Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 7 of about 365 results (0.074 seconds)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Karam Chand Appliance

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(117)ELT739TriDel

..... remains the same excepting that more concentrated form may be killing other insects whereas the present diluted product may kill specified insects namely mosquitoes. the product, therefore, remains insecticide in character, in use and in name. we also agree with the submission of the learned advocate that the board's circular can be of no help and stands ..... , shri devnath for the respondents submits that the product remains the same; it is merely diluted in concentration. mosquito is also an insect. therefore, the product remains as an insecticide. he relies for his submission on tribunal's judgment in the case of c.c.e. v. markfed agro chemicals reported in 1993 (68) e.l.t. 848 ( ..... .3.1 he further points out that one of the grounds taken by the revenue in its appeal is that the board has issued a circular under section 37b of the central excise act, 1944 but he submits this circular of the board has been quashed by three different high courts as per the following citations :- (2) para 5 .....

M/S Anu Products Ltd. Vs. M/S Raj Agro Tech and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... the date that the cheque is presented, the ascertained and crystallised debt or other liability relatable to the dishonoured cheque exists, the dishonor of the cheque would invite action under section 138 ni act. there could be situations where, for example, an issue may be raised with regard to the quality, quantity, deficiency, specifications, etc. of the goods/services supplied, or accounting. it ..... of the negotiable instruments act, 1881 (ni act) as alleged by the complainant in its complaint is not made out against the respondent/accused and, therefore, the accused has been acquitted.4. the appellant/complainant company is engaged in the business of manufacture of insecticides and pesticides. the respondent/accused shashi sharma is the proprietor of raj agro tech, who became a distributor of .....

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Drilling and Industries

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)85

..... as per system of accounting regularly followed by the assessee. the aforesaid deduction could be allowed while computing book profit under section 115j of it act in assessment year under consideration in the light of decision of cit v. geo industries & insecticides (i) (p) ltd. (supra) quoted above. we, therefore, do not find any legal infirmity in the ..... the ao. the said book profit was required to be reduced by the amount of loss or depreciation in accordance with provisions of sub-section (1) of section 205 of the companies act, 1956. he held that assessee had wrongly claimed depreciation on straight-line method. the depreciation as provided in books of account at rs. ..... claim was to be allowed in asst. yr. 1989-90. accordingly assessee had requested the ao to allow the claim while computing book profit under section 115j of the it act. while revenue authorities had refused to entertain the claim, the assessee moved the tribunal and directions dt.27th dec, 2000 noted above were issued. the .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Jindal Drilling and Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (2008)215CTR(Del)275; [2008]301ITR304(Delhi)

..... him to re-compute the correct income in accordance with law.15. that apart, we find that the tribunal has referred to commissioner of income tax v. geo industries and insecticides (i) pvt. ltd. : [1998]234itr541(mad) . in this decision, it has been held by the madras high court, on a pragmatic understanding of the law, that ..... a) considered the issue of allowing the deduction to the assessed for the assessment year 1989-90 and concluded that the order passed by the commissioner under section 263 of the act did not disentitle the assessed from agitating any fresh issue that arose as a result of certain developments that had taken place in the meanwhile. it was ..... the revenue preferred an appeal before the tribunal and that appeal was dismissed. it is under these circumstances that the revenue is before us in appeal under section 260a of the act.14. we find that apart from anything else, the assessed is placed in a rather piquant situation. it is not entitled to a deduction for the expenditure .....

Shri Kartar Singh and ors. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2006CriLJ4099; 131(2006)DLT643; II(2006)DMC382; 2006(90)DRJ734

..... , and in order to the doing of that thing; orthirdly. intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.8. in hira lal jain (supra), a learned single judge of this court, after examining the provisions of section 107, indicated that a reading thereof would make it clear that the person who instigates another ..... to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing.xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9. in mahendra singh v. state of m.p. : 1996crilj894 , the appellant was charged for an offence under section 306 i.p.c. basically based upon the dying declaration of the deceased, ..... which defines 'abetment'. he submitted that the ingredients of section 107 are not made out in the present case as there is no instigation or goading. secondly, there is no allegation of any conspiracy and, thirdly, there is no intentional aiding in the doing of an illegal act. he also submitted that there is no suicide note in .....

M/S Crystal Crop. Protection Private Limited vs.union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... petition, seeks a direction to the respondents to consider and decide the pending application for wp(c) 4154/2017 page 1 of 2 registration made by the petitioner under section 9 of the insecticides act, 1968.2. issue notice. notice is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for respondent no.1.3. learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that there are certain .....

Ms Shikha Gupta vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

..... a thing.********* crl. rev. p. 330/2017 page 6 of 16 abetment , thus, means certain amount of active suggestion or support to do the act.35. analysing the concept of abetment , as found in section 107 ipc, a two-judge bench in chitresh kumar chopra v. state (govt. of nct of delhi) [chitresh kumar chopra v. state (govt. of ..... omission takes place in pursuance of that conspiracy, and in order to the doing of that thing; or thirdly, intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing. explanation to section wilful misrepresentation or wilful concealment of material fact which he is bound to disclose, may also come within the contours of abetment . it is ..... 2. whoever, either prior to or at the time of the commission of an act, does anything in order to facilitate the commission of that act, and thereby facilitate the commission thereof, is said to aid the doing of that act. 13. in terms of section 107 ipc, a person abets the doing of a thing, who instigates any person to .....

Jagat Singh Vs. the Asst. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ1CAT

..... be read to signify something deeper than a mere asking of a person to do a particular act. there must be something in the nature of solicitation to constitute instigation or incitement under section 27 of the industrial dispute act. the words seem to convey the meaning 'to goad or urge forward or to provoke or ..... encourage the doing of an act'. it is, sometimes, difficult to bring out the exact meaning of words ..... moosa raza. the high court has noted the definition of misconduct in stroud's judicial dictionary which runs as under: misconduct means, misconduct arising from ill motive; acts of negligence, errors of judgment, or innocent mistake, do not constitute such misconduct. in industrial jurisprudence amongst others, habitual or gross negligence constitute misconduct but in .....

Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. E.i. Dupont India Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)298ITR296(Delhi)

..... the case of cit v. h.j. forgings (p) ltd. 251 itr 15 (bom). the learned cit(appeals) held that the assessee was engaged in the business of insecticides and the products had a limited shelf life. the provision of rs. 41,73,107/- comprised of obsolete/useless stock. besides, certain shortages were reported on account of leakage ..... on this basis the learned cit(appeals) directed that the entire expenditure should be treated as revenue expenditure and allowed to the assessee as a deduction under section 37(1) of the act. he directed the learned assessing officer to withdraw depreciation as allowed. still aggrieved, revenue is in appeal before us.5. during the course of hearing before ..... rs. 41,73,107/-being provision for damage in stock made by the assessing officer while computing book profit for the purpose of levy of tax under section 115ja of the act. the learned assessing officer held that these two amounts were required to be added to the net profit of the assessee as per p & l account, .....

Punj Lloyd Ltd Vs. Gvk Power (Goindwal Sahib) Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... mr. abhimanyu bhandari, advocates. coram: justice s. muralidhar judgement % 21.04.2015 1. punj lloyd ltd ( pll ) has filed these petitions under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( act ) seeking interim reliefs against the respondent gvk power (goindwal sahib) ltd. ( gvk ). background facts 2. gvk was awarded a contract by the state ..... india ilr (1978) i delhi 308 (fb), kamal pushp enterprises v. chairmancum-md gail1994(31)drj651 garlapati ramanaiah naidu v. l&t finance (2012) 5 ctc172and gujarat insecticides ltd. v. jainsons minerals (2009) 153 plr1 k.s. wahi v. ganga exports 2001(58) drj150 south east asia shipping co. ltd. v. nav bharat (1996 ..... deal with the subject matter, an inference may be drawn that the parties intended to exclude all other courts. (v) under section 42 of the act, if an application under section 9 is made to a court having jurisdiction, then all subsequent applications both arising out of the arbitration agreement and the arbitral proceedings .....