Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Injurious - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 16 2013

Indian Spinal Injuries Hospital Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-16-2013

ENVIRONMENT TRADITIONS AND PROMOTIONS OF NATIONAL AWARENESS ......Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 12719/2009 INDIAN SPINAL INJURIES HOSPITAL .....Petitioner Versus UOI & ORS. + ......Respondents W.P.(C) 13675/2009 BIJWASAN GRAM VIKAS SAMITI & ORS. .....Petitioners Versus


Nov 27 2012

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That Neither Any Injury nor Vs ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Nov-27-2012

CRM not M-34101 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-34101 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 27.11.2012 Mantinder Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent...


Jul 01 2013

“12. in the Case at Hand out of the Seven Injuries Only Injury Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-01-2013

at Rewari, he (my father Siri Ram) breathed his last on the way as a result of the injuries sustained by him in the occurrence. Above named Attar Singh and others have, in prosecution of their common


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 08 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Injuries Vs. State of Punjab --respo ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-08-2014

Lopoke, District Amritsar (Rural).On 11.4.2014, the following order was passed by this Court:- “Counsel would contend that the injuries attributed to the present petitioners are as regards having given Kirpan blows to injured/complainant Rajwinder Singh, as a


May 27 2014

“counsel Would Contend That the Injuries Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-27-2014

while issuing notice of motion, following order was passed by this Court :- “Counsel would contend that the injuries attributed to the petitioners are simple in nature. Counsel would further contend that as per the complainant version,


Aug 11 2014

“counsel Would Inter Alia Contend That Injuries No.1 and 2 Allegedly ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-11-2014

and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM No.M-21317 of 2014 2 30.6.2014:- “Counsel would inter alia contend that injuries no.1 and 2 allegedly suffered by the complainant Paramjit Kaur have been attributed to Gurdeep Singh @ Monu


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial