Investigate - Judgment Search Results

Ms. M. Manoj Kumar and Co. and Another Vs. Director of Income Tax (inv ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred against the warrant of authorization dated 11.06.2007 issued under Section 132A (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, whereby respondent No.1...

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

2008.3. AND whereas on the basis of opinion formed by the Central Government, it has been decided to investigate the affairs of following companies:- CIN COMPANY / LLP NAME1 U45201HR2000PLC045 738 ADARSH BUILDESTA TE LIMITED REGIO N

National Investigation Agency Vs. Zahoor Ahmad Shah Watali

Court: Supreme Court of India

a known hawala dealer and financer and a number of cases were registered against him, which were being investigated by the sister investigating agencies. The High Court, however, noted that the charge­sheet neither gave details of the

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Nittin Johari

Court: Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1381 OF2019(@ S.L.P. (CRL.) No.7437 OF2019Serious Fraud Investigation Office …Appellant(s) Versus Nittin Johari & Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.Leave granted.2. The instant appeal challenges

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Rahul Modi

Court: Supreme Court of India

expiry of 180 days, no charge-sheet had been submitted nor any application filed seeking extension of time to investigate, this Court held that the appellant was entitled to be released on statutory bail notwithstanding the subsequent filing

Serious Fraud Investigation Office Vs. Sahara Housing Investment Corpo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

communication was addressed by the SFIO to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs seeking permission under Section 219 to investigate the affairs of six other companies, namely: “(i) Aamby Valley Limited; (ii) Qing Ambay City Developers Corporation Ltd.;

National Investigation Agency New Delhi Vs. Owais Amin @ Cherry

Court: Supreme Court of India

COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2668 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.9052 of 2021) NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY NEW DELHI … APPELLANT(S) VERSUS OWAIS AMIN @ CHERRY & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT M. M. Sundresh,

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025]5S.C.R.485

2013 and Section 43(2) and (3)(c)(i) of Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 directed the SFIO to inquire and investigate into the affairs of 125 Companies of Adarsh Group (hereinafter referred to as “CIUs”). On 25.02.2019, the MCA

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485

2013 and Section 43(2) and (3)(c)(i) of Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 directed the SFIO to inquire and investigate into the affairs of 125 Companies of Adarsh Group (hereinafter referred to as “CIUs”). On 25.02.2019, the MCA

Crime Investigation Detective Trust vs.delhi Development Authority and ...

Court: Delhi

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.6728/2016 Date of decision :6. h September, 2017 CRIME INVESTIGATION DETECTIVE TRUST ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Krishna K. Singh, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ......