Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Instanter - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 15 2006

Handi Instant Foods Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-15-2006

Reported in: 2007CriLJ1112

under the Act.3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on a judgment of this Court in Handi Instant Foods, Chennai v. State of A.P. (Cri. P. No. 2502 of 2003, dated 29-3 2006), wherein the prosecution


Nov 26 2012

“that the Instant Writ Petition Deserves to Be Dismissed on the Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-26-2012

No.1 of the Preliminary Objections, CWP No.11734 of 2012 -2- it is stated as under :- “That the instant writ petition deserves to be dismissed on the ground that the answering respondent is not at fault for


Mar 06 2014

“In the Instant Case the Learned Lower Court Which Passed the Ex-par ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-06-2014

No.1. MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR, J.(Oral) Tersely, the facts and material, culminating in the commencement, relevant for deciding the instant revision petition and emanating from the record, are that, initially, respondent No.1-plaintiff Nazar Singh s/o Midda Singh (for


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 29 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-29-2014

Singh Virk, Advocate for the complainant. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.203


May 21 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-21-2014

Mr.Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.1055


May 28 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Preferred Under Vs. State of Punjab - ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-28-2014

District Mohali. On 11.4.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners in FIR


Jul 10 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section 438 Vs. the State ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-10-2014

Mr.Vikas Malik, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. *** Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J. (Oral) This order shall dispose of the instant petition preferred under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for the grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner in case FIR


Jul 23 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Punj ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-23-2014

District Jalandhar. On 2.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.praying for anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.139, dated


Jul 28 2014

“The Instant Petition Has Been Filed Under Section Vs. State of Hary ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-28-2014

City Yamunanagar. On 2.5.2014, while issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court:- “The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.seeking the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR


Jul 17 2007

Boc India Ltd. Vs. Instant Sales Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jul-17-2007

Reported in: AIR2007Cal275,2007(4)CHN392

ORDERJyotirmay Bhattacharya, J.1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against an order being No. 29 dated 22nd January, 2007 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, 6th Court at...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial