Initialize - Judgment Search Results
Suo Motu Cognizance Vs. Suo Motu Cognizance
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: December 19, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8066/2013...
Initiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-13-2019
h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9841/2019 and CM APPL. 40695/2019 INITIATING OFFICER, ACIT BENAMI PROHIBITION..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr.
Prabha Misra Initially Dixit (Smt.) Vs. District Judge
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-01-2004
Reported in: (2005)1UPLBEC645
and not to interfere with her functioning.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as a Stenographer in the Civil Courts, Kanpur Dehat
“initially the Investigation the Case Was Carried out by S.i. Hukam ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-04-2013
only be quashed in rarest of rare case at the initial stage as per the following conditions:- (i) Where the allegations
initiative for Transportation and Development Pro Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2013
versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Lawyers Initiative Through Its Member Veena Kumari Vs. State of Punjab ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-04-2014
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15133-1996 Date of decision:-04.02.2014 Lawyers Initiative through its member Veena Kumari, Advocate and member Lawyers’ Initiative
“24. Initiating the Argument Shri N.K. Tanwar Vs. M/S Goodyear India ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-27-2014
of user from the appellant. It was also admitted that initially a demand of `11,700 per acre was raised on account
initiative for Transportation and Development Prog Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2014
AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND
Swift Initiative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dilip Chhabria Design Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-19-2015
the purposes of the Franchised Business. ARTICLE 2 TERM 2.1 Initial Term The agreement shall commence from the Commencement Date and
initiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Oct-03-2007
Reported in: (2008)9STR509
sales and marketing agents for IES in respect of our Initiating Explosives products. For this purpose, ICI had outsourced and procured
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »