Instanter - Judgment Search Results
Handi Instant Foods Vs. State of A.P.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-15-2006
Reported in: 2007CriLJ1112
under the Act.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of this Court in Handi Instant Foods, Chennai v. State of A.P. (Cri. P. No. 2502 of 2003, dated 29-3 2006), wherein the prosecution
“that the Instant Writ Petition Deserves to Be Dismissed on the Vs. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
No.1 of the Preliminary Objections, CWP No.11734 of 2012 -2- it is stated as under :- “That the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground that the answering respondent is not at fault for
“In the Instant Case the Learned Lower Court Which Passed the Ex-par ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-06-2014
No.1. MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR, J.(Oral) Tersely, the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant revision petition and emanating from the record, are that, initially, respondent No.1-plaintiff Nazar Singh s/o Midda Singh (for
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-29-2014
Singh Virk, Advocate for the complainant. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.203
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-21-2014
Mr.Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.1055
“The Instant Petition Has Been Preferred Under Vs. State of Punjab - ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-28-2014
District Mohali. On 11.4.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in FIR
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section 438 Vs. the State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-10-2014
Mr.Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
District Jalandhar. On 2.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.139, dated
“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
City Yamunanagar. On 2.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR
Boc India Ltd. Vs. Instant Sales Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-17-2007
Reported in: AIR2007Cal275,2007(4)CHN392
ORDERJyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order being No. 29 dated 22nd January, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 6th Court at...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free