Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 28 of about 365 results (0.116 seconds)

Mansa Ram Vs. Sudhir Krishna Secy Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... out of the aforesaid area, 5 bighas, 4 biswas of the land was acquired by a notification dated 26.8.1967 under section 4 of the land acquisition act. a declaration under section 6 was made on 22.1.1968 and an award was announced on 19.9.1986.2. according to the petitioner 6 bighas of the land comprised in khasra ..... the debris and stone deposited by them on the said land, the petitioner again filed a comprehensive reminder representation dated 16.2.2012 being aggrieved by the illegal acts of trespass, forceful and intimidatory presence on the land carrying out construction activity in violation of the order dated 29.11.2011 passed in wp(c)no.8388/2011 ..... law are the greatest guarantee to an ordinary citizen and the democratic fabric of society will suffer if respect for the judiciary is undermined. the contempt of courts act, 1971 has been introduced under the statute for the purpose of securing the feeling of confidence of the people in general for true and proper administration of justice .....

Bayer (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1984)(16)ELT375TriDel

..... , and the said consignment was also deposited in the private bonded warehouse at thane under the provisions of section 60 of the customs act, 1962.3. as per the averments made by the appellants, both these chemicals imported were meant for the manufacture of insecticides/pesticides and were dutiable at the time of their import, at the concessional rate of duty at the ..... the provisions of notification no.26-cus., dated 1-3-1968 issued by the government of india, ministry of finance (hereinafter referred to as notification no. 26) subject to the conditions specified therein plus auxiliary duty at the rate of 15%.the said notification no. 26 exempted chemicals for the manufacture of insecticides, pesticides and fungicides and felling under item no. 28 .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Reliance Industries Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1995)(80)ELT831TriDel

..... 491 (bom.), the production of a certificate from the dgtd to the effect that the chemicals imported are required for manufacture of insecticides, and fungicides was a condition in-built in notification dated 1-3-1968. in the present case, however, the recommendation of the textile commissioner though of great pursuasive value is not binding upon the ..... the reference to declaration of ex-factory value of annual production contained in form il for application for licence for effecting substantial expansion under section 13(1)(d) of the idr act, 1951 and press note no. 2, dated 1-1-1986 wherein the procedure for amendment in industrial licence in cases where increased output ..... alloys reported in 1991 (51) e.l.t. 165 (sc). he further submits that the definition of "substantial expansion" in the explanation to section 13(2) of the idr act cannot be looked into to determine the meaning of that expression in the context of project import regulations for the reasons that the explanation relates only .....

Jagat Singh Vs. the Asst. Commissioner and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2005)(2)SLJ1CAT

..... be read to signify something deeper than a mere asking of a person to do a particular act. there must be something in the nature of solicitation to constitute instigation or incitement under section 27 of the industrial dispute act. the words seem to convey the meaning 'to goad or urge forward or to provoke or ..... encourage the doing of an act'. it is, sometimes, difficult to bring out the exact meaning of words ..... moosa raza. the high court has noted the definition of misconduct in stroud's judicial dictionary which runs as under: misconduct means, misconduct arising from ill motive; acts of negligence, errors of judgment, or innocent mistake, do not constitute such misconduct. in industrial jurisprudence amongst others, habitual or gross negligence constitute misconduct but in .....

inarco Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1987)(31)ELT469TriDel

..... in complete transformation must be involved. even processes, such as packing of 'match' in a match-box, has been held to be manufacture, within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act, by high court of madras in case: asstt.collector of central excise v. subramania chettiar, (1980 elt 609).51. we, in the tribunal, have held in ..... and in any case, this, according to him, was permitted by the notification itself (conversion).31. he further made reference to isi specification no. i.s. 4892-1968 pertaining to aprons, saying that these specifications clearly indicate that the products were made up of tubes, and that size of the end-products was not material and that rubber ..... on the supreme court judgments in the case of dcm v. union of india (air 1963 sc 791) and south bihar sugar mills v. union of india air 1968 sc 922, elucidating as to what the expression 'manufacture' implied.14. they also contend that the collector ought to have taken into consideration the fact that excise authorities, .....

i.E.L. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1988)(15)ECC299

..... approval accorded to the classification lists filed was provisional in nature. he ointed out that in the show cause notice the duty had been demanded in terms of section 11a and there was no mention in the show cause notice that the duty had been demanded for the reason of provisional approval of classification lists. he pleaded ..... the expression 'paid' as actually paid in case has again not been adopted by the court of appeal in the case of allen v. thorn electrical industries limited (1968) iq-b 487. having regard to the context in which the said expression appeared in the particular provision which came up for interpretation, the court of appeal construed ..... in the manufacture of steel ingots.under notification no. 150/77, fresh unused melting scrap of various description falling under 26 of the first schedule to the central excise act, were exempted from excise provided that : (a) "such fresh unused steel melting scrap is cleared direct from an integrated steel plant and it is proved to .....

Hindustan Copper Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1983)LC535DTri(Delhi)

..... deptt. of revenue) notification no. gsr 74(e) dated 20th february 1982 by which amendments were given retrospective effect from the 28th february, 1944 vide section 51 of the finance act, 1982. now, the position was made legally clear, namely, excisable goods manufactured in a premises and removed to another part of his same premises for ..... . notification no. 74/65 makes it clear (reference para 3 of the notification) that nothing contained in the said notification shall, with effect from 23rd march, 1968 apply to "plates, sheets, circles, strips and foils of the kind referred to above, manufactured by a manufacturer who also manufactures virgin copper from ore, whether ..... to have taken effect from the 26th day of february, 1965. 3. nothing contained in this notification shall, with effect from the 23rd day of march, 1968, apply to plates, sheets, circles, strips and foils of the kind referred to above, manufactured by a manufacturer who also manufactures virgin copper from ore, whether .....

Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1984)(16)ELT579TriDel

..... this connection shri tayal submitted that the wording of the rule was significantly different from that of certain other provisions in the central excises and salt act or rules. for instance, section 9(b) of the act referred to a person who "evades" the payment of any duty, thus bringing in the concept of intention.similarly, rule 173q(d) referred to contraventions of ..... power to impose a penalty must be exercised judiciously. another reference given by him was to the judgment of the punjab high court in the case of sitaram gurdamal (air 1968 pb 35), wherein it was observed that the word "adjudge" implied a judicial approach and decision. he also referred to a decision of the c.b.e.c.in the ..... judgments of the andhra pradesh high court in the case of gyanoba yashwant jadhav (air 1974 ap 76), of the punjab high court in the case of sitaram gurdamal (air 1968 pb 35), and the order of the c.b.e.c. in the case of agarwal metal works (pvt.) ltd. (1981 e.l.t. 602), all these only underline that .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Shree Vindhya Paper Mills

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1988)(15)ECC239

..... said converted type of paper or paper board shall be deemed to have paid the appropriate duty of excise or the additional duty leviable under section 3 of the customs tariff act, 1975 if it is purchased from the market." "...on the basis of the literature submitted by the party relating to the manufacturing process of ..... mills, nasik, where a further coating is given of additional materials." indian standard glossary of terms used in paper trade and industry second eprint april, 1982 is : 4661-1968 has about chrome paper, coated paper d allied expression 'coating' the following to say - chrome paper. - a paper coated on one side, after manufacture, with material ..... market research, new delhi. in this publication coated (art and chrome) paper figures at serial no. 9 of printing paper. shri sundar rajan relied on is 4658-1968 (reaffirmed 1977) specification for coated paper and board (art and chrome) (second reprint september, 1983) published by isi manak bhavan, new delhi. he also referred to .....

Gulati and Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Ram Chander Through L.Rs and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the suit property by virtue of adverse possession, more so because the land in question had in fact been acquired by chief commissioner of delhi under section 3 of the resettlement of displaced persons (land acquisition) act, 1948 vide notification dated 30.12.1950. (ii) the original plaintiff sh. ram chander had no locus standi to file the suit inasmuch as ..... an error by holding that the lease between the appellant and the respondents survived even after 1951 and stood expired by efflux of time only in the year of 1968, however the said submissions made on behalf of the appellant are devoid of any merits and are contrary on record as perusal of the impugned judgment shows that the ..... subject land and also inducted defendant nos. 2 to 8 therein who are /were in possession of certain portions of the suit property. the lease expired on 31.5.1968 by efflux of time. sh. nihal singh, the original owner expired on 21.12.1978 and whereafter sh. ram chander the original plaintiff, and who is the son .....