Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 10 of about 365 results (0.553 seconds)

Yogesh Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT16

..... of police is more elaborate and as rightly submitted by learned counsel for the appellant, the reasons are clearly discernible. even otherwise, the effect of section 19(3) of the act relating to prejudice has been completely lost sight of by the high court. the second reason indicated by the high court to quash the proceedings ..... i) neither inspector o.d.yadav nor acp niranjan singh (at that time inspector) was authorized to investigate this matter in view of the bar contained under section 17 of the act, which reads as under:17 - persons authorised to investigate: notwithstanding anything contained in the code of criminal procedure, 1973 ( 2 of 1974), no police officer ..... was clinching evidence of panch witness pw5 and raid officer pw6 and, thus, convicted her. 11. the special judge also held appellant yogesh kumar guilty under section 12 of the act, by making following observations: 22. as regards accused yogesh kumar is concerned, i find that he was hand in glove with his co-accused in .....

Anil Jindal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT398

..... suspicion.' 15. in the present case also grounds of detention do not indicate that the petitioner actually exported goods which were liable to be confiscated under section 113 of the customs act, 1962 or attempting to export improperly the banned or the goods which were liable to be confiscated. thereforee, there is a clear variance in the order ..... cover the case of the petitioner in the definition of 'smuggling' the authority had to prove that in relation to the goods liable to the confiscated under section 113 of the customs act, 1962, the petitioner was involved in the actual exporting of the goods. from the reading of the grounds of detention dated 7th november, 2001 we ..... the involvement of m/s vikas trading corporation and m/s rahul traders. petitioner who is the proprietor of m/s rahul traders, his statement under section 108 of the customs act, 1962 was also recorded. he admitted having issued for bills of ramming mass amounting to rs. 1,51,20,000/- to m/s vikas trading corporation .....

Rajiv Narula Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT688

..... that immediately before her death she was subjected by such person to cruelty and/or harassment for, or in connection with, any demand for dowry, section 113b, evidence act provides that the court shall presume that such person had caused the dowry death. of course if there is proof of the person having intentionally caused ..... highly sensitive suspicious credulous psychopathic girl who had no exposure to the realities of life.9. it is also submitted that even otherwise presumption under section 113a of the evidence act cannot substitute the proof. it is stated that frustration in the mind of the deceased who was a doctor by profession that her husband ..... committing suicide taking into consideration all the facts and surrounding circumstance of the case and as such, no presumption should have been drawn against them under section 113a of the evidence act. in this regard, shri k.k. sud, the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants, has referred to a number of judgments including .....

D.T.C. Vs. Jag Bhushan Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 132(2006)DLT384; [2007(112)FLR57]; (2007)2LLJ322Del

..... that is not the scope of the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution. the foundation of the jurisdiction under section 33a of the i.d. act is the contravention of section 33. if the contravention of section 33 is established, the next question would be whether the dismissal of the employee passed by the management is justified on ..... charges of misconduct. 8. the earlier judgment of this court in ramesh chander (supra), contemplated that further proceedings would take place before the tribunal under section 33-a of the i.d. act. even while this court upheld the virus of clause (ii) of the regulation 15(2)(c) of the regulations (on a reading down of ..... regulations as well as the notification issued under the esma. however it permitted the workmen to pursue their remedies under section 33a, i.d. act for the contravention of the provisions of section 33 of the same act. the court further directed the appellate authority of the dtc to either hold an enquiry itself or to direct such an .....

Shekhar Goel Vs. Enforcement Directorate

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

..... i.e., the person other than the nre account holder has not been controverted. 21. the appellant-bank has been granted licence to act as authorized dealer under the provisions of section 6 fer act, 1973. the licence or authorization is not brought out before this tribunal by either of the parties. therefore, we assume that the legal ..... 117. 28. hence, it can be safely said that adjudicating authority can hold proceedings for contravention of provisions of this act under sections 50 and 51 and the arguments advanced by ld. counsel contain no substance. section 73a is an additional power granted to rbi for imposition of penalty which does not affect in any manner the powers of ..... , enforcement directorate imposing total penalty of rs. 15 lakhs (rs. 5 lakhs each) on shekhar goel (the individual appellant) for contravention of sections 8(1) 9(1)(a), 8(1) read with section 64(2) of fer act, 1973 respectively and total penalty of rs. 10 lakhs (rs. 5 lakhs + rs. 5 lakhs) on m/s. american express bank .....

Rekha Nambiar and Another Vs. C B I

Court : Delhi

..... on the basis of a source information, against accused no.1/ramesh nambiar, husband of petitioner rekha nambiar and naveen patil under sections 13 (2) read with section 13(1)(e) pc act and section 109 ipc on the allegations that accused ramesh nambiar while posted and functioning as agm (sport), air india at new delhi and ..... m.c. no. 4781/2014) managing director of m/s. hyt group of companies, naveen patil and rekha nambiar under sections 13 (2) read with section 13(1)(e) of prevention of corruption act, 1988 ( pc act') and section 109 of the indian penal code, 1860 ( ipc') on the allegations that accused ramesh nambiar while posted and functioning as ..... intentionally aided accused ramesh nambiar in acquiring disproportionate assets. accordingly, the charge against ramesh nambiar was framed for the offences punishable under sections 13(1)(e) read with section 13(2) pc act. as far as petitioner bhojraj teli is concerned, the learned trial court recorded that his role in this case is that he .....

Anoop Singh vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... statement of mr. dinesh chand sharma. however, the decision rendered in pulukuri kottaya (supra), the locus classicus with regard to the interpretation of section 27, evidence act would render this challenge nugatory. in pulukuri kottaya (supra) and in navjot sandhu (supra), which also 129. discusses the ratio enunciated in the ..... its contents at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the code of civil procedure. section 80, evidence act: 80. presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence. whenever any document is produced before any court, purporting to be a record ..... iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. register of directors of green park theatre and associates pvt. ltd. register of members. register of contract under section 301, companies act, 1956. register of directors and shareholdings & shareholders. register of share transfers. share capital ledger. original letter with respect to sh. pranav ansal. original resignation .....

D. V. Malhotra vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... statement of mr. dinesh chand sharma. however, the decision rendered in pulukuri kottaya (supra), the locus classicus with regard to the interpretation of section 27, evidence act would render this challenge nugatory. in pulukuri kottaya (supra) and in navjot sandhu (supra), which also 129. discusses the ratio enunciated in the ..... its contents at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the code of civil procedure. section 80, evidence act: 80. presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence. whenever any document is produced before any court, purporting to be a record ..... iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. register of directors of green park theatre and associates pvt. ltd. register of members. register of contract under section 301, companies act, 1956. register of directors and shareholdings & shareholders. register of share transfers. share capital ledger. original letter with respect to sh. pranav ansal. original resignation .....

Gopal Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... statement of mr. dinesh chand sharma. however, the decision rendered in pulukuri kottaya (supra), the locus classicus with regard to the interpretation of section 27, evidence act would render this challenge nugatory. in pulukuri kottaya (supra) and in navjot sandhu (supra), which also 129. discusses the ratio enunciated in the ..... its contents at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the code of civil procedure. section 80, evidence act: 80. presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence. whenever any document is produced before any court, purporting to be a record ..... iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. register of directors of green park theatre and associates pvt. ltd. register of members. register of contract under section 301, companies act, 1956. register of directors and shareholdings & shareholders. register of share transfers. share capital ledger. original letter with respect to sh. pranav ansal. original resignation .....

Sushil Ansal vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... statement of mr. dinesh chand sharma. however, the decision rendered in pulukuri kottaya (supra), the locus classicus with regard to the interpretation of section 27, evidence act would render this challenge nugatory. in pulukuri kottaya (supra) and in navjot sandhu (supra), which also 129. discusses the ratio enunciated in the ..... its contents at a subsequent stage of the proceedings, otherwise than in accordance with the conditions prescribed by the code of civil procedure. section 80, evidence act: 80. presumption as to documents produced as record of evidence. whenever any document is produced before any court, purporting to be a record ..... iv. v. vi. vii. viii. ix. register of directors of green park theatre and associates pvt. ltd. register of members. register of contract under section 301, companies act, 1956. register of directors and shareholdings & shareholders. register of share transfers. share capital ledger. original letter with respect to sh. pranav ansal. original resignation .....