Interpretation - Judgment Search Results

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC)

..... the court does not rush in to demolish provisions where judicial endeavour amelioratively interpretational may achieve both constitutionality and compassionate resurrection this salutary strategy the learned judge ..... either because he is a surplus inefficient disobedient and dangerous 118 construction or interpretation of legislative or rule provisions proceeds on the assumption that courts must seek .....

California Vs. Ferc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deference the court must accord to longstanding and well entrenched decisions especially those interpreting statutes that underlie complex regulatory regimes there has been no sufficient intervening change ..... deference this court must accord to longstanding and well entrenched decisions especially those interpreting statutes that underlie complex regulatory regimes adherence to precedent is in the .....

Davis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... above there are strong indications that congress intended a more specific meaning moreover petitioners interpretations would tend to undermine the purposes of 170 by allowing taxpayers to claim ..... also correlate them with the records of the third party to the extent petitioners interpretation lessens the likelihood that claimed charitable contributions actually served a charitable purpose it is .....

Board of Educ. Vs. Mergens

Court: US Supreme Court

..... clubs at westside were curriculum related the court of appeals noted that the broad interpretation advanced by the westside school officials would make the equal access act meaningless and ..... different definitions and thus both petitioners and respondents can cite to legislative history favoring their interpretation of the phrase compare 130 cong rec 19223 1984 statement of sen hatfield curriculum .....

Crandon Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... being unentitled to what might be called ex officio deference under chevron this expansive administrative interpretation of 209 a is not even deserving of any persuasive effect any responsible lawyer ..... are brought thus to give persuasive effect to the government s expansive advice giving interpretation of 209 a would turn the normal construction of criminal statutes upside down replacing .....

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Vs. Rabindra Chandra Chamaria and ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1990)1CALLT373(HC)

..... no intelligible differential to justify such classification there is one fundamental principle of interpretation if two interpretations of a provision are possible the one that would make it constitutional ..... particular reference to provident fund act we have already considered the principles of interpretation with particular reference to the welfare legislations the provident fund act imposes some .....

Dole Vs. United Steelworkers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to information it collected for law enforcement purposes nor did the securities and exchange commission interpret that act to apply to information the sec collected for possible disclosure by the ..... third parties specified information that is not delivered to the agency itself omb regulations so interpret the act the regulations also plainly reach the hazard communications standards that osha has .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Banque Nationale De Paris

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1991)91CTR(Bom)163; [1992]194ITR167(Bom)

..... in the gross total income the supreme court overruled its earlier interpretation of section 80m in the case of cloth traders pvt ..... be considered on its own language and its own context the interpretation put upon previous similar sections by courts need not be automatically ..... in the present case however we are not concerned with the interpretation of any of the sections referred to in these two supreme .....

Sullivan Vs. Everhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... regulations these terms do not necessarily embrace all collection methods the secretary has reasonably interpreted adjustment to mean a reduction in future payments and recovery to mean refund pp ..... constructions which are contrary to clear congressional intent we defer to the administrator s interpretation of a statute only after employing traditional tools of statutory construction 467 u s .....

Boyde Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... through lengthy exhortation will draw that meaning from the plethora of less damaging interpretations we find no objectionable prosecutorial argument in this case petitioner maintains that ..... instructions the majority finds no objectionable prosecutorial argument that would reinforce an impermissible interpretation of factor k although the prosecutor never suggested that the background and character .....