Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 28 notification of cancellation of registration etc Page 26 of about 256 results (0.059 seconds)

Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner (Aa) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2009(236)ELT425(SC); JT2009(7)SC1; 2009(4)SCALE666; 2009(3)LC1550(SC); (2009)25VST271(SC); 2009AIRSCW6376:2009(4)Scale666.

..... the writ petition;iii) to declare that the sales turnover of products falling within the description insecticides and pesticides which are manufactured under licence under the insecticides act and falling within the description of entry 44(5) of iii schedule of kvat act is liable to be taxed only at 4% and levy of tax at 12.5% is ..... a specified period, at the rate of four per cent at all points of such transfer.5. the revenue, however, contends that section 6(1)(d) shall apply. clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 6 reads thus:(d) in the case of goods not falling under clauses (a) or (c) at the rate of 12. ..... , electric or 8516.79.20electronic mosquito repellents,gadgets and insect repellents,devices and parts and accessoriesthereof._______________________________________________________4. according to the appellant, in this case section 6(1)(a) of the act would be applicable, the relevant portion whereof reads as under:6. levy of tax on sale or purchase of goods.-(1) every dealer whose .....

Mr. Arvind Navinchandra Mafatlal, Chairman Emeritus of Nocil Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2010(112)BomLR1880

..... gupta on behalf of nocil. according to the complainant the nocil has replied to the secretary, central insecticides board, new delhi on 6th august 1984 that they had not secured a certificate of registration under the insecticides act either for import or manufacture of indigenous manufacture of glyphosate. it has been admitted that the distribution of ..... legal adviser and the secretary of the company and therefore was not covered by a definition of 'officer in default' as provided in section 5 of the companies act, set aside the order of issuance of process against the said accused. the learned revisional court however upheld the order of issuing process so ..... third party and marketing the same with a deceptive name 'weedall' without the consent of the complainants and therefore committed the offences punishable under the aforesaid sections.3. on the complaint being presented, the learned magistrate vide order dated 20th june 2006 found that the offences were not disclosed in the complaint .....

Commissioner of Income Tax 4 Vs. Techno Shares and Stocks Limited and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3801; (2009)225CTR(Bom)337; [2009]184TAXMAN103(Bom)

..... minerals, licence is necessary under the off-shore areas mineral (development & regulation) act, 2002. to manufacture, sale, purchase, possession, consumption or use of intoxicant for ..... is mandatory under section 22 of the banking regulation act, 1949. under the cantonments act, 2006, licence is mandatory for establishment of a private market or slaughter house in the cantonment area. to carry on food business licence under section 31 of the food safety & standards act, 2006 is mandatory. to manufacture, sale and distribution of insecticides, licence is mandatory under section 13 of the insecticides act, 1968. to explore .....

The State of Punjab Through Secretary Agriculture, Punjab Govt. and an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1990)97PLR696

..... ' taken from the plaintiff-messers : dharni new zimindari khad store for analysis to the central insecticides laboratory, faridabad.2. having been granted a licence for the purpose under the insecticides act 1968 (herein referred to as 'the act'), the plaintiffs are dealing in the storage and sale of insecticides and pesticides. it appears, that on a sample of 'butochlor' 50 per cent e.c. being marketed ..... which can be imposed in respect of the manufacture, sale and storage of insecticides. section 22 empowers insecticides inspectors to take samples of insecticides and send them for analysis to the insecticide analyst according to sub section (6) of section 22 of the act the insecticide inspector, besides sending one part of the sample to the insecticides analyst, is also required to produce the second part of it before the .....

Yogesh Dutt Vs. The State of Tamilnadu through Thiru S. Krishnamoorthy ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... on 21.08.2007, the complainant inspected the shop of the 4th accused, who is a retailer and took samples of an insecticide in terms of section 22 of the insecticides act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as the act, 1968) and sent one sample to the pesticide testing laboratory, madurai for analysis. the test report dated 17.09.2007 declared the ..... on 08.01.2008 and by reply dated 24.01.2008, repudiated the test report and prayed for re-analysis in terms of section 24 (3) of the act, 1968 by central insecticides laboratory, faridabad. under such circumstances, the prosecution should have been launched by the complainant before 01.11.2008 that is before the ..... 2008, he expressed his intention in no uncertain terms to adduce evidence to contradict the test report in terms of section 24(3) of the act, 1968, by getting the referee sample reanalysed by the central insecticides laboratory, faridabad. iii) admittedly, the complainant obtained sanction on 19.09.2008 and filed the complaint on 02.01 .....

Sanjay Bhandari Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1460; 2009(1)WLN116

..... cognizance against the petitioner. hence this misc. petition.4. in criminal misc. petition no. 41/2008, a complaint under section 29(1) of the insecticides act, 1968 was filed by the assistant director of agriculture (extension) & insecticides inspector, hanumangarh junction, on 17.3.2006 alleging therein that the insecticide product imidachloprid 17.8% sl batch no. 2003-j-01 was misbranded. the sample of the aforesaid ..... insecticide was drawn and sent to the laboratory, which was found to be misbranded. the learned judicial magistrate, pilibanga, distt. hanumangarh .....

industrial Minerals and ors. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2004)(112)LC152Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and a warning about its toxicity, and directions for administration of antidotes. copper sulphate figures as an insecticide in the schedule to the insecticide act, 1968. the appellant is registered with the insecticide board as a manufacturer of insecticide and it is stated that he is permitted to sell the goods only to dealers who are registered ..... 10 covers goods which are generically pesticides specifying the various categories such as insecticide rondenticide, fungicides etc. "put up in forms or packing for retail sale or as preparations or articles (for example, sulphur-treated bands, wicks and candles ..... asst. commissioner that the product is classifiable in heading 2833.00 of the tariff as an inorganic chemical not as claimed by the appellant as an insecticide in heading 3808.10.2. we have heard mr. a.k. saraf, the partner of the appellant and the departmental representative.3. heading 3808. .....

industrial Minerals and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

..... and a warning about its toxicity, and directions for administration of antidotes. copper sulphate figures as an insecticide in the schedule to the insecticide act, 1968. the appellant is registered with the insecticide board as a manufacturer of insecticide and it is stated that he is permitted to sell the goods only to dealers who are registered ..... 10 covers goods which are genetically pesticides specifying the various categories such as, insecticide, rondenticide, fungicides etc. "put up in forms or packing for retail sale or as preparations or articles (for example, sulphur-treated bands, wicks and candles ..... asst. commissioner that the product is classifiable in heading 2833.00 of the tariff as an inorganic chemical not as claimed by the appellant as an insecticide in heading 3808.10.2. we have heard mr. a.k. saraf, the partner of the appellant and the departmental representative.3. heading 3808. .....

Shri Satya Sai Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(120)ELT139TriDel

..... to the appellants, the products which are air-purifiers conform to the definition of of insecticides, which under section 3(e) of the insecticides act 1988 means : "(a) any substance specified in the schedule or (b) such other substance (including fungicides and insecticides) as the central government, may, after consultation with the board, by notification in the ..... more of such substance." they submit that both products are preparations of para-di-chloro-benzene (pdcb) which is specified in the schedule to the insecticides act, that the use of the product as clearly mentioned on the label is to guard against moths, cockroaches and insects, and the product is used ..... classification.4. the product is primarily used as air purifier, although it may incidentally act as a moth repellent. the product is for continuous use, unlike insecticides which are used for a limited period and constant use of insecticides may be deleterious to health. there are also no indications for use of the product .....

Present:- Mr. Balram Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab Through Inspec ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , punjab. **** daya chaudhary, j. the prayer in the present petition is for quashing of complaint no.55 dated 28.2.2006 registered under sections 3k (1).17,18,29,33 of insecticides act, 1968 and rules 1961 as well as summoning order dated 28.2.2006. briefly, the facts of the case are that a complaint was filed on 16 ..... .12.2003 by insecticide inspector against the petitioner by stating that respondent along with major singh brar, chief agricultural officer, muktsar visited the shop ..... months. the complaint as well as summoning order are liable to the quashed as self life of insecticides has already expired in october, 2005 and the complaint was filed after a long delay. as per provisions of section 24 (3) (4) of insecticides act, the petitioners are entitled to get the sample re- analyzed after launching the prosecution. in .....