Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Injury - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 2013

Indian Spinal Injuries Hospital Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2013

is stated to have more than 20 schools besides Jawaharlal Nehru University and various institutions including Indian Spinal Injury Centre, Fortis Hospital and Apollo Hospital Centre. The area also has a number of shopping malls. The case


Nov 27 2012

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Neither Any Injury nor Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-27-2012

hearing, the following order was passed by this Court on 1.11.2012:- “Learned counsel, inter-alia, contended that neither any injury not any specific role or overt-act is attributed to the petitioner and he has been CRM not M-34101


Jul 01 2013

“12. in the Case at Hand out of the Seven Injuries Only Injury Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-01-2013

sons of Sunda Ram had suffered 7 injuries each with blunt weapons whereas Krishan Kumar had suffered 1 injury with blunt weapon. The said information was converted into FIR at 3.30 a.m. on 10.10.1998 and sent to


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Injuries Vs. State of Punjab --respo ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-08-2014

Lopoke, District Amritsar (Rural).On 11.4.2014, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel would contend that the injuries attributed to the present petitioners are as regards having given Kirpan blows to injured/complainant Rajwinder Singh, as a


May 27 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Injuries Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-27-2014

while issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court :- “Counsel would contend that the injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple in nature. Counsel would further contend that as per the complainant version,


Aug 11 2014

“counsel Would Inter Alia Contend That Injuries No.1 and 2 Allegedly ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-11-2014

Monu on account of which offence under Section 325 I.P.C has been cited. It is contended that no injury has been attributed to the present petitioner, who is otherwise ready and willing to join investigation. Notice of


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial