Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Page 5 of about 256 results (0.037 seconds)

Jhajhan Lal Gupta, Director and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1997CriLJ190

..... s bansal radio and company, ellenabad, adcalerof the aforesaid insecticide being manufactured by petition no. 2 and purchased samples of the said insecticide having manufacturing date feb. 1989 and expiry date july, 1990, in accordance with the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act). on being analysed the said sample was declared mis- ..... stated the sample was found to be misbranded and as such the complaint cannot be quashed. it has been further stated that the provisions of section 24 of the act have been complied with by the respondent and the complaint cannot be quashed on this ground as well.5. i have heard learned counsel for ..... manufacturer can get the sample re-tested before launching prosecution against him except in subsection (3) whereby he can challenge the report of the insecticide analyst only. section 24 of the act confers two rights i.e. the right to challege the correctness of the report of the analysis on the receipt of the show cause .....

Shivkumar Alias Shiwalamal Narumal Chugwani Proprietor of Kanhaiya Gen ...

Court : Mumbai

..... be found in other enactments, which frustrates the smooth implementation of these enactments.the insecticides act, 1968(d) section 29 of the insecticides act reads thus:offences and punishment. (1) whoever (a) imports, manufactures, sells, stocks or exhibits for sale or distributes any insecticide deemed to be misbranded under subclause (i) or subclause (iii) or subclause ..... me in implementing the penal provisions of (i) the insecticides act, 1968 and (ii) the drugs and cosmetics act 1940 besides pointing out the changes required in these laws due to change in social order.the seeds act, 1966(a) section 19 of the seeds act reads as under:penalty - if any person (a) ..... in the offences taking place in relation to prevention of food adulteration act 1954, the seeds act 1966, the insecticides act 1968 and the drugs and cosmetics act 966 and in the instant cases in relation to prevention of food adulteration act and having found pitiable condition in relation to the misconceptions, knowledge and .....

Bhai Manjit Singh, Managing Director, Montari Industries Ltd. and anr. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1992)101PLR535

..... however, contended that company was fully aware of the facts that its product was misbranded but it did not approach the trial court for the benefit of section 24(4) of insecticides act, 1968 for the purpose of analysis of the sample.6. i have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the relevant record.7. ..... active ingredient contents. on the basis of this report a complaint was lodged against the petitioners and others under sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 and 33 of the insecticides act, 1968 (act for short) read with rule 27 (b) of the insecticides rules, 1971.3. before filing of the complaint a show-cause notice was served on m/s montari ..... had already expired. the petitioners were, thus, deprived of their important and valuable right to get the sample re-analysed by the central insecticides laboratory under sub-section 4 of section 24 of the act. in the written reply it was admitted that the power to send the sample for re-analysis is vested with the court alone and .....

K.V.Biju Vs. Union of India

Court : Kerala

..... registration committee (hereinafter referred to as "the committee"), the third respondent for registration of indigenous manufacture of insecticides under section 9 of the insecticides act, 1968 wa.767 and76915 2 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). the application came up for consideration in the 303rd meeting of the committee dated 5.8.2009 ..... the insecticides act, 1968 has been enacted to regulate the import manufacture, sale, transport, distribution and use of insecticides with a view to prevent risk to human beings or animals, and for matters connected therewith. the word 'insecticide' is defined under section 3(e) of the act, which is to the following effect: "3(e) 'insecticide' means ..... a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against the proposed order." 14. the rules have been framed, namely, the insecticides rules, 1971 in exercise of power under section 36 of the act. rule 6 provides for manner of registration.15. as noted above, the main thrust of the submissions of learned .....

M/S.Saidharani Shakambari Pvt. Lt Vs. The Commissioner and Director of ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... insecticides act, 1968 was enacted for regulating the import, manufacture, sale, transport, distribution and use of insecticides with a view of prevent risk to human beings or animals and matters connected therewith. it was amended from time to time and lastly in the year 2000. section 3 (e) of the act defines insecticide and it reads thus: (e) insecticide ..... along with a copy of the report to the persons dealing with the product and take necessary action against such persons either under the provisions of insecticides act, 1968 or fertilizer (control) order, 1985. after receipt of the explanation from the person, the authority can pass appropriate orders under the provisions of ..... in the location of the dealer and take sample thereof in order to verify whether any such product contains harmful substances attracting the provisions of insecticides act, 1968 or used as a fertilizer violating the provisions of fertilizer (control) order, 1985. the sample of the product shall be collected from the .....

The Joint Director of Agriculture Rep. by the P.P., High Court Vs. Sai ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1753

..... 223 of 1996 acquitting the accused is set aside. the accused are convicted for the offence covered by the charge viz., under section 29(1)(a) read with 3(k)(i) & (viii) of the insecticides act, 1958.20. the matter is remitted back to the trial court along with entire record and the judgment of this court directing to ..... of the vi additional munsif magistrate, guntur.2. the joint director of agriculture filed a case against the accused for the offence under section 29(1)(a) read with 3(k)(i) & (viii) of the insecticides act, 1958. according to the prosecution a-1 is the dealer, a-2 is the distributor, a-3 is the managing partner, ..... mediators, therefore, an adverse inference has to be drawn under section 114(g) of the indian evidence act for non-examination of the mediators.10. under section 21(1)(e) of the act, the insecticide officer has power to take samples of any insecticide and send such samples for analysis to the insecticide analyst for test in the prescribed manner. under this clause .....

Om Prakash Beej and Etc. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : 1997CriLJ698

..... 1991 and expiry date was september, 1993, in accordance with the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968 (herein after referred to as the act) and the rules framed thereunder. on being analysed the sample was declared misbranded by the senior analyst quality control insecticides laboratory, karnal vide his report dated 13-7-92 (annexure p. 15) deputy director ..... judicial magistrate, hisar took cognizance and summoned the petitioners vide order (annexure p. 2) for 15-9-93.3. the petitioners have filed the present petition under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure to quash the complaint (annexure p. 1), the summoning order (annexure p. 2) and the subsequent proceedings thereon. ..... its own motion or in its discretion at the request either of the complainant or of the accused, cause the sample of the insecticide produced before the magistrate under sub-section (6) of section 22 to be sent for test or analysis to the said laboratory, which shall make the test or analysis and report in .....

Bharat Palverising Mills Ltd. Vs. Collr. of Cus.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1997)(93)ELT628Tri(Mum.)bai

..... is otherwise not challenged.8. there does not appear any general instructions or any notification issued by the registration committee established under section 5 of the insecticides act, 1968 to the effect that registration certificates issued by them but which do not bear the endorsement of source of acquisition shall not be ..... dr. n.r. kantawala, the ld. advocate for the appellants has submitted that the appellants have been holding certificate for registration contemplated under section 9 of the insecticides act, 1968, since 1973, and have also been causing import of the subject item ever since then, and have been getting them cleared under ogl ..... clearance thereof under ogl. they initially filed into bond bill of entry. the item imported was covered under insecticides act, 1968. the appellants were holding registration certificate issued under section 9 of the said act. the said certificates however did not specify the approved source of import. instructions were issued vide letter dated .....

Present: Mr. Sandeep Vermani Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... - no.22217 of 2011) and criminal complaint no.280-2 dated 13.08.2008 (in criminal misc.-m no.23692 of 2011) filed under sections 3 (k) (i).17, 18 and 33 punishable under section 29 of insecticides act, 1968. as per the petitioner, he cannot be held vicariously liable because he had already resigned as director of the company by the time the incident ..... recording preliminary evidence of the complainant has summoned the petitioner to face trial. reference is made to the provisions of the insecticides act, 1968, whereby company has to appoint incharge and responsible person for the conduct of business under section 33 of the insecticides act. one sh. ramesh kulkarni son of sh. shrikrishna, factory manager was appointed as incharge and responsible person. this is on the .....

M/S. Dpb Antibiotics Vs. Cc, Chennai

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... committee (cibandrc). the original authority had confiscated the consignment under import under section 111 (d) of the act as the importer did not possess a valid license required for import of goods falling under csh 2905.5900 and as the importer had not registered with the cibandrc as required under insecticides act, 1968. the impugned order has upheld the order of the original authority. 2 ..... . we find that there is no dispute that the goods under import are being used as a preservative by the importer who is engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. we find that as per section 38 of the insecticide act, provisions requiring registration with the .....