Information Technology Act 2000 Section 2 - Judgment Search Results

The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Another Vs. M/s. Reliance ...

Court: Mumbai

- The terms signed and signature also include attribution of electronic record as per section 11 of the Information Technology Act, 2000] Section 2(l) : instrument includes every document by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created,

Vishal Paper Tech India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)210; 2005CriLJ1838

Obviously keeping in view the said fact recent enactment like Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and Information Technology Act, 2000 prescribe fine in lakhs of rupees for the offences committed under those enactments. But the fine prescribed in … but had also, fraudulently, invoked the bank guarantees without returning them, and hence are liable for punishment under Section 120-B, 406, 417, 418 and 420 read with 34, IPC. The said complaint was referred to police for … and others alleging that the accused who entered into an agreement on 20-1-1995 to purchase a Multi-layer coated boards manufacturing, machine for Rs. 380.00 lakhs

Nirmaljit Singh Narula Vs. Indijobs at Hubpages.Com and Others

Court: Delhi

of defendant No.2, it is an „intermediary‟within the definition of Section 2(1) (w) and Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. Under Section 79 (3)(b) of the IT Act,2000, defendant No.2 is under an obligation to remove unlawful content

K. Ramajayam @ Appu Vs. The Inspector of Police, T-4, Maduravoyal Poli ...

Court: Chennai

- Section 3, Section 25, Section 114, Section 45, Section 45A, section 76, Section 62, Section 65B - Information Technology Act, 2000- Section 2, Section 2(t), Section 2, Section 79A - Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 - burglary and murder €“ order

Orissa Consumers' Association and Anr. Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulato ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR2005Ori11

Gazette (Extraordinary) on 10-6-2004 they came into force. He brought to our notice that Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 provides inter alia that where notification is published in the Official Gazette, then such requirement shall be deemed … object of protecting the right, interest and welfare of consumers in the State of Orissa. The petitioner No. 2 is, a consumer of electricity. The Grid Corporation of Orissa Limited (for short, 'GRIDCO') has been procuring, transmitting

Manoj Oswal Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through Sr.P.i and Another

Court: Mumbai

Branch, Pune alleging offences punishable under Section 500 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 4 The complaint alleges that one Prataprao Govindrao Pawar is Chairman of M/s Sakal Papers Private Limited. This … Dharmadhikari, J. 1 RULE. 2 The Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, heard forthwith. 3 By this Writ Petition under Article 226

Tirumala Devi Eada and Others Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh, Law (La ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

publication shall be deemed to be the date of the Gazette which was first published in any form.” Section 2 (s) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 defines “electronic gazette” as “official gazette” published in the electronic form. … in the A.P. State Gazette is immaterial. At the outset, we may refer to Section 8 of the Information Technology Act, 2000: “8. Publication of rule, regulation, etc., in Electronic Gazette:- Where any law provides that any rule, regulation, order,

Veena Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

offences punishable under Sections 341 and 384 etc., of the IPC, as well as Section 66(1) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. 3. Further, it was the allegation of the respondents that a rowdy sheet was opened against the detenue … 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate. 2. The petitioner is said to be the wife of one Sri Rajnikant Bijawad son of Sri Kashappa Bijawad

Avnish Bajaj Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 150(2008)DLT769; 2008(105)DRJ721

an obscene product within the meaning of Section 292 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ('CrPC') also raises questions … of making available for sale and causing to be published an obscene product within the meaning of Section 292 Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act 2000 (IT Act). This petition under

M/S. Abraham Memorial Educational Trust and Others Vs. C. Suresh Babu

Court: Chennai

the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, Section 85 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Section 149 of the Electricity Act, 2003, Section 47 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, … the Negotiable Instruments Act. Therefore, one has to again look for the definition in the General Clauses Act. Section 2(42) of the General Clauses Act defines the term 'person' as follows: "person" shall include any company or association