Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Instancy - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 23 2001

Rajeev Indravadan Modi and ors. Vs. Instance Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. an ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jan-23-2001

Reported in: (2001)3GLR2010

A.L. Dave, J. 1. This is a revision application preferred by the revisioners, who are the original plaintiffs in Civil Suit No. 11 of 2000 pending in District Court, at Vadodara. That suit is preferred by...


May 19 2022

Sri Tamarai Kannan Vs. State At The Instance Of Assistant

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-19-2022

NAMAKKAL DISTRICT TAMIL NADU ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI DESU REDDY G, ADVOCATE) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA AT THE INSTANCE OF DRUGS INSPECTOR MANDYA CIRCLE MANDYA - 571 402. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI VINAYAKA V.S., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL


May 19 2022

Sri Tamarai Kannan Vs. State At The Instance Of Assistant Of Drugs

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-19-2022

NAMAKKAL DISTRICT TAMIL NADU ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI DESU REDDY G, ADVOCATE) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA AT THE INSTANCE OF DRUGS INSPECTOR MANDYA CIRCLE MANDYA - 571 402. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI VINAYAKA V.S., HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 01 2006

Sadichha Mahila Mandal Vs. State of Maharashtra at the Instance of Sec ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-01-2006

Reported in: 2006(2)ALLMR488; 2006(3)BomCR107; 2006(2)MhLj528

D.G. Karnik, J.1. Shri. S. S. Lanke learned counsel for the petitioner is absent when called.2. By this petition, the petitioner challenges the order dated September 15, 1997 passed by the respondent No. 1 (Mr. Haribhau...


Feb 08 2007

Fardeen Feroz Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi), at the Instance of Narcot ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-08-2007

Reported in: (2007)109BOMLR358; 2007CriLJ1758

Control Bureau and has submitted that the seized cocaine was brought by the accused No. 1 at the instance of accused No. 2 for sale to accused No. 2 and thereby accused No. 1 and 2 have


Mar 17 2009

Prakash Dattaram Talwadkar Vs. State of Maharashtra at the Instance of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-17-2009

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR1767

who were accompanying the Appellant at the time of the incident. The recovery of the knife at the instance of accused No. 4 Shashikant was also disbelieved as an independent panch witness had not been examined. The


Apr 16 2009

Rajesh A. Behere and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra (at the Instance of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-16-2009

Reported in: 2009(111)BomLR1922

by itself would not persuade the Court to disbelieve the fact of recovery of incriminating articles at the instance of the accused. The items recovered particularly the gupti, Article B were duly identified by PW1 and PW8


Apr 28 2009

Dashrath Bapu Shinde, Vs. the State of Maharashtra at the Instance of ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-28-2009

Reported in: 2009CriLJ4708

the investigation, the investigating agency must submit itself to the scrutiny of the public prosecutor in the first instance and satisfy him about the progress of the investigation and furnish reasons for seeking further custody of an


Jun 21 2004

Abdul Gafoor Usman Gani Vs. the State of Maharashtra at the Instance o ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-21-2004

Reported in: 2004(4)MhLj311

D.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard Mrs. Ansari for the Appellant - Original Accused No. 2 and Mr. More Additional P.P. for the State.2. This Appeal is filed by the appellant original accused No. 2 against conviction...


Jul 14 2006

Jagannath Singh Vs. Dr. Shri Ajay Upadhyay and the State of Maharashtr ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-14-2006

Reported in: 2006CriLJ4274

D.G. Deshpande, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned-APP for the State.2. The Respondent No. 1 has filed a Criminal Complaint before the JMFC, Bhiwandi, against the accused for breach of trust...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial