
AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 11.2016 Judgment pronounced on:19.12.2016 CO.PET. 220/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"CONSOLIDATED FINVEST & INVESTMENTS LIMITED... Petitioner /Transferor Company no.1 AND CONSOLIDATED GREEN FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner/Transferor Company No.2 AND JINDAL IMPERATIVE SPECIALIST
Boom Investments Private Limited vs.mohair Investment and Trading Comp ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-24-2016
In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 & the Companies Act, 2013 (to the extent applicable): Boom Investments Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferor Company WITH Mohair Investment and Trading Company Private Limited... Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr. N. Ganpathy,
Dove Investments Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. Gujarat Industrial Investme ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-30-2004
Reported in: [2005]124CompCas399(Mad); (2005)6CompLJ490(Mad); 2005(1)CTC249; (2005)1MLJ269; [2005]60SCL604(Mad)
J.1. By consent of all the parties, the Appeals themselves have (been) taken up for disposal. M/s. Dove Investments Private Limited, Mumbai-21; M/s. Max worth Investments Private Limited, Chennai-34; and Mr. P.N. Mohan, partner of M/s. Sandhya
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Shriram Investment Services Limited, Unit of Shriram Group of Companie ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-16-2006
Reported in: [2006]133CompCas830(Mad); (2006)4MLJ743
ORDERT.V. Masilamani, J.1. This Civil Revision Petition is preferred by Shriram Investment Services Limited (hereinafter called 'SISL') the respondent before the Arbitral Tribunal and Palki/Jeypad Investment (P) Ltd/Jeypad Investment (P)
Zodiac Investment Limited Vs. Durga Investment and Trading Co. and anr ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Mar-14-1988
Reported in: (1988)2CALLT395(HC),92CWN1081
Matched in: Parties Zodiac Investment Limited Vs. Durga Investment and Trading Co. and anr.
Uma Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-23-1976
Reported in: (1976)78BOMLR77; [1977]47CompCas242(Bom)
October, 1974. The ex parte orders were obtained under section 391(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, by Uma Investments Private Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the company') in an application filed by it under section 391 for
Canara Land Investments Ltd. Vs. Sea Rock Investments Ltd. and
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Jul-05-1999
Reported in: (2000)100CompCas516
Section 22A(4)(c) of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 ("the SCR Act") in the matter of Canara Land Investments Ltd. ("the company"). As the facts and circumstances in these petitions are similar, we are disposing of both
DolphIn Investment P. Ltd. Vs. C. Pinto Trade Commerce P. Ltd. and Shr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-07-2006
Reported in: 2007(3)ALLMR716; [2007]138CompCas74(Bom); (2007)3CompLJ433(Bom); [2008]81SCL16(Bom)
These petitions have been filed by the petitioner for the winding up of the respondent M/s. Shri Sahajanand Investment P. Ltd. ('M/s. Sahajanand', for short) who was the principal borrower and the respondent M/s. C. Pinto Trade
Ondal Investments Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-06-1978
Reported in: [1979]116ITR143(Cal)
Sen, J.1. The Ondal Investments Co. Ltd., the assessee, has initiated the above reference No. 10 of 1971. The other reference No. 19
London Investment and Mortgage Co. Ltd. Vs. Inland Revenue Commissione ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-06-1956
Reported in: [1958]34ITR43(Cal)
Matched in: Parties London Investment and Mortgage Co. Ltd. Vs. Inland Revenue Commissioners. London Investment and Mortgage Co. Ltd. V. F. N. Worthington (H. M. Inspector of Taxes).
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free