Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Initialize - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search
Dec 19 2013

Suo Motu Cognizance Vs. Suo Motu Cognizance

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-2013

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: December 19, 2013 + W.P.(C) 8066/2013...


Sep 13 2019

Initiating Officer, Acit Benami Prohibition vs.appellate Tribunal Unde ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-13-2019

h September, 2019 + W.P.(C) 9841/2019 and CM APPL. 40695/2019 INITIATING OFFICER, ACIT BENAMI PROHIBITION..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Sr.


Oct 01 2004

Prabha Misra Initially Dixit (Smt.) Vs. District Judge

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-01-2004

Reported in: (2005)1UPLBEC645

and not to interfere with her functioning.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as a Stenographer in the Civil Courts, Kanpur Dehat


Mar 04 2013

“initially the Investigation the Case Was Carried out by S.i. Hukam ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-04-2013

only be quashed in rarest of rare case at the initial stage as per the following conditions:- (i) Where the allegations


Dec 20 2013

initiative for Transportation and Development Pro Vs. Mcd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2013

versus GOVT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents W.P. (C) 8580/2009 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND


Feb 04 2014

Lawyers Initiative Through Its Member Veena Kumari Vs. State of Punjab ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-04-2014

PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15133-1996 Date of decision:-04.02.2014 Lawyers Initiative through its member Veena Kumari, Advocate and member Lawyers’ Initiative


May 27 2014

“24. Initiating the Argument Shri N.K. Tanwar Vs. M/S Goodyear India ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-27-2014

of user from the appellant. It was also admitted that initially a demand of `11,700 per acre was raised on account


Sep 30 2014

initiative for Transportation and Development Prog Vs. Mcd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-30-2014

AND ORS. ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 8580/2009, C.M. APPL.5656/2009 & 8503/2012 INITIATIVE FOR TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES ..... Petitioner versus MCD AND


Oct 19 2015

Swift Initiative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Dilip Chhabria Design Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-19-2015

the purposes of the Franchised Business. ARTICLE 2 TERM 2.1 Initial Term The agreement shall commence from the Commencement Date and


Oct 03 2007

initiating Explosives Systems Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Oct-03-2007

Reported in: (2008)9STR509

sales and marketing agents for IES in respect of our Initiating Explosives products. For this purpose, ICI had outsourced and procured


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files

Start your Free Trial