Interpretation - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: interpretation Year: 1910 Page 1 of about 219 results (0.021 seconds)Mohadev Aon Vs. Chairman of the Howrah Municipality
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-26-1910
Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.410
..... 6 3 85 arable land whether a holding within section 6 clause 3 whether assessable interpretation of tatutes proviso as guide to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBatasi Lal Vs. Arjun Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-28-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.777
..... in this court will include fees on the higher scale pre emption wajib ul arz interpretation sharik hakiat deh meaning of partition effect of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagannath Prasad and ors. Vs. Rustam Ali and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-11-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.98
..... land bearing timber lease to cut timber and convert it into charcoal wajib ul arz interpretation cantonments act c a no 41 2006 section 346 cantonment fund servants rules 1937 rules .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGirwardhari and anr. Vs. Jai NaraIn and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-04-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.39
..... can be dismissed after being admitted any other sufficient cause and satisfied by the debtor interpretation of latter part of section 15 1 refers only to petitions by creditors object of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPemmaraju Venkiah Garoo Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Counci ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-28-1910
Reported in: 6Ind.Cas.727
..... the true construction of the subject matter of this lease the primary canon of this interpretation of a deed or grant where there is a conflict between the description of the ..... abdur rahim j 11 i agree in the order proposed by the learned chief justice interpretation of document description of property by boundaries and by area lessor and lessee failure of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWeems Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1910
..... same meaning and so held that the provision prohibiting cruel and unusual punishments must be interpreted as the eighth amendment has been what constitutes a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited ..... to give to the words their constitutional significance the ruling now made therefore is an interpretation of the eighth amendment and announces the limitation which that amendment imposes on congress .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHertz Vs. Woodman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-31-1910
..... constantly increasing surplus indeed this case presents even a stronger contrast under the rule of interpretation announced in eidman v martinez a law providing for the exigencies of war cannot prevail ..... the judicial decisions and gave its legislation as i think the certain meaning that the interpretation of the prior enactments afforded section 8 provides as follows that all taxes or duties .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Second Grade Pleaders
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-19-1910
Reported in: (1910)20MLJ500
..... and three learned judges of this court have expressed themselves in favour of the unrestricted interpretation of clause f section 13 i have asked myself the question whether there is sufficient ..... for special condemnation the doctrine of ejusdem generis which has been invoked for the limited interpretation of clause f is not of universal application 16 hardcastle on statutory law quoting anderson .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCorporation of Calcutta Vs. Binoy Krishna Bose
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-06-1910
Reported in: 7Ind.Cas.890
..... corporation that the term building admits of a very comprehensive interpretation and that consequently we ought not to exclude a compound ..... framed for similar purposes the term building has not been usually interpreted in its derivative sense for instance in wendon v london ..... that the view we take is in accord with the interpretation put upon the statute by the municipal authorities themselves till .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna Chandra Basu and ors. Vs. Mohendra Nath Basu and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-11-1910
Reported in: 9Ind.Cas.704
..... respondents has suggested that this means levied according to the terms of the contract this interpretation is clearly inadmissible because before the lease was granted no cesses admittedly were or could ..... lands the additional burden would be borne by the landlords in the second place an interpretation of this character would be so obviously unreasonable and so manifestly detrimental to the interest .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial