Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: insecticides act 1968 section 26 notification of poisoning Court: delhi Page 14 of about 365 results (0.130 seconds)

Sep 15 1993 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Markfed Agro Chemicals

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1993)(68)ELT848TriDel

..... agents to pesticidal chemicals in highly concentrated form would amount to manufacture within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act since it results in the emergence of a new and distinct product having different properties viz.pesticide/insecticide fit for either direct use or after addition of water. according to the learned jdr ..... stabilisers for diluting them and rendering them suitable for use either directly or after addition of water, amounted to manufacture within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act. according to the respondents the process of dilution of basic pesticidal chemicals through addition of solvents, surface active agents and solvents, surface active ..... products in question since the basic chemicals used were duty-paid and the processing carried out did not constitute 'manufacture' within the meaning of section 2(f) of the act, since there was no transformation resulting in the emergence of any new or different article having distinctive name, character and use. on these .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 1998 (TRI)

Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1999)(106)ELT41TriDel

..... 11-4-1991.both the classification lists were approved by the assistant collector, bhandup and thane. the collector reviewed the approval under section 35e(2) of the central excise act and, on appeals being filed, the collector (appeals) bombay set aside the approval and classified the impugned products under sub-heading ..... the word 'disinfectant' means a substance used on inanimate objects which destroys harmful micro-organisms or inhibits their activities; that disinfectant cannot be equated with insecticides; that disinfectants are preparations for general disinfection purposes and are used in bathrooms, gutters, floor cleaning etc. he also referred to page 529 of ..... also submitted that hsn note iv under heading 38.08 excludes "preparations covered by more specific headings of the nomenclatures or having subsidiary disinfecting, insecticidal, etc. properties." in reply, the learned advocate submitted that it is clear from the description mentioned on the container that the product is meant .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 2013 (HC)

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

Court : Delhi

..... and affiliate companies operates in several countries around the world. ii. the business comprises of various consumer and healthcare products including antiseptic liquid, toilet care products, surface care products, pharmaceuticals, insecticides, and food products which bear world famous trademarks including harpic, dettol, mortein, cherry blossom. iii. incorporated on july 5, 1951 reckitt coleman and benckiser, pursuant to the world wide merger ..... is its amber gold colour and the fact that it becomes milky when diluted in water. also, the packaging of dettol is distinct, having a sword on the pack that acts as a mnemonic for fighting against germs and infection. vi. dettol has a vast usage, it can be added to bathing water in order to kill germs, used for shaving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 16 1998 (TRI)

Crop Health Products Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1998)(102)ELT376TriDel

..... the use of the appellants' premises by m/s. bayer india limited for manufacturing and taking certain agro chemical formulations. these formulations, namely, insecticides, weedicides and fungicides, fall under heading no. 3808.10 of the central excise tariff act. m/s. bayer india limited filed an application for exemption from licensing under notification no. 27/92 on the ground that the goods .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1983 (TRI)

Anand Synthochem Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1989)(43)ELT477TriDel

1. the captioned appeals were initially filed as revision applications before the central government and have come as transferred proceedings, in terms of section 131-b(2) of the customs act, 1962, to this tribunal for disposal as if they were appeals filed before it.2. the issue involved being the same in both the appeals, they are disposed of by ..... dictionary" (10th edition) at page 1101 describes the uses of xylenol which-nomenclature takes in the isomer 3, 5-xylenol. among other uses, is the use as "disinfectants, solvents, pharmaceuticals, insecticides and fungicides". it cannot, therefore, be disputed that 3, 5-xylenol finds use as pharmaceutical."pharmaceutical" according to the chamber's 20th century dictionary means a chemical used in medicine .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 02 2011 (HC)

Harvinder Singh Vs. the State (Govt. of N.C.T)

Court : Delhi

..... as per cfsl report ex. pw16/a, the description of the said parcel is as under:- "grey coloured powdery substance kept in a metallic tube labelled as "fumigant-insecticide aluminium phosphide 56% quick phos." there is a clear discrepancy in the dibbi ex. p6 which is alleged to have seized vide memo ex. pw6/i and the parcel ..... well-justified course to be adopted by the criminal court that the concealment was made by him. such an interpretation is not inconsistent with the principle embodied in section 27 of the evidence act." 23. in state of maharashtra v. suresh: jt 1999(9)sc 513, the supreme court has held as under:- "24. one of the formidably incriminating ..... well justified course to be adopted by the criminal court that the concealment was made by himself. such an interpretation is not inconsistent with the principle embodied in section 27 of the evidence act." 24. a division bench of this court in prithipal singh v. state (crl.a.no.75/2004), decided on 12th march, 2010, has held as under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2013 (HC)

Manoj Kumar Singh and ors. Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

..... maintenance of stocks or in the examination, inspection and analysis of food grains in govt. or public/private sector undertaking, desirable: (knowledge of toxicology of insecticides, rodicides and fumigants in use in grains/stocks. the experience acquired as junior/senior research fellow while pursuing higher studies, will be reckoned as required experience ..... regulations, instructions, orders issued by the central government in the food corporation of india as per the directions of the central government under section 6(2) of the food corporations act, 1964, all the concerned in the corporation are hereby informed that in all cases where there are no specific provisions in the food ..... corporation act, 1964, or rules or regulations or instructions made thereunder, the food corporation shall follow the central government rules regulations, instructions, orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2019 (HC)

Rakesh Etc. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

..... to come back on account of harassment, was scuttled by her father. on 19.12.1987, while at her matrimonial home, the deceased had committed suicide by consuming insecticide. in this factual background, it was held by the supreme court that:-" 4 whatever demands of dowry arose after the marriage, over which there were differences between the parties ..... deceased had joined back at her matrimonial home, there is no evidence on record that any demand of dowry was made. the trial court has relied on section 32 indian evidence act to treat the complaint dated 21.06.2002 filed by the deceased before the caw cell and the statement made by her crl.a.298/2004 page ..... test. the term soon before is not synonymous with the term immediately before and is opposite of the expression soon after as used and understood in section 114. illustration (a) of the evidence act. these words would imply that the interval should not be too long between the time of making the statement and the death. it contemplates the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 01 1985 (TRI)

Wander Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1989)(43)ELT503TriDel

1. the captioned appeal was originally filed as a revision application before the central government which, under the provisions of section 131-b of the customs act, 1962, has come as transferred proceedings to this tribunal for disposal as if it were an appeal filed before it.2. the dispute in the present case is whether a ..... /75. the lower authorities rejected the claim on the ground that the substance was a general purpose chemical used for introduction of the benzoyl group in chemical synthesis of dyes, insecticides etc. and, hence, it could not be considered as a drug intermediate.3. shri r.g. sheth, advocate, for the appellants, submitted before us that the chemical was used by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 2002 (TRI)

Safex Chemical India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(87)ECC192

..... amount of penalty and take up the appeal itself for disposal with the consent of both the sides.2. learned advocate submitted that the appellants manufacture pesticides and insecticides; that the central excise officers on visit of their unit on 20.6.2000 found shortage of the finished goods in comparison to the balance recorded in the ..... submitted that the duty liability is not being challenged by them; that in the show cause notice it was proposed to impose penalty both under section 11 ac of the central excise act and rule 173q of the central excise rules; that in the personal hearing before the adjudicating authority they offered to pay 25% of the duty ..... the department that the goods were manufactured and cleared even without entering into the statutory records. further, the appellants have claimed the benefit of proviso to section 11 ac which provides that if the duty is paid alongwith interest within 30 days from the date of communication of order, the amount of penalty leviable under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //