Investigating - Judgment Search Results

Ms. M. Manoj Kumar and Co. and Another Vs. Director of Income Tax (inv ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the warrant of authorization dated 11.06.2007 issued under Section 132A (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby respondent No.1...

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

powers conferred under Section 212(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, Sh. Prashant Baliyan, Dy. Director is appointed as Investigating Officer to carry out the above noted investigation. The Investigating Officer shall have the powers of Inspector as

National Investigation Agency Vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali

Court: Supreme Court of India

and financer and a number of cases were registered against him, which were being investigated by the sister investigating agencies. The High Court, however, noted that the charge­sheet neither gave details of the other cases registered and

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Nittin Johari

Court: Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1381 OF2019(@ S.L.P. (CRL.) No.7437 OF2019Serious Fraud Investigation Office …Appellant(s) Versus Nittin Johari & Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.Leave granted.2. The instant appeal challenges

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

in Bhikamchand Jain (supra). This Court held that in the event of investigation not being completed by the investigating authorities within the prescribed period, the accused acquires an indefeasible right to be granted bail, if he offers

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corpo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

and upon such transfer all documents and records are required to be transferred to SFIO by every other investigating agency.2. For completion of investigation, sub-section (12) of Section 212 does not contemplate any period.3. Under sub-section (11)

National Investigation Agency New Delhi Vs. Owais Amin @ Cherry

Court: Supreme Court of India

an individual, or a State, as the case may be. When the State undertakes the 13 exercise of investigating an offence, it does so on behalf of the public. Thus, any investigation in currency at the time

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]5S.C.R.485

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 485 : 2025 INSC 477 Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda (Criminal Appeal No. 1872 of 2025) 09 April 2025 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Prasanna

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485

[2025] 5 S.C.R. 485 : 2025 INSC 477Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Aditya Sarda (Criminal Appeal No. 1872 of 2025) 09 April 2025 [Bela M. Trivedi* and Prasanna

Crime Investigation Detective Trust vs.delhi Development Authority and ...

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.6728/2016 Date of decision :6. h September, 2017 CRIME INVESTIGATION DETECTIVE TRUST ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Krishna K. Singh, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ......