Intervening Cause - Judgment Search Results

Sri Sita Ram Sugar Mills Ltd., Baitalpur, District Deoria (U.P.) and D ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1670; (1960)ILLJ558SC

P.B. Gajendragadkar, J. 1. This appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute between the Appellant Sri Sitaram Sugar Mills Ltd., and its workmen, the respondents. The dispute in question was referred for adjudication...

Union of India Vs. Prince Muffakam Jah and Othersinterveners: Professo ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1995SC227; 1994(2)ARBLR503(SC); [1994]Supp4SCR582

ORDERS. Mohan, J.1. By this Intervention Application the interveners seek to:(i) restrain the Union of India from making any payment of the amount of

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. M/S. Pyare Lal Malhotra Etc. M/S. Durga Steel, ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1976)5CTR(SC)0278B

listing itself loses all meaning and would be without any purpose behind it.8. Learned Counsel appearing for an intervener argued that the chemical composition of iron and steel affords a clue to the meaning of 'Iron and

Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras Vs. Mir Mohammad Ali. Aruna Mills L ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1964]53ITR165(SC)

Gopalakrishnan, for the respondent. S. T. Desai, J. B. Dadachanji, O. C. Mathur and Ravinder Narain, for the intervenor. April 24, 1964. The judgment Of SUBBA RAo and SIKRI In, JJ. was delivered by SIKRI J. SHAH

Sudhir Chandra Nawn Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, Calcutta, and Others. Inte ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1968]69ITR897(SC)

SHAH J. - For the years 1959-60, 1960-61 and 1961-62 the petitioner was assessed to tax under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, by the Wealth-tax Officer C-Ward, District II(1) Calcutta. The petitioner failed to pay the tax...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Robert J. Sas and Others ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1963]48ITR177(SC)

KAPUR J. - These three appeals by special leave are brought against the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay. The appellant in all the three appeals is the Commissioner of Income-tax, but the...

Santosh Kumar JaIn Vs. the State Union of India (intervener)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1951SC201; 1951CriLJ757; [1951]2SCR303

Patanjali Sastri, J.1. This is an appeal from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dismissing a revision petition against the conviction of the appellant for an offence under s. 186 of the...

Rambhau Jairam Dhamange Vs. Vinkur Co-operative Society Ltd. (by Its P ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1967(14)FLR27]

or national tribunal, as the case may be, records the opinion, that they were so summoned without proper cause; (c) where a party referred to in Clause (a) or (b) is an employer, his heirs, successors or … of 1965 and Special Civil Application No. 443 of 1964 - filed in Bombay have been allowed to intervene. The facts of Special Civil Application No. 161 of 1965 are similar to those of Special Civil Application

The Commissioner of Customs (i) , Mumbai-ii Vs. Abdul Hassan Mohamed K ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

order wherein the Commissioner has not ordered redemption fine since re-export was allowed. 2. In this case the intervener M/s.Lombard North Central PLC has also filed an application for issuance of direction to the Commissioner of Customs

The Labour Relations Board of Saskatchewan Vs. John East Iron Works Lt ...

Court: Privy Council

Reported in: AIR1949PC129

by the findings of the Board and shall make such order or orders as may be necessary to cause every party with respect to whom the application is made to comply with the order of the Board