Interpretation - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Mead Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on a background assumption that chevron deference would generally be accorded only to agency interpretations arrived at through formal adjudication notice andcomment rulemaking or other procedures assuring fairness ..... s 244 1991 it was again unnecessary to our holding whether the agency s interpretation of the statute warranted chevron deference since the longstanding canon of statutory construction .....

Stenberg Vs. Carhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the common understanding of partial birth abortion and the principle that statutes will be interpreted to avoid constitutional difficulties would require one to read substantial otherwise see infra at ..... the lower courts ran afoul of the well established principle that statutes will be interpreted to avoid constitutional difficulties id at 483 citations omitted frisby then identifies exactly why .....

Bush Vs. Gore

Court: US Supreme Court

..... meaning is enough to displace the legislative provision and violate article ii statutes require interpretation which does not without more affect the legislative char 131 acter of a statute ..... justice ginsburg has persuasively explained in her own dissenting opinion our customary respect for state interpretations of state law counsels against rejection of the florida court s determinations in this .....

Tisco Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT104TriDel

..... express provisions redundant or superfluous the collector has held that the notification cannot be interpreted ignoring the relevance of the expression workshop the order also observes that it is ..... fact an exemption provision is like an exception and on normal principle of construction or interpretation of statutes it is construed strictly either because of legislative intention or on economic .....

Fda Vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a particular statutory provision in isolation rather it must place the provision in context interpreting the statute to create a symmetrical and coherent regulatory scheme gustafson v alloyd co ..... i believe that tobacco products fit within this statutory language 162 in its own interpretation the majority nowhere denies the following two salient points first tobacco products including cigarettes .....

Christensen Vs. Harris County

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is an anachronism dating from an era in which we declined to give agency interpretations including interpretive regulations as opposed to legislative rules authoritative effect see eeoc v arabian american ..... reasons 1 the statute is unambiguous so there is no room for administrative interpretation 2 no interpretation has been made by personnel of the agency responsible for administering the statute .....

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

..... overriding interest in fundamental fairness the likelihood of a different outcome attributable to an incorrect interpretation of the law should be regarded as a potential windfall to the defendant rather ..... be substantially different from the relevant precedent of this court the fourth circuit s interpretation of the contrary to clause accurately reflects this textual meaning a state court decision .....

Babu Premarajan Vs. Superintendent of Police, Kasaragode and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2000Ker417

..... iyer who was then the law minister of kerala the main controversy was regarding the interpretation of the words order interlocutory or intermediate order final order and judgment the contention ..... well recognised import in the general law should be accepted as confining the meaning in interpreting the constitution if the expression undischarged insolvent has acquired a special meaning under the then .....

State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu, Represented by I ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ469

..... construction that the purpose of the notification to promote industrialisation must be paramount in the interpretation and accordingly the g o ms no 500 which was brought into existence for ..... all these questions would become relevant where there is any difficulty or ambiguity about the interpretation where the words are extremely clear and unambiguous they cannot be given unnatural meaning in .....

Miller Vs. French

Court: US Supreme Court

..... addition the surrounding procedural provlslons are most naturally read as favoring the flexible interpretation the immediately preceding provision requires the court to rule promptly upon the motion to ..... provided in the statute fails to control district court error the same interpretation avoids the improper provisional termination of relief that is constitutionally necessary the risk of .....