Inquiries - Judgment Search Results

Justice P.D. Dinakaran Vs. Judges Inquiry Committee and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

1. This petition is directed against order dated 24.4.2011 passed by the Committee constituted by the Chairman of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) (for short, `the Chairman') under Section 3(2) of the Judges (Inquiry) Act,...

Smt. Kiran Bedi Vs. Committee of Inquiry and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1989SC714; 1989CriLJ903; JT1989(1)SC21; 1988(2)SCALE42; (1989)1SCC494; [1989]1SCR20; 1989(1)LC340(SC); MANU/SC/0512/1989

ORDERWhereas the Administrator of the Union Territory of Delhi is of the opinion that a judicial inquiry is necessary into matters of public importance mentioned below; Now therefore, the Administrator is pleased to constitute a Committee,...

Kiran Bedi and ors. Vs. Committee of Inquiry and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC2252; 1989CriLJ303; JT1988(3)SC372; 1988(2)SCALE272; (1988)4SCC49; [1988]Supp2SCR518; 1988(2)LC731(SC)

E.S. Venkataramiah, J. 1. It is unfortunate that this case has arisen between lawyers and police who are both guardians of law and who constitute two important segments of society on whom the stability of the...

Krishna Ballabh Sahay and ors. Vs. Commission of Inquiry and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1969SC258; 1969(17)BLJR392; 1969CriLJ520; [1969]1SCR387

Hidayatullah, C.J.1. The Appeal shall stand dismissed, but there shall be no order as to costs. Reasons for our judgment will follow. Stay order is vacated.HIDAYATULLAH, C. J.:2. This appeal is brought against an order of...

T Ramesh Babu Vs. The Inquiry Authority

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

- 1 - NC:2023. KHC-D:9200 WP No.101897 of 2022 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF AUGUST, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.101897 OF2022(S-RES) BETWEEN:...

M/s.Green Global Logistics Vs The Inquiry office

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and WMP Nos.6809 and 6812 of 2026 M/s.Green Global Logistics, Represented by its Partner Mr.M.Saleem, No.98 /100, East Madha Church Street, Royapuram, Chennai-...

M/s Airtrax Freight Logistics Vs The Inquiry officer / Asst. Commissio ...

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 15-04-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and W.M.P. Nos.15760 and 15762 of 2026 M/s.Airtrax Freight Logistics Plot No.16 First Floor, Muthukumar Nagar Extension Poonamallee, Chennai 600 056 Rep. by...

District Administration Vs. Commissioner of Inquiry and ors.

Court: Guwahati

B.P. Katakey, J. 1. The Government of Meghalaya in exercise of the power conferred by Section 3 of the Commission of Inquiry Act, 1952 (Act No. 60 of 1952) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), upon...

Amrish N. Patel, Member, Jan Sangarsh Manch Vs. Commission of Inquiry ...

Court: Gujarat

terms of reference were expanded. This was principally done on the basis that the Government received representations for inquiring into the role and conduct of the Chief Minister, Ministers, Officers of the Government, other individuals and organizations.

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Kumher Inquiry Commission and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3917

State Government appointing the Commission has confined the jurisdiction of the Commission only to the point of making inquiries about the law and order situation prevailing at Kumher in the month of June, 1992.15. While claiming privilege,