Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 25 of about 365 results (0.079 seconds)

Jul 26 1971 (HC)

Kuldip Kumar Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1972CriLJ75

..... notified earlier to show cause why he should not be externed, an order of externment may be passed. on considering the material before it the authority acting under section 57 must give its reasons as to why it considers it likely that if not externed the person concerned will go on indulging in such activities ..... at all urged before me that any alteration whatsoever has been made in the said clause by the central government while applying the said act to delhi. section 2 of the union territories (laws) act has. thereforee, been properly utilised. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is unable to draw any sustenance from the aforementioned judgment ..... police act to the union territory of delhi. two of the convictions are admittedly such which the petitioner suffered after the issuance of the notification, mentioned above. the conviction in 15th of february. 1966. under section 307 of the indian penal code and that under section 332 of the said code on the 28th of february. 1968. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1993 (HC)

India Telecomp Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 50(1993)DLT117; 1993(25)DRJ605

..... case of bpl it was stated by the respondents that any foreign collaboration proposal required the sanction of the reserve bank of india (rbi) under section 28 of the foreign exchange regulation act, 1973 (fera). it may also require the departmental approval of one or more of the departments of the government. depending upon the circumstances,applications ..... that shri b.r. nair, member (services) will function as the director general (telecommunications), and will exercise all powers of telegraph authority conferred by section 3(vi)of the indian telegraph act, 1885, w.e.f. 29/05/1992. in the tender documents 'telecom authority' was defined. it was stated that telecom authority 'for the ..... to be prejudiced, that is sufficient to quash the decision (see per lord denning, m.r. in metropolitan properties co. (f.g.c.) ltd. v. lannon (1968) 3 wlr 694 . we should not however, be understood to deny that the court might with greater propriety apply the 'reasonable suspicion' test in criminal or in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1977 (HC)

Devendra Kumar Shukla Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi538

..... assistant director grade i of the i.s.s. grade iii.(53) it is again well known that fundamental rules having been framed under section 96-b of the government of india act, 1915, still have statutory force as they are kept alive under article 313 of the constitution of india and the directions and instructions, so ..... s.s. was this distinct categorisation between permanent and temporary vacancies, and the department of supply was requested to restore the seniority list as on 20-12-1968 and to notify the petitioner's confirmation. it was also requested that the petitioner may be informed if the departmental promotees whose seniority had been upgraded were ..... of the aforesaid service by a memorandum of appointment dated 7th december, 1967 which the petitioner ultimately accepted and reported for duty on the forenoon of january 15, 1968.(10) it was also averred that another officer, shri s. koteswar, was also offered a permanent vacancy and some other officers were also offered temporary vacancies. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1974 (HC)

Kesora M. Cement Vs. the Government of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 10(1974)DLT321

..... industrial purposes it is regarded as a major mineral. (4) on june 8, 1968, m/s. oriental tale products (pvt) ltd. (fourth respondent), submitted an application to the state government under section 10 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957, and rule 22 of the mineral concession rules, 1960, which was received ..... on june 12, 1968, for the grant of a mining lease for the minerals calcite and dolomite over an ..... be formally executed between the parties. as regards registration, the petitioner reiterated its stand that the lease deed needed no registration n view of section 90 of the registration act under which all leases by the government are exempt from registration, and pointed out that there was no recital in the lease deed that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 25 1976 (HC)

Avtar Singh Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi224

..... of the police station. nevertheless, the petitioner was suspended on 11/10/1965 and ordered to be prosecuted. -he was charged with havingcommitted an offence under section 342 of the indian penal code inthat he wrongfully confined sukhai.(54) by a judgment dated 13/11/1967, the sessions courtacquitted all the accused giving ..... by delhi administration. nothing morewas said in this letter. it appears that this letter was written by theinspector-general pursuant to a letter dated 6/06/1968 which liehad in turn received from the under secretary (home), delhi administration. a copy of this letter is at page 175 of the administration'saforesaid file ..... it establishes is that 'the question is one of discretion for (the) court to follow from case to case'.neither the periods prescribed by the limitation act nor any other time limits confine or restrict this discretion. but some well recognisedconsiderations do affect its exercise. before assisting the aggrievedparty the court must be satisfied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 1971 (HC)

R.K. Gupta Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi254

..... corruption against 'some officials of the department of industrial development. ministry of industrial development and company affairs and the directorate general technical development under section 5(l)(d) read with section 5(2) of the prevention of corruption act, 1947', on the report of mr, n. p. c. naidu, a member of parliament. (15) on august 20, 1969 ..... no. 3 wanted to favor. this misuse was reported by the petitioner to the industrial advicer who was his immediate superior and who, on december 24. 1968, brought the misuse to the notice of respondent no. 3 and the secretary of the ministry advising deterrent punishment to be meted out to the firms for misuse ..... petitioner incurred the extreme displeasure of respondent no. 3 as a result of which he was transferred from the switchgear industry to the cable industry in october, 1968 the petitioner alleges that when he came to the cable industry he found that there had been large, scale abuse of import licenses for raw materials by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 06 1970 (HC)

Kundan Lal Vij Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi493

..... with the rules has been established by the decisions of the supreme court in sant ram sharma v. state of rajasthan and others : (1968)iillj830sc . further section 4 of the police act, 1861, vests the administration of police throughout a general policedistrict in the inspector-general of police and in such deputy inspector general and assistant ..... inspectors general as to the statement government shall deem fit. section 12 of the said act empowers the inspector general of police to frame from time to time subject to the approval of the state government such orders and rules as ..... to take such decision and issue instructions permitting stenographers like the petitioners to appear for the said test by virtue of the provisions in sections 4 and 11 of the indian police act, and that it was no where stated in any of the aforesaid annexures that it was an experimental or ex-gratia measure or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 1973 (HC)

N.C. Singhal Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi1081

..... the representation of 30th june 1965 was not of an existing fact but was of a proposal of future action. it was not, thereforec. covered by section 115 of the evidence act. secondly, the option was asked only regarding the revised scales of pay and allowances by the letter of 14th july 1965. no option was asked about ..... were made. no explanationn is given by the petitioners why they delayed so much in challenging these ..appointmenis. these 25 appointments to superlime grade ii made in 1967. 1968 and 1969 and, thereforee, immune from challenge by the petitioners. (26) we now examine the challenge to the 29 promotions actually made by the government in 1971 ..... ) while only 31 appointments thereto were made by promotion inasmuch as 25 appointments to supertime grade ii were explained by the government as having been made in 1967, 1968 and 1969 under rule 7a(l) and (2) on the recommendation of the selectio committee which met in 1966. government shall, thereforee, have due regard to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1997 (HC)

Mrs. Kailash Suneja and ors. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : (1998)145CTR(Del)560

..... apex court in the case of barium chemicals ltd. vs. company law board : [1967]1scr898 . here, it is not a case of subjective satisfaction. sec. 269ud(1a) and (1b) of the it act, 1961 reads as under :'(1a) before making an order under sub-s. (1), the appropriate authority shall give a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the ..... annual rent by certain number of years of purchase in case the property is tenanted.69. the learned senior counsel also referred to ced vs. radha devi jalan : [1968]67itr761(cal) . referring to jaswant rai vs. cwt the learned senior counsel submitted that the benefit of the method which is most favourable to the assessed should be ..... and, thereforee, the purchase order is liable to be quashed. the learned counsel relied upon the passage of the judgment of the supreme court reported in air 1968 sc 1156 wherein the supreme court had held :'it is well settled that where the jurisdiction of an administrative authority depends upon a preliminary finding of fact the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 01 1970 (HC)

1. Mrs. Kailash Suneja (C.W. No. 5220 of 1993 and C.M. No. 1988 of 199 ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : [1998]231ITR318(Delhi); [1998]97TAXMAN144(Delhi)

..... (page 584) : 'the sine qua non is that reasons must exist, on the material placed before it, for supporting the action taken for pre-emptive purchase under section 269ud of the act. the order clearly falls short of this requirement'.in e. vittal v. appropriate authority : [1996]221itr760(ap) , a division bench of the andhra pradesh high court ..... is to capitalise the annual rent by certain years of purchase in case the property is tenanted.learned senior counsel also referred to ced v. radha devi jalan : [1968]67itr761(cal) . referring to jaswant rai v. cwt , learned senior counsel submitted that the benefit of the method which is most favourable to the assessed should be ..... liable to be quashed. learned counsel relied upon the passage of the judgment of the supreme court in state of madhya pradesh v. d. k. jadav, air 1968 sc 1186, wherein supreme court had held :'it is well settled that where the jurisdiction of an administrative authority depends upon a preliminary finding of fact the high .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //