Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Institutions - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 2019

Triumphant Institute of Management Education Pvt Ltd vs.time Plus Inst ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2019

$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 87/2019 TRIUMPHANT INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION PVT LTD Through Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Bitika Sharma, Ms. Anusuya Nigam,


Aug 22 2019

The Chartered Institute of Taxation vs.institute of Chartered Tax Advi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2019

(for exemption), 11441/2019 [u/O XI R-1(4) of CPC]. & 11440/2019 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC). IAs No.11442/2019 THE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF TAXATION .... PLAINTIFF Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naqeeb Nawab & Mr. Himanshu Deora,


Apr 23 2026

National Healthcare Institute and Medical Research Centre vs Max Healt ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M)-IPD 22/2026, CM 104/2026 & CM 105/2026 NATIONAL HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE AND MEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arnav Goyal, Advocate.versusMAX HEALTHCARE INSTITUTE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raunaq Kamath,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 07 2004

Indian Institute of Science Sc/St Employees Welfare Association (Regd. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-07-2004

Reported in: 2004(5)KarLJ352

1996 and petitioner in W.P. No. 3349 of 1997. It claims to represent the employees of the Indian Institute of Science belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.First respondent herein ('Institute or Employer') was the first respondent


Nov 08 2011

islamia Institute of Technology, Represented by Its Administrator Vs. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Nov-08-2011

by way of subsistence allowance. Apparently the pendency of the proceeding would mean from the date of its institution up to the final order disposing off the petition. 11. In Dena Bank and in Regional Authority DENA


Jan 17 2012

islamia Institute of Technology Vs. Islamia Institute of Technology

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-17-2012

VIKRAMAJIT SEN, C.J. 1. This appeal assails the Order of the learned Single Judge dated 08.11.2011 allowing Interlocutory Application No.10 of 2011 in W.P.No.37490/2010 and 40967-41032/2010 and directing the appellant to pay the wages last drawn...


Sep 12 2013

Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Vs. Post Graduate Institu ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-12-2013

HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Sr.No.210 Case No.: C.R.No.7704 of 2012 Date of Decision : Sept. 12, 2013 Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER).Chandigarh ...Petitioner versus Mehma Singh ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL * *


Oct 16 2012

Sardar Patel Institute Employees Union Vs. Sardar Patel Institute of E ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Oct-16-2012

extended to the employees of the government, the semi government bodies, Panchayats and the employees of all other institutions mentioned in the Resolution. It is the grievance of the petitioner herein that the said benefit is not


Jan 11 1999

Indian Institute of Science Employees' Association Bangalore Vs. India ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-11-1999

Reported in: 1999(3)KarLJ240

ORDER1. Heard the learned Counsel for the revision petitioner Sri T. Narayanaswamy and Sri Padubidri Raghavendra Rao, learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. This revision arises from the order under Order 16, Rule 5 of the...


Aug 27 1998

The Indian Institute of Science Employees' Association, Bangalore Vs. ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-27-1998

Reported in: ILR1998KAR3418; 1998(6)KarLJ364

has no monopoly therein (paragraph 161). It has further been held that (paragraph 169 at 2246).-'The private educational institutions merely supplement the effort of the State in educating the people as explained above. It is not an


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial