Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 20 of about 365 results (0.347 seconds)

Feb 22 1994 (HC)

P.K. Thapar and ors. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)852; 1994(28)DRJ593; 1994LabIC1495

..... interpretation of the regulations made by the municipal corporation of delhi under section 98 of the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957, (hereinafter referred to as '1968 regulations'). the said regulations are known as ' delhi electric supply undertaking (d.m.c.) (seniority) regulations, 1968, which fixes the basis of the relative seniority of direct recruits and ..... mechanical), 1980, as published in the schedule (annexure 'p-3')andas framed by the municipal corporation of delhi/ delhi electric supply undertaking, under section 98 of the mcd act, 1957, may be referred to for the purpose of educational and other qualifications, required for direct recruits, us well as to recruitment by promotion/ ..... selection and recruitment of direct recruits. it is also noticeable that inter se seniority of the direct recruits and promotees in each of the cadres of section officers, which had been fixed years back, had not been challenged in the case of h.v.pardasani (supra). the court rightly held that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 2007 (HC)

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT289

..... is a member by force of law. the president of the institute is to be appointed by the central government vide a notification by nominating in terms of section 7 of the act. section 4 does not, in explicit language, refer to the president and the president of the institute is also not specifically named in the members from whom the ..... and in such a case a party would be entitled to move the high court for a writ of mandamus. in padfield v. minister of agriculture, fisheries and food 1968 ac 997 the house of lords held that where parliament had conferred a discretion on the minister of agriculture, fisheries and food, to appoint a committee of investigation so that ..... with premature retirement and the high court also dealt with that aspect of the matter only. this court's judgment in dr. bool chand v. chancellor, kurukshetra university : (1968)iillj135sc relied upon by the high court is not on the point involved in this case. in that case the tenure of dr.bool chand was curtailed as he was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 1990 (HC)

Union of India and Another Vs. Major K.K. Taneja

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1991Delhi215

..... again sent to the competent authority for confirmation. the chief of army staff confirmed the sentence vide order dt. 28-1-77. the respondent's petition under section 164 of the act was considered and rejected by the central government on 27th april, 1977. 6. the respondent herein challenged the court martial proceedings on various grounds in his petition ..... 1253/78) filed on 30-10-78, the respondent had specifically raised the ground that by virtue of s. 153 of the army act, read with para 471 of the army orders of 1968, the findings and sentence awarded by the general court martial against the respondent was required to be confirmed by the competent authority, which in ..... general officer commanding but the goc in-c and in this connection, he refers 'to para471 of the army orders -of 1968. since there is no indication why no subsequent amendment in the army orders, 1968 is there, and also there is no averment as to what is the precise difference between the general officer commanding and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 1975 (HC)

Ajudhia Nath Dhingra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1975Delhi82

..... retiring him on his attaining the age of 58 years a statutory right vesting in him has been infringed. the argument has no force. section 18 (1) of the indian independence act speaks of an act of parliament, order-in-council, order, rules, regulation or other instrument passed or made before the appointed day operating otherwise than as part ..... and reports about fitness for confirmation. this decision, thereforee, is not very relevant for the propositions mooted before us.21. in state of punjab v. dharam singh, : [1968]3scr1 , rule 6 (3) of the relevant rules prohibited extension of period of probation beyond three years. it was held in this situation that if an employee appointed ..... is a rule or a condition to the contrary. indeed, the decisions of the supreme court in parshotam, lal dhingra : (1958)illj544sc and dharam singh : [1968]3scr1 fortify me in coming to the conclusion that in the absence of a rule or condition of service to extend the period of probation, unless there is some .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2004 (HC)

Ramjas Foundation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi238; 110(2004)DLT10; 2004(73)DRJ128

..... sought to be acquired for 'planned development of delhi'. declarations under section 6 of the act, were made on different dates. so far as the lands covered in the present proceedings are concerned, declaration under section 6 of the act were made in 1968 and 1969 (five notifications on different dates).previous proceedings :5. from ..... opportunity of hearing while deciding the objections was not granted, as contemplated under section 5a of the act. addl. solicitor general appearing in the matter, during the course of hearing, placed an order of the collector dated 23.2.1968. a perusal of the aforesaid judgment of the apex court : air1993sc852 clearly ..... render provisions of law nugatory.31. in the instant case, the petitioner miserably failed twice in challenging the acquisition proceedings including declaration under section 6 of the act.32. any delay in non-implementation of the zonal or development plan would amount to permitting unauthorised erection of building or industries which would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 1971 (HC)

Sulekh Ram and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1978(2)ELT525(Del)

..... this case under rule 9 (2). there is an additional reason why rule 9 cannot apply. it applies only to 'excisable goods'. the definition of 'excisable goods' under section 2(d) of the act is 'goods specified in the first schedule' as being subject to duty of excise. the goods manufactured by the petitioner were excisable goods before the issue of notification ..... of duty on bars and rods. he purported to recover the duty under rule 10a. the petitioner appealed to the collector central excise, who dismissed the appeal on 25-11-1968 as per annexure p 12 to the writ petition purporting under rule 9 (2) of the rules. the revision to the central government was dismissed on 29-7-1969 without ..... /61, dated 4th april, 1967 and 22943/61, dated 25th may, 1969, issued against the petitioner and the orders dated 29th july, 1969 by the government of india, 25th november, 1968 by the collector and 9th august, 1967 by the assistant collector are quashed. in the circumstances, i make no order as to costs. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 1998 (HC)

Haryana State Lotteries, Iqbal Chand Khurana, M/S K and Co., M/S. Sunr ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1998(46)DRJ397

..... , learned sr advocate appearing for the petitioner in cwp 530/97. the learned counsel submitted that assuming that delhi sales tax act ( 2nd amendment act) 1994, inserting clause (cc) in sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act, was within the legislative competence of delhi legislature, still levy of sales tax on sale of lottery tickets prior to that ..... as submitted by the learned senior standing counsel for the state then the law as enacted by the parliament i.e. the clause (d) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act includes the lottery tickets within the meaning of 'any other goods' rendering the same liable to tax @ 7% while the amendment by the legislative assembly ..... some of the state govts that it would help them to mobilise finances and to find funds for financing their development plans. in its communication dated july 1, 1968 the ministry of home affairs, govt of india made it clear to the chief secretaries to the govts of all states that authorisation shall be available on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 08 2008 (HC)

Dharambir Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(103)DRJ404

..... b'. they were really concerned that the judge passing the order on charge should be competent to pass such an order in terms of sections 3 and 4 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988 (pca,) since these cases involve offences under that statute. it was, however, submitted that the present application by the cbi ..... cbi is not in the nature of a transfer application but an application invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this court under article 227 of the constitution and section 482 code of criminal procedure, 1973 (crpc) to ensure that the binding judicial directions of this court issued in its judgment dated 11th march 2008 are ..... .k. kochhar should proceed with the pronouncement of orders on charge. he relies upon the judgments of the supreme court in state of gujarat v. vakhastsinghji vajesinghji vaghela (dead) : [1968]3scr692 , state v. navjot sandhu @ afshan guru : (2003)6scc641 , surya dev rai v. ram chander rai : air2003sc3044 , zahira habibullah sheikh v. state of gujarat : .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1994 (HC)

A.K. Bansal Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1994(30)DRJ508

..... . it is implicit in the very nature of things that departmental candidates need not be registered with the employment exchange. this apart section 4(4) of the employment exchanges (compulsory notification of vacancies) act, 1959 permits the selection of candidates not sponsored by the employment exchange. the inherent exception that a departmental employee need not be ..... at page 115 of the paper book. this also appears to be the view of the union public service commission contained in their letter dated december 6, 1968 extracted at pages 99-100 of the paper book in the counter affidavit of respondents i to 3. the real question, thereforee, is whether the construction made ..... few decisions to contend that the requisite qualification should have been there in the candidate before the last date for applying for the post. m.m.c.fernandes, section superintendent, mormugao port trust v. the mormugao port trust and others; 1985 (2) slj 439 is a decision of bombay high court. there, the question was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1977 (HC)

Mohinder Singh Gill and anr. Vs. Chief Election Commissioner and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi265

..... elections to the parliament and legislative assemblies is governed by prescribed time-table for expeditious conclusion of electoral process for purposes of issuing notification under section 73 of the act. in the election, apart from numerous candidates who may participate, all the eligible voters who have exercised their franchise are vitally interested in common ..... , so far as may be, as returning officers in respect of each of the parliamentary constituency by a notification dated 29th january, 1977, issued under section 21 of the act. the deputy commissioner of ferozepore was also nominated as the returning officer. at that time, shri g. b. s. gosal was the deputy commissioner. ..... a particular group by the election commission as representing the congress party and allotting it a symbol under the election symbols (reservation and allotment) order, 1968. the case of the petitioners in the aforesaid case was that paragraph 15 of this order was ultra virp.s the provisions of rules 5 and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //