Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 5 of about 365 results (0.135 seconds)

Voltas Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1995)(80)ELT124TriDel

..... the department has alleged that the following intermediate products are produced by them namely :- 3. the department's contention is that the insecticides/pesticides fall under chapter sub-heading no. 3808.10 of central excise tariff act, 1985 and attract nil rate of duty. however, the intermediate products are classifiable under chapter sub-heading no. 2942.00 and ..... to evade duty and also they were under the bona fide belief that the intermediates were riot excisable, hence it was their plea that the extended period under section 11a cannot be invoked.6. before the learned collector during the personal hearing, the appellants had relied on several judgments in their support and also a letter ..... central excise rules, 1944.2. the appellants were issued with a show cause notice dated 27-8-1992, which invoked the proviso to section 11a(1) of the central excises and salt act, 1944 by raising a demand of rs. 2,89,02,653 on the following intermediate products, which are said to have been produced .....

Marico Ltd and Ors Vs. State of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

..... a subsequent decision rendered in northern mineral limited v. union of india air2010sc2829 the supreme court, while dealing with section 24(3) of the insecticides act, 1968, which is in pari materia with s.25(3) of the drugs and cosmetics act, proceeded to discharge the appellant on the premise that no step could be taken for analysis of the sample ..... by central insecticides laboratory due to sheer inaction on the part of the authorities concerned resulting in expiry of ..... fact that the accused had notified its intention to adduce evidence in controversion of the report of insecticide analyst.11. adverting to the facts of the case, it may be observed that the notice under section 13(2) of the act along with the copy of the report of the public analyst was forwarded to the petitioner .....

Subhash Chand Vs. the State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Reported in : II(1996)DMC108

..... stated that she bolted the door from outside keeping the husband and children confined inside the room and outside the room, she in a fit of anger consumed ah insecticide and set fire to herself by pouring kerosene oil on her and lighting the match. the grievance of the wife appears to be that the husband was not earning ..... protect her against his family members. counsel for the state has not pointed out any other plea, which would help him support the impugned order to sustain charge under sections 498a or 306 ipc. the result of the above discussion is that the impugned order relating to the petitioner cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. the charge ..... abetment to commit suicide. it appears that it was a case of trivial domestic quarrels. the main quarrel between the husband and wife is that the husband was not always acting on the lines which wife wanted him to follow. according to the dying declaration, after the deceased had a quarrel with one suman, i.e., the sister-in-law, .....

Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2000)(120)ELT472TriDel

..... context of project imports regulations as that explanation relates only to that section, as is evident from the phrase "for the purpose of this sections" occurring at the commencement of that explanation". similarly tribunal had in the case of bombay chemicals, supra, that insecticides act, 1968 or the schedule thereto would not govern the meaning of the ..... the product does not fit into the definition of 'autorickshaw' given in so 436 (e) issued for the specific purpose of sub-section (4) of section 41 of the motor vehicles act. having regard to the common/commercial parlance understanding the impugned product is an autorickshaw eligible for the exemption under notification no. 162/86- ..... of the learned counsel that the definition given in the so 436(e), issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 4 of the m.v. act, cannot be intended to serve as an exhaustive description of autorickshaw connoting the understanding of the vehicle in commercial or common parlance .....

M/S Midas Hygenic Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shri Sudhir Bhatia and Othe ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT667

..... present suit. 3. consequently by this application, temporary injunction is claimed against the defendants and the subordinates etc. from manufacturing, marketing, disputing or selling insecticide, pesticides as well as repellant chalks under the trademark laxmanrekha as well as user of packing material having similar get-up, layout, design, colour ..... -interim injunction. consequently the defendants, their servants, agents, distributors, stockists or any other person acting on their behalf shall be injuncted with effect from 16.8.2001 from manufacturing, marketing, distributing or selling insecticides, pesticides as well as insect repellent chalks under the trade mark laxman rekha as well as ..... the plaintiff a fir was filed in bombay and the defendants' employees were arrested and the duplicate materials seized and a consequent complaint filed under sections 420, 465 and 489 ipc is still pending; (xv) that a resolution of the dispute was attempted by the relatives of the parties by .....

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Sunder Lal and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1976CriLJ1908; 12(1976)DLT93

..... defenco version that the sample of hing was sold not for human consumption but for use as insecticide in agriculture.(23) in the result we set aside the acquittal of the respondent and convict him under section 7 read with section 16 of the act of 1954.(24) the next question is one of sentence. the learned counsel for the respondent ..... to the public to the person from whom it is taken. he is also enabled to take a sample to be sent to the public analyst appointed under the act. section 11 lays down the procedure to be followed by the food inspector while taking sample of food for analysis. he has to give notice in writing then and there ..... 9) he would incur penal consequences if he acts vexatiously and without reasonable grounds. even in the statement which the respondent made when examined under section 342 criminal procedure code . he did not say that he had sold the sample of hing as one not fit for human consumption but only for use as insecticide in agriculture. if this was so he would .....

i.S. Goel and anr. Vs. the Commissioner - Transport and anr.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : III(2004)ACC6; 113(2004)DLT407; 2004(76)DRJ343

..... i) tilling, sowing, harvesting, crushing of any agricultural produce or any other similar operation carried out for the purpose of agriculture; (ii) transport of manure, seeds, insecticides and other like articles required for work in the land from the market to the land; and (iii) transport of any agricultural produce from the land to the place ..... is no doubt that though such registration certificates were deemed to have been cancelled, the certificates were capable of being misused since under sub-section (5) of section 56 of the mv act, the certificate of fitness is effective and valid throughout india. in terms of the supreme court directions, the bus could not ply in ..... of these vehicles for use outside delhi, these vehicles had to be registered outside delhi after obtaining a no objection certificate as was required under section 48 of the mv act. section 48 is as under: ''48. no objection certificate.--(1) the owner of a motor vehicle when applying for the assignment of a new .....

e.i. Du Pont De Nemours and Company & Anr vs.jeetender Kumar Kaushik & ...

Court : Delhi

..... details of such registrations are tabulated herein below:7. trade mark number date class goods coragen148746 14/09/2006 dupont41901 12/03/1984 5 5 insecticides insecticides, fungicides and herbicides. the plaint further states that the above-mentioned registrations have been renewed from time to time and are valid and subsisting as ..... copyrights and/or any other packaging/label/ marks deceptively or confusingly similar to the plaintiffs trade marks and copyrights or which contain the plaintiffs insecticide chlorantraniliprole iv) to disclose on oath the exact constitution and details of all such distributors/manufacturers/retailers involved in the manufacturing/distribution/marketing of ..... of the coragen packaging cs(comm) 98/2016 page 5 of 8 as reproduced herein below, as per the provisions of the copyright act 1957, particularly section 2(e):-"9. learned counsel for the plaintiffs states that, upon receiving information of the large scale counterfeiting of coragen products being sold .....

Nath Peters Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1995)LC522Tri(Delhi)

..... other" 8. a reading of the tariff schedule after 1-3-1987 makes it clear that after 1-3-1987 'disinfectant' is added to the tariff item and insecticides etc. are classified under tariff item 3808.10. the remaining, namely, anti-sprouting products, plant growth regulators, disinfectants and similar products are classified under 3808.90 under ..... 3808.10 (formerly 3801.20) and not under 3808.90 (formerly 3801.90) as held by the collector. elaborating, he submitted that liquid phenyl is an "insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, weedicides and pesticides" and therefore it would fall under heading 3808.10. with the aid of the literature filed along with the captioned misc. application ..... hyderabad, 1989 (40) e.l.t. 276 (sc), wherein the apex court held that the extended period of limitation of five years under proviso to section 11a of the act is not applicable, since the information said to have been withheld in that case was not deliberate but was the result of interpretation. he also cited the .....

Sumitomo Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the brand name vectobac 12 as. the petitioner had obtained a registration certificate to import/sell to market the larvicide by the registration committee of central insecticide board (cib) which is a body constituted under the insecticides act, 1968 under the ministry of agriculture. be it noted, the initial certificate was granted in favour of m/s aventis crop science india ltd. and eventually ..... to the path of vitiation.14. mr. akhil sibal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has raised the following submissions:(a) that the notice inviting tender is compartmentalized into various sections and sections 1 and 2 which incorporate clause 7 under the heading documents establishing bidders eligibility and qualification especially clause 7.2(a), (b) and (c) does not precisely state the .....