Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Page 1 of about 256 results (0.881 seconds)

Ajay Pratap Singh. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

..... 977/- and had violated the provisions of insecticides act by selling damaged insecticides.3. after registering first information report, the police conducted investigation and finally on 30.11.1989 submitted chargesheet under sections 409, 468, 471 and 120b of the indian penal code and section 18 of the insecticides act, 1968. after submission of the chargesheet, cognizance was ..... (supra) also makes it clear that roving inquiry and fishing enquiry is impermissible.9. so far as the plea of violation of section 31 of the insecticides act is concerned, the court is in agreement with the submission advanced by the learned additional public prosecutor that in the present case the ..... first information report was registered, it was registered for the offences under sections 409, 420, 478 and 471 of the indian penal code and sections 412 and 120 of the indian penal code and section 18 of the insecticides act was added subsequently and there is specific allegation in the first information report .....

Crop Care Federation of India and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... impugning an order dated 08.01.2019 passed by the central government (appellate authority), rejecting the appeal preferred by the petitioners under section 10 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereafter the insecticides act ). the petitioners had preferred the said appeal against the decision of the registration committee (hereafter rc ) taken at its 370th ..... meeting held on 15.10.2016, to grant registration under section 9(3) of the insecticides act in respect w.p.(c) 8117/2019 page 1 ..... any application for grant of such registration. the petitioners had contended that in the circumstances, the grant of provisional registration under section 9(3b) of the insecticides act was without jurisdiction.13. on 18.07.2016, the petitioners also made a representation to rc alleging various deficiencies in the .....

Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

..... themselves impinge on the fundamental rights of a citizen of india, the same can be challenged appropriately. according to me, for valid imposition of such a condition on importers, section 38 of the insecticides act, 1968 should have been qualified by words like, "subject to provisions of the export-import policy", "except otherwise provided for in any other law for the time being in ..... the insecticides act, 1968. they have no powers to direct the authorities under the insecticides act, 1968 to do something, which the authorities under the insecticides act, 1968 are not obliged to do as per the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968. if boric acid is imported for the purposes other than for use as an insecticide, the authorities under the insecticides act, 1968, are not legally obliged to entertain an application for registration under section 9 .....

Dr. Ashok Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC2298; JT1997(5)SC151; 1997(3)SCALE782; (1997)5SCC10; [1997]Supp1SCR14; 1997(2)LC127(SC)

..... in the two transferred cases, the notification dated 1.1.1996 of the central government issued in exercise of powers under sub-section (2) of section 27 of the insecticides act, 1968 phasing out progressively the manufacture and use of benzene hexachloride and directing that the certificate of registration in respect of benzene hexachloride ..... page - 115).12. benzene hexachloride, otherwise known as bhc is an insecticide specified in the schedule to the insecticides act, 1968 and is different from its formulations which would also be an insecticide within the meaning of section 3(e)(iii) of the said insecticides act, bhc is not used as such by farmer or consumer though its ..... must be rejected. before we part with this case, and having examined the different provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 we find that once a substance is specified in the schedule as contemplated under section 3(e)(i) then there is no power for cancelling the registration certification issued in respect of the .....

Rallis India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1998CriLJ3593; 1998(3)WLC373; 1997WLC(Raj)UC682; 1998(1)WLN305

..... of m/s. rallis india limited and therefore, it should be presumed that they were incharge of the affairs of the company for the purpose of sub-section (3) of section 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 and in any case it may be presumed that the alleged offence was committed with their consent or connivance or on account of their neglect as contemplated by ..... complaint in the court of chief judicial magistrate, bhilwara against m/s. kotri charbhujanath kraya vikraya sahkari samiti ltd. and ors. and alleged therein the commission of offence punishable under section 29(1)(ka) of the insecticides act, 1968. on the basis of that complaint, the learned chief judicial magistrate by his order dated 22nd february '95 took cognizance of the offence under .....

Dr. Cheeran Abraham Varghese Vs. Maulvi Ab. Hamid

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1990CriLJ533

..... of property. the special act i.e. the insecticides act does not at all deal with these offences which are independent of that ..... or inducing a person with dishonest intention to part with money, to purchase sub-standard insecticides which has the effect of causing wrongful loss to a person who parts with the money is not an offence grouped under section 29 of the insecticides act of 1968.11. offences punishable under sections 419 and 420 rpc relate to cheating by personation and cheating by dishonestly inducing delivery .....

Northern Minerals Limited Vs. Plant Protection Officer and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ159

..... april, 1991 itself, the shelf life of the product ultimately expired in july, 1991; and for that reason, petitioner's right granted to him under section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 was rendered illusory. 8. in reply, counsel for the state has stated that although admittedly, the application for reanalysis was moved by the petitioner on 11th ..... 1990 itself. according to the counsel for the petitioner, this request for reanalysis was made well within the period of 28 days as prescribed under section 24(3) of the insecticides act, 1968. in addition, it is also contended that on the very first appearance before the court on 11th march, 1991, an application was moved by the ..... a futile exercise and an abuse on the process of the court. consequently, complaint no. 30/01/91 dated 19.01.1991 under section 200 cr.pc read with section 29(1)(a) of the insecticides act, 1968 and the prosecution launched against the petitioner in that behalf, are quashed.15. the petition is disposed of.crl. m.a. no .....

Knight Queen Industries (P) Ltd. Through Its Authorised Signatory Sh. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [2006]145STC226(All)

..... be the trade name, the petitioners are using chemicals for manufacturing the finished goods which have been treated as 'insecticides' under the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 and photostate copies of the certificate of registration of the license issued under section 9(4) of the 'insecticide' act, 1968 have been placed before us. the said certificate has been issued by government of india, ministry of agriculture- (department ..... of agriculture & cooperation) directorate of plant protection, quarantine and storage). a perusal of it leaves no scope of doubt that allethrin which is used in the product sold by the petitioners is 'insecticide'.(iv) insecticides rules, 1971 .....

Union of India Vs. Maliakkal Industrial Enterprises

Court : Kerala

..... questions, which arise for our consideration, essentially would appear to us as follows: i). whether an insecticide, which has non-insecticidal uses, can be regulated in view of section 38 of the insecticides act 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act' for short). ii). whether the policy of the government as manifested in ext.p5 produced in these ..... /6/2011 issued by the central board of excises and customers therein after referring to section 38 of the act , it is stated as follows: " as may be seen, the aforementioned provisions of the said section 38 of the insecticides act, 1968 are unambiguous and leave no scope interpretation. essentially, the exemption from the provisions of ..... 2012 & others 42 of items listed under schedule 3 of the said act that are intended to be used for these purposes that are specified i the said section 38 would be outside the ambit of the provisions contained in insecticides act, 1968. the implication is that the clearance of such imported items would not be .....

Northern Minerals Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR722

..... quality and that permission be obtained from the court so that the sample could be sent for re-analysis in accordance with the provisions of section 24 (3) and (4) of the insecticides act, 1968 and the rules made thereunder. petitioner no. 2 made an application annexure p-7 dated 26.9.1991 to the ilaqa magistrate, jagadhri ..... 1991 in the court of judicial magistrate, jagadhri under section 29 of the insecticides act, 1968 and the rules made thereunder for the violation of section 3(k)(i) of the insecticides act, 1968, urging that they have been deprived of their valuable right granted to them under section 24(3) of the insecticides act for no fault on their part and therefore the ..... be paid by the complainant or the accused, as the court shall direct.'6. it is clear from the bare reading of the provisions of section 24 of the insecticides act, 1968 that right given for re-analysis of the sample is a valuable right which cannot be taken away by the prosecution. if this guarantee to the .....