Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Ink - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 22 1980

JaIn Ink Manufacturing Company Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-22-1980

Reported in: AIR1981SC670; 1982(2)SCALE1382; (1980)4SCC435; [1981]1SCR498

Matched in: Parties JaIn Ink Manufacturing Company Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and anr.


Jan 10 2013

Shalimar Inks and Chemicals Vs. Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-10-2013

THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 1041 of 2013 (E) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER: ------------------- SHALIMAR INKS AND CHEMICALS, SHALIMAR HOUSE, 549/G-D, EDAYAR, BINANIPURAM.P.O, ALUVA-683 502, (REPRESENTED BY K.M. BHANUVIKRAMAN, MANAGING PARTNER. BY ADV. SRI.VIJAYAN.


Feb 27 2025

EXIM INK CO Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-2025

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2025CoramThe Honourable Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy and W.M.P.Nos.7377 & 7378 of 2025 Exim Ink Co. rep. By its Partner, R.Valliammai ...Petitioner Vs The Commercial Tax Officer, Thiruvanmiyur Assessment Circle, No.242, Integrated Commercial


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 16 2006

Rainbow Ink and Varnish Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Rollatainer ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-16-2006

Reported in: [2008]145CompCas189(P& H); (2006)143PLR634

Matched in: Parties Rainbow Ink and Varnish Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Rollatainer Limited


Oct 20 2000

United Ink and Varnish Co. Ltd. Vs. State of ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-20-2000

Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)783; 89(2001)DLT367; 2001(57)DRJ402

of by this judgment. The detailed facts of only one petition Crl.M.(M).No.1432/2000 are recapitulated.2. Respondent No.2 (M/s Howard Ink Co.(P) Ltd.) and respondent No.3 (Shri S.R.Narula, the Managing Director of M/s Howard Ink Co. Pvt.Ltd.) issued cheque


Feb 18 2002

Ganges Printing Ink and ors. Vs. Mr. Sardari Lal Duggal and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Feb-18-2002

Reported in: 98(2002)DLT22

Matched in: Parties Ganges Printing Ink and ors. Vs. Mr. Sardari Lal Duggal and anr.


Feb 26 2003

Rakesh Ink Industries Vs. State and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Feb-26-2003

Reported in: AIR2003Raj283; RLW2003(2)Raj1340; 2003(3)WLC87; 2003(2)WLN480

Matched in: Parties Rakesh Ink Industries Vs. State and ors.


Apr 13 1998

Vibgyar Ink Chem (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Safe Pack Polymers Ltd.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-13-1998

Reported in: 1998(3)ALD638; 1998(3)ALT557; [1998]93CompCas407(AP)

Matched in: Parties Vibgyar Ink Chem (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Safe Pack Polymers Ltd.


Apr 04 2000

Kumar Printing Ink (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT125TriDel

Matched in: Parties Kumar Printing Ink (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.


Feb 27 2001

Jba Printing Inks Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-27-2001

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT387Tri(Mum.)bai

1. The appellant was engaged inter alia in the manufacture of printing ink. Some consignments of the ink that is so manufactured were not accepted by the customers, being defective, and


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial