Inquiry - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Kiran Bedi Vs. Committee of Inquiry and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC714; 1989CriLJ903; JT1989(1)SC21; 1988(2)SCALE42; (1989)1SCC494; [1989]1SCR20; 1989(1)LC340(SC)

those persons would be examined at the end of the inquiry. The Committee emphasised on the circumstance that in the inquiry

Justice P.D. Dinakaran Vs. Judges Inquiry Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Committee shall proceed with the inquiry. 9. Report of the Inquiry Committee.-(1) Where the members of the Inquiry Committee are not

District Administration Vs. Commissioner of Inquiry and ors.

Court: Guwahati

evidence in this defence at the very inception of the inquiry is a contradiction in terms inasmuch as in this situation

Amrish N. Patel, Member, Jan Sangarsh Manch Vs. Commission of Inquiry ...

Court: Gujarat

Commission to give reasonable opportunity of being heard in the inquiry and to produce evidence to any person which the Commission

Krishna Ballabh Sahay and ors. Vs. Commission of Inquiry and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1969SC258; 1969(17)BLJR392; 1969CriLJ520; [1969]1SCR387

to the notice of the Commission in course of the inquiry.'The inquiry was entrusted to Mr. T. L. Venkatarama Aiyar, a

Kiran Bedi and ors. Vs. Committee of Inquiry and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC2252; 1989CriLJ303; JT1988(3)SC372; 1988(2)SCALE272; (1988)4SCC49; [1988]Supp2SCR518; 1988(2)LC731(SC)

witness box for being cross-examined till the end of the inquiry. The Committee would have then asked them to give evidence

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Kumher Inquiry Commission and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3917

against the common order dated 28-10-1993 passed by the Kumher Inquiry Commission, Jodhpur (Camp-Bharatpur), directing the petitioners to produce :-(1) the

T Ramesh Babu Vs. The Inquiry Authority

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

OF CERTIORARI OR APPROPRIATE ORDER QUASHING THE ORDER DATED2803-2022 IN INQUIRY PROCESS AS PER HO ORDER No.REF HO2021008,486,2021 DATED0301.2022 IS PRODUCED

Prabhat Kumar Vs. the Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 70(1997)DLT671

petitioners' reputation was likely to be prejudicially affected by the inquiry, in respect of the terms of the reference mentioned at

The Central Intelligence Officer Vs. the Commissioner of Inquiry (Mara ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2005CriLJ2944; 2005(2)KLT927

of opinion that, having regard to the nature of the inquiry to be made and other circumstances of the case, all