Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 23 of about 365 results (0.052 seconds)

Bharti Nayyar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi23; 1977RLR312

..... detaining authority (para 16) as standing in the way of disclosing such information and material before him was not the kind of privilege he could raise under section 124 of the evidence act. obviously, even such a claim of privilege could not be put forward except by filing a detailed affidavit claiming ivilege. this not having been done shri ..... by the third respondent (shri p. ghosh, additional district magistrate, delhi) in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the maintenance of internal security act no. 26 of 1971 (hereafter referred to as the misa) read with the delhi administration notification no. f. 2/69/75-home (p. ii) ..... practices act of 1956 in registrar of trading v. w. m. smith, 1969 (3) all e.r. 1065 (13): 'onthis point, i cannot agree with the judge 1968 3 all e.r. 721 (14). before an order for examination is made, there must in fact be reasonable cause to believe that a restrictive agreement has been made. section 14(1 .....

Dr. B.K. Dawesar Vs. Sh. K.K. Sapra

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT147

..... that purpose of letting was residential. it is thereforee, to be seen whether the finding of the tribunal is perverse or in contravention of settled law. section 39 of the act permits second appeal only on substantial question of law. according to learned counsel for the appellant, decision on the point of purpose of letting will necessarily ..... skill to understand what it means. mere plain straight reading of a document does not involve a question of law much less a substantial question of law 1968 dlt 200. i do not see any perversity in the approach or the conclusion arrived at by the learned tribunal in this regard. it is settled law ..... was some evidence of continued user of the premises for residential-cum-clinical purposes. according to learned arc, all other ingredients of clause (e) of section 14(1) of the act are made out and thereforee, the denial of eviction order merely on account of constructional features, will clearly lead to miscarriage of justice, particularly when .....

Sh. B.L. Kantroo Vs. Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 154(2008)DLT56; 2009LC(DEL)762

..... authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this act, therefore the aforesaid section is to be read with section 153 of the electricity act, 2003. section 153 of electricity act, 2003 reads as under:153. constitution of special courts - (1) the state government may, for the purposes of ..... parties. we shall first deal with the issue as to whether the concerned matter falls within the jurisdiction of the assessing officer under section 126 of the act or not.12. section 145 of the electricity act, 2003 reads as under:145. civil court not to have jurisdiction - no civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or ..... civil court.24. the relevant principles regarding ouster of jurisdiction of civil court were laid down by the apex court in dhulabhai v. state of mp : [1968]3scr662 reads as under:(1) where the statute gives a finality to the orders of the special tribunals the civil courts jurisdiction must be held to be excluded .....

New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Prominent Hotels Limited

Court : Delhi

..... is in unauthorised occupation of the public premises as well as for recovery of arrears of rent, damages and interest payable by such person. 29.6. section 60 of the easements act, 1882 in not exhaustive and the parties can stipulate a licence to be revocable. the construction of a permanent structure in case of revocable licence would also ..... the defendants from effecting the recovery of rs. 1,40,000/- for which amount the plaintiff is sought to be made liable under the contract dated 4th june. 1968, on account of the risk purchase made by the defendants. the value for the purposes of relief, in the circumstances, shall be value of the liability from which ..... the said judgement is reproduced hereunder. 14. in har shankar [(1975) 1 scc 737, 745-46] appellants' bid was accepted in an auction held on march 23, 1968 for the right to sell country liquor at two vends in ludhiana. the appellants paid the security deposit but were unable to meet their obligation under the conditions of auction .....

M/S. Sesa Goa Limited and Another Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief ...

Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

..... be stopped. further the unauthorized portion needs to be surveyed and removed forthwith. 16. directions: therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred under section 5 of the environment (protection) act, 1986; the gczma directs:- i. m/s sesa goa to forthwith stop the activity over the illegal portion of the jetties in question and ..... dated 12/8/2010 confirming that the panchayat records indicate existence of jetties from 1969; d. notice/resolution from the communidade of navelim dated 12/9/1968; e. affidavits of 11 local and prominent villagers from amona; f. outward registers of the panchayat of amona in relation to the permission for repairs of ..... action under review. this court with approval stated: 11. the orderly functioning of the process of review requires that the grounds upon which the administrative agency acted be clearly disclosed and adequately sustained. 12. in exercise of the power of judicial review, the concept of reasoned orders/actions has been enforced equally by .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax V Vs. Nagesh Knitwears P. Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... a finding that the order is erroneous. finding that the order is erroneous is a condition or requirement which must be satisfied for exercise of jurisdiction under section 263 of the act. in such matters, to remand the matter/issue to the assessing officer would imply and mean the cit has not examined and decided whether or not the ..... . 12. it is not possible to agree with the learned counsel for the revenue that the aforesaid instructions is not a circular issued by the board under section 119 of the act. the office memorandum refers to the clarification sought by the aepc, whether the premium received on transfer of the export quotas could be treated as a part ..... stated therein are assumed to be correct. 13. in the said judgment, delhi high court had referred to earlier decisions of the supreme court in rampyari devi sarogiv. cit (1968) 67 itr 84 (sc) and tara devi aggarwal v. cit (1973) 88 itr 323 (sc), wherein it has been held that where assessing officer has accepted a particular .....

Panchayati Akhara Naya Udaseen Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

..... of the high court of calcutta in hakim fazal mohammad vs. state of west bengal manu/wb/0270/1968 holding that giving of the substance of the notification under section 4 of the land acquisition act being an official act, must be presumed to have been properly done unless the contrary is proved. finding the plaintiff in ..... , in response to the order dated 2nd november, 2015 aforesaid in this proceeding has deposed, (i) that the records reveal that a notification under section 3 of the 1948 act was issued sometime in late december, 1948 or early january, 1949 for the lands falling in village basai darapur; the said notification also included the ..... since whole of the area was in possession of the petitioner for religious worship, it could not have been the subject matter of notification of acquisition under section 3 of the act aforesaid; (x) that respondent dda from february, 2004 had started demolishing the land around the land in question and threatened to demolish the construction raised .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi Vs. Suman Dhamija

Court : Delhi

..... value of the land which is not the case in the matter of payment of interest under section 34. (iii) section 45 (5) of the act refers to compensation. interest under section 28 of the la act unlike interest under section 34 of the la act is an accretion to the value and hence it is a part of enhanced compensation or consideration ..... income, chargeable to tax under the head "capital gains" of such other person." 39. in order to understand the rationale behind the insertion of sub- section (5) to section 45 of the act with effect from 1st april 1988, the law that was in force prior to its insertion requires to be noted. 40. to begin with, prior to ..... the aforementioned judgement dated 23rd april, 1968 became final and conclusive between the parties. 9. it is in the above background that late mr. j.n. dhamija acquired by way of sale deed dated 1st june, 1965 from mr. rampal malhotra 1/16th share of the bhumidari rights. proceedings under section 31 (2) la act 10. now turning to the land .....

Victory Export and Import Syndicate Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1986Delhi409; ILR1986Delhi320; 1986RLR472

..... after the earth has been dug up by the difficult procedure, as stated above, the stumps had to be stocked ill a proper place dressed and sprayed with insecticides for making them fit for export. after these procedures are over, '.hen the buyers representatives come to inspect each of the stumps, and only those stumps which ..... order, 1978, disallowing export of teak even in sawn sizes must be held to be invalid and unconstitutional. we are assuming the validity of section 3 of the imports and exports (control) act. 1947. the total ban is arbitrary and based on no intelligible criteria. the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents states, as noticed earlier ..... 316(6), (b. p. sinha, c.j., a. k. sarkar. m. hidayatullah, n. rajagopalayyangar and j. r. mudholkar, jj), chief settlement commissioner. punjab v. om parkash and others : [1968]3scr655 , (j. c. shah and v. ramaswami, jj), and rohtas industries ltd., v. s. d. aggarwal and another : [1969]3scr108 , (s. m. sikri, r. s. bachawat and k .....

Vhcpl-adcc Pingalai Infrastrcutres Pvt Ltd and anr. Vs Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

..... two questions viz. (a) whether the forfeiture of security deposit is without authority of law and without any binding contract between the parties and also contrary to section 5 of the contract act and (b) whether the writ petition is maintainable in a claim arising out of a breach of contract. question (b) should have been first answered as ..... nhai is restricted to such highways which are vested in it or entrusted to it by the central government.176. in exercise of the powers conferred under section 11 of the nhai act, 1982, the central government issued a notification no. 2427 dated 22nd september, 2009, entrusting the stretch of the highway no. 6 nagpur-talegaon-amravati by ..... and the suit was filed in the year 1976 during the pendency of the execution proceedings of the eviction order. we fail to understand what appellant was doing from 1968 upto 1976. the net result of all this has been that despite lapse of nearly 30 years since filing of the eviction petition, respondent no. 1 was .....