Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Intensely - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 14 2026

Intense Technologies Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-14-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 524/2025 INTENSE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Bhargava, Mr. Abhinay Tiwari & Ms. Vennela Reddy, Advs.versusBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED


Feb 05 2026

Intense Technologies Limited vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-05-2026

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 05.02.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 501/2025 INTENSE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhinay Tiwari, Ms. Vennela Reddy and Mr. Mayank Bhargava, AdvocatesversusBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED


Oct 31 2007

Handloom Intensive Development Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow

Decided on: Oct-31-2007

Reported in: (2008)114TTJLuck416

for refund of tax amount of Rs. 1,72,000 which reads as under: I, A.K. Gupta, Director of Handloom Intensive Dev. Project (Bijnore) Ltd. do hereby state that my total income computed in accordance with the provisions of


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 08 2003

Jawahar Lal Vs. Project Officer, Intensive Sheep and Wool Development ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jul-08-2003

Reported in: (2003)3UPLBEC2276

Class IV employee vide appointment order dated 11.7.1990 (Annexure-I to the writ petition) passed by the Project Officer, Intensive Sheep and Wool Development Project, Mirzapur (the respondent) in the pay scale of 750/- to 940/- vide order


Sep 18 2013

“5. in the Present Case I Have Intensively Vs. State of Punjab and A ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-18-2013

order passed by the Appellate Authority reads in the following terms:- “5. In the present case, I have intensively considered the file of departmental inquiry and remarks which were given by department. At the time of personal


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial